8 Best Remote Support Software Worth Considering in 2026

When I look at remote support tools, I’m thinking about the people who have to solve problems without being in the same room as the user: IT teams, help desk technicians, MSPs, and support leads. Whether they’re troubleshooting devices, restoring access, or supporting users across locations, the right remote support software can make that work faster, more secure, and less frustrating.

In this article, I’ve evaluated 8 of the best remote support software tools using G2 Data, verified user reviews, and hands-on product research. I’ll show you what each tool is best for, what G2 software reviewers say about using it, and the pricing details you’ll want to know before deciding which option fits your support workflow best.

8 best remote support software for 2026: An overview of my top picks

The best remote support software for 2026 helps IT teams troubleshoot devices, resolve technical issues, and support users from anywhere. Based on G2’s Grid Report, top picks include NinjaOne, TeamViewer, Zoho Assist, JumpCloud, Datto RMM, Atera, Action1, and AirDroid Business.

Rating and pricing details are as of August 2026.

1. NinjaOne: Best for ease of doing business with

NinjaOne is an endpoint management platform for IT teams and managed service providers (MSPs), with remote support built into a broader set of monitoring, patching, deployment, and management capabilities. I see it as especially relevant when remote troubleshooting needs to happen alongside other endpoint tasks; its 100% G2 user satisfaction score further reinforces how well it performs in real-world use.

Key features of NinjaOne:

• One-click and unattended remote access across distributed endpoints
• Multi-monitor control, file transfer, and command-line access
• Remote scripting and automation for routine support tasks
• Remote reboot and patching from the same management console
• Session recording and role-based access controls

Pros of NinjaOne as per G2 reviewers:

• Automation reduces repetitive support work. Reviewers praise its PowerShell and CMD tools, script library, and device-group actions for streamlining patching, monitoring, and deployment without relying on manual remote sessions.
• Customer support earns consistent praise. G2 reviewers highlight fast responses, proactive account managers, and one-to-one guidance. NinjaOne’s 93% quality of support score reinforces that strength.
• Remote access stays tied to endpoint management. Users value reaching devices from the same console used for patching and deployment, backed by 93% scores for unattended remote access and remote reboot.

Cons of NinjaOne as per G2 reviewers:

• Reporting can feel restrictive for tailored needs. Based on G2 reviews, standard dashboards cover daily monitoring, but specialized views may require filtering or exports. Teams using business intelligence tools can still extend reporting when needed.
• Built-in ticketing lags behind dedicated PSA tools. G2 reviewers note that native ticket handling works for straightforward requests, but customization feels limited as workflows grow complex. Many reviewers still call it a solid starting point that pairs well with a dedicated PSA tool.

Explore firsthand feedback from NinjaOne users. →

2. TeamViewer: Best for screen sharing

TeamViewer offers a broader portfolio spanning remote connectivity, digital employee experience, frontline operations, and enterprise remote access. I’m focused on its remote-support capabilities, including remote control, unattended access, file transfer, and multi-platform connections; its 92% multi-platform support score reinforces that cross-device reach.

Key features of TeamViewer:

• Real-time screen sharing and remote control across devices
• Unattended remote access for always-on endpoint support
• Cross-platform connectivity across major desktop and mobile systems
• File transfer, multi-monitor support, and Wake-on-LAN
• Session recording and secure access controls for remote support

Pros of TeamViewer as per G2 reviewers:

• Support sessions are quick to start. TeamViewer scores 93% for ease of use, and reviewers describe the interface as intuitive with little setup friction, helping technicians assist users faster.
• Cross-platform support adds flexibility. Its 92% multi-platform support score reflects easy connections across devices and operating systems without a VPN, with minimal effort required from end users.
• In-session tools keep troubleshooting efficient. TeamViewer scores 94% for screen sharing and 92% for file sharing, while reviewers value file transfer, multi-monitor support, and screen sharing in one session.

Cons of TeamViewer as per G2 reviewers:

• Licensing can feel expensive for lighter-use teams. According to G2 reviews, smaller organizations frequently flag pricing and occasional commercial-use prompts, though many still find the reliability worthwhile for regular remote support.
• Performance depends on network quality. G2 reviewers mention lag or brief drops on weaker connections, but describe TeamViewer as fast and dependable when bandwidth is stable.

Explore firsthand feedback from TeamViewer users. →

3. Zoho Assist: Best for small business remote support

Zoho Assist is Zoho’s dedicated remote support and unattended-access product for IT help desks, MSPs, customer support teams, and enterprises. With on-demand support, unattended access, file transfer, diagnostics, and cross-platform coverage, I see it as a well-rounded option for smaller teams; 70% of its G2 reviewers are from small businesses.

Key features of Zoho Assist:

• On-demand and unattended remote support across distributed devices
• File transfer and multi-monitor navigation during active sessions
• Remote reboot, reconnect, and Wake-on-LAN for troubleshooting
• Session recording with text, voice, and video communication
• AES-256 encryption and multi-factor authentication for secure access

Pros of Zoho Assist as per G2 reviewers:

• The interface keeps support simple. Zoho Assist scores 94% for ease of use, and reviewers describe it as intuitive for both technicians and customers, with little learning friction.
• Sessions are easy to launch. Its 94% ease of setup score matches reviewer praise for shareable access links and straightforward unattended-access deployment that gets users connected quickly.
• Value for money stands out. Small teams and MSPs often say Zoho Assist delivers strong remote-support capabilities at a lower cost than pricier alternatives, making it appealing for budget-conscious teams.

Cons of Zoho Assist as per G2 reviewers:

• First-time connections can need some guidance. G2 reviewers note that non-technical users may have to download a lightweight app or clear antivirus restrictions, but reviewers generally find the process quick once that step is handled.
• Mobile support is less polished than desktop. Based on G2 reviews, users mention occasional keyboard quirks or lag on iOS and Android, making mobile support tricky. Desktop controls remain smoother and more dependable.

Explore firsthand feedback from Zoho Assist users. →

4. JumpCloud: Best for identity and access management

JumpCloud is a broader identity, access, and device management platform with Remote Assist built into the same environment. It combines endpoint administration with capabilities such as single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), and policy management, while its 93% ease of admin score on G2 supports its centralized approach.

Key features of JumpCloud:

• Live and unattended remote access for distributed devices
• Cross-platform support across Windows, macOS, and Linux
• Remote command execution and background troubleshooting tools
• Remote file transfer and multi-monitor session support
• Session logging and role-based access controls for secure administration

Pros of JumpCloud as per G2 reviewers:

• Centralized administration simplifies IT management. Reviewers like managing identity, devices, single sign-on (SSO), policies, and access from one console. Its 93% ease of admin score reinforces that fit for lean IT teams.
• Multi-platform support is a clear strength. JumpCloud scores 91% for multi-platform support, and reviewers praise its coverage across Windows, macOS, and Linux without relying on separate OS-specific tools.
• Identity controls strengthen remote administration. Reviewers value SSO, multi-factor authentication (MFA), and conditional access for reducing password-related support work while tightening access. Its 90% compliance score adds further reassurance.

Cons of JumpCloud as per G2 reviewers:

• Advanced configuration takes time to learn. According to G2 reviews, routine administration is straightforward, but deeper policies and integrations may require documentation and setup. Reviewers generally say the platform becomes much easier once that learning curve passes.
• The built-in password manager trails dedicated tools. G2 reviewers mention occasional autofill issues and a less polished browser experience, but many still value it as a convenient addition within JumpCloud’s broader identity platform.

Explore firsthand feedback from JumpCloud users. →

5. Datto RMM: Best for remote reboot 

Datto RMM is a cloud-based remote monitoring and management platform built primarily for managed service providers (MSPs) and IT teams overseeing distributed endpoints. Alongside remote control, it brings together monitoring, automation, patching, scripting, and integrations such as Autotask PSA; its 90% ease of use score suggests that breadth remains manageable day to day.

Key features of Datto RMM:

• One-click HTML5 remote control for servers, laptops, and desktops
• Real-time endpoint monitoring with intelligent alerts and automated responses
• Custom scripting and automation for routine remote management tasks
• Automated patch management for securing distributed endpoints
• Native Autotask PSA integration for connected ticketing and support workflows

Pros of Datto RMM as per G2 reviewers:

• Monitoring and automation reduce repetitive endpoint work. Reviewers praise centralized dashboards, scripting, alerts, and automated responses, while Datto RMM’s 92% remote reboot score reinforces its strength in remote management.
• Kaseya integrations keep technician context together. G2 reviewers value Autotask and IT Glue for accessing tickets, documentation, and credentials with less switching, while native Autotask PSA integration connects RMM data with service operations.
• Patch management offers strong visibility and control. Reviewers value Windows and third-party patching, compliance status, automated policies, approvals, and device-level reporting for more structured endpoint maintenance.

Cons of Datto RMM as per G2 reviewers:

• Navigation can get dense in complex environments. Reviewers mention extra clicks in policy management and menus, especially for newer technicians. Once configured, though, they value the granular control and more efficient day-to-day administration.
• Web remote sessions can be slow to connect. Some reviewers report latency with Web Remote and Agent Browser under heavier workloads, but generally find troubleshooting dependable once connected.

Explore firsthand feedback from Datto RMM users. →

6. Atera: Best for remote monitoring and management

Atera is an IT management platform that combines remote monitoring and management (RMM), remote access, ticketing, patching, automation, and AI tools. It serves both MSPs and internal IT teams, and I see its 94% Ease of Use score on G2 as a useful signal that the broader platform remains approachable despite its range of capabilities.

Key features of Atera:

• Attended and unattended remote access via Splashtop and AnyDesk
• File transfer and multi-monitor support during remote sessions
• Remote session recording and simultaneous technician access
• Remote monitoring, scripting, and automation from the same console
• Encrypted sessions with two-factor authentication and audit logs

Pros of Atera as per G2 reviewers:

• The all-in-one platform reduces tool switching. Reviewers value having RMM, ticketing, remote access, and automation in one dashboard. Atera’s 95% ease of doing business with score supports that consolidated experience.
• Per-technician pricing scales predictably. G2 reviewers like managing unlimited endpoints without added per-device costs, making budgeting easier for MSPs and IT teams with growing fleets.
• AI-assisted automation saves time. Reviewers highlight Atera’s AI tools for speeding up scripting, ticket triage, and routine troubleshooting, helping lean teams reduce manual work.

Cons of Atera as per G2 reviewers:

• Reporting can feel limited for custom needs. G2 reviewers note that built-in dashboards cover everyday visibility, but tailored client reports may require exports. For routine monitoring, reviewers still find the standard reporting useful.
• The mobile experience is lighter than desktop. Based on G2 reviews, advanced scripting and ticket work can be more limited on mobile, though quick checks and status updates remain practical.

Explore firsthand feedback from Atera users. →

7. Action1: Best for patch management

Action1 is a cloud-native autonomous endpoint management platform that combines patching, vulnerability remediation, software deployment, and remote desktop capabilities. Remote support sits within that larger remediation workflow, while 96% scores for both ease of use and ease of admin on G2 suggest that managing those functions remains relatively straightforward.

Key features of Action1:

• Browser-based remote desktop for attended and unattended support
• Remote endpoint access without VPN or on-premises infrastructure
• Automated Windows and third-party application patching
• Real-time vulnerability visibility and compliance reporting
• Role-based access, multi-factor authentication, and audit trails for secure administration

Pros of Action1 as per G2 reviewers:

• Setup is quick and lightweight. Reviewers say endpoints can be enrolled and patched within minutes without VPNs or on-premises infrastructure. Its 97% ease of setup score supports that low-friction experience.
• The free tier offers strong value. Users praise access to the full feature set for up to 200 endpoints at no cost, making Action1 appealing to small businesses, nonprofits, and growing IT teams.
• Patching and remediation are highly automated. Reviewers highlight Windows and third-party patching, strong vulnerability visibility, and compliance tracking that reduce manual endpoint maintenance.

Cons of Action1 as per G2 reviewers:

• Remote desktop can feel sluggish at times. Some G2 reviewers report lag during heavier sessions, but still value having browser-based access built in for quick troubleshooting.
• Reporting is less flexible for custom needs. According to G2 reviews, standard dashboards work well for patch and compliance tracking, though deeper reporting may take more manual effort.

Explore firsthand feedback from Action1 users. →

8. AirDroid Business: Best for Android device management

AirDroid Business is a device management platform for remotely monitoring, accessing, controlling, and maintaining business endpoints, with particularly strong Android coverage and growing Windows capabilities. Its remote-support toolkit includes unattended control, device monitoring, file management, and troubleshooting, backed by a 94% mobile device access score on G2.

Key features of AirDroid Business:

• Unattended remote access and control for Android devices
• Real-time device monitoring with alerts and automated workflows
• Remote camera, voice chat, and Black Screen Mode for support sessions
• Remote file management and secure content transfer across endpoints
• Windows patch management with scheduled deployment and reboot controls

Pros of AirDroid Business as per G2 reviewers:

• Support helps smooth out deployment. G2 reviewers praise responsive guidance, onboarding, and documentation, which aligns with AirDroid Business’s 98% quality of support score.
• Centralized control cuts on-site troubleshooting. Reviewers value monitoring, accessing, and resolving issues from one dashboard, with unattended control and real-time device monitoring supporting remote intervention.
• Windows patching reduces routine update work. Reviewers highlight scheduled patching and compliance visibility, while automated detection, deployment, reboot management, and reporting help streamline remediation.

Cons of AirDroid Business as per G2 reviewers:

• Device coverage is most developed for Android and Windows environments than iOS-heavy environments. A few users on G2 note that management centers on Android and Windows, but that focused coverage still works well for teams primarily supporting those platforms.
• Costs rise as deployments scale. Reviewers flag higher spend with more devices or advanced features, but the entry price remains $1/device/month billed annually, with broader functionality available on higher tiers.

Explore firsthand feedback from AirDroid Business users. →

Frequently asked questions about remote support software

Have more questions? Find more answers below.

Q1. What is remote support software?

Remote support software helps IT professionals access, troubleshoot, and manage devices without being physically present. Look for capabilities such as remote control, unattended access, screen sharing, file transfer, remote reboot, monitoring, and security controls when evaluating these platforms.

Q2. What is the best remote access software?

NinjaOne is the best remote access software based on G2’s 2026 Remote Support Software Grid® Report. It has the highest G2 Score among the tools I evaluated, while reviewers also rate its unattended access and remote reboot capabilities highly.

Q3. Which tool is commonly used for remote support?

TeamViewer is one of the most widely reviewed tools in my shortlist, with over 3400 G2 reviews. I’d consider it for teams needing cross-platform remote control, screen sharing, file transfer, and straightforward connections across different devices and operating systems.

Q4. What is the best remote access software for IT support?

I’d look closely at NinjaOne for broader IT support. It combines unattended remote access and remote reboot with patching, monitoring, scripting, and deployment, making it useful when I want remote troubleshooting connected directly to the wider endpoint-management workflow.

Q5. What is the best tool for remote access in Windows?

I’d consider Action1 for Windows-focused environments, particularly when patching and remediation matter alongside remote access. It combines browser-based remote desktop, remote reboot, scripting, and automated Windows patching, although its remote-support capabilities are currently more developed on Windows.

Q6. Which tool is best suited for remote desktop support?

I’d consider TeamViewer well-suited for remote desktop support. Its strengths include screen sharing, remote device control, file transfer, multi-monitor support, and cross-platform connectivity. G2 reviewers also frequently highlight its intuitive interface and quick, straightforward connection process.

Q7. What is the most trusted remote support software by support leaders based on verified user reviews?

Several tools in my evaluation show strong verified-user sentiment. Action1 and AirDroid Business both hold 4.9/5 G2 ratings, while NinjaOne and Zoho Assist have 4.7/5, giving support leaders multiple highly rated options depending on their workflow.

Q8. What is the highest-rated remote support software for measurably reducing average resolution time?

NinjaOne, Atera, and Datto RMM combine remote access with monitoring, automation, and remediation capabilities that G2 reviewers say help reduce repetitive work and streamline everyday troubleshooting, measurably speeding up customer issue resolution time.

Q9. Which remote support solutions maintain high customer satisfaction scores consistently?

Action1 and AirDroid Business have particularly strong satisfaction data, with 100% of users rating them four or five stars. NinjaOne also shows 100% satisfaction, while Zoho Assist, Atera, and JumpCloud follow closely based on the G2 data I evaluated.

Q10. What is the most reliable remote support software based on reviews from customer support teams?

I’d look at TeamViewer when dependable remote sessions are a priority. G2 reviewers frequently describe its core remote-control experience as stable and reliable, while screen sharing, file transfer, multi-monitor support, and cross-platform connectivity make it practical for ongoing support workflows.

Q11. What are the top remote support vendors with strong mobile and cross-platform support?

AirDroid Business stands out for mobile device access, scoring 94% on G2, particularly around Android-focused management. For broader operating-system coverage, I’d consider TeamViewer and JumpCloud, which both receive strong Multi-Platform Support scores from G2 reviewers.

Q12. Which remote support software integrates knowledge base resources into the workflow?

Datto RMM comes closest among the tools I evaluated through its broader Kaseya ecosystem. G2 reviewers value integrations with IT Glue and Autotask, which can surface documentation, credentials, and ticket context within technicians’ workflows and reduce unnecessary tool switching.

Q13. What are the best remote support platforms with co-browsing and screen sharing capabilities?

I’d put TeamViewer and Zoho Assist high on the list for screen sharing, with both scoring 94% on G2. Zoho Assist also appears in G2’s Co-Browsing category, making it especially relevant when interactive, visual support is important.

Q14. Which remote support tools reduce support tickets and unnecessary escalations?

JumpCloud stands out here because reviewers say its single sign-on and identity-management capabilities can reduce password-related helpdesk tickets. Its centralized device, access, and security controls also give IT teams more ways to address issues proactively before escalation becomes necessary.

Q15. What are the best remote support platforms for technology support teams?

The best remote support platforms for technology support teams include NinjaOne, TeamViewer, Zoho Assist, JumpCloud, Datto RMM, Atera, Action1, and AirDroid Business. I’d choose among them based on priorities such as endpoint management, screen sharing, usability, administration, automation, mobile support, or ease of deployment.

How did I find and evaluate these remote support tools?

To build this list, I used data from G2’s latest Remote Support Software Grid® Report, verified user reviews, and current product information. I focused on the signals that help IT teams and support professionals compare tools meaningfully, from overall market standing to how well each product supports day-to-day remote troubleshooting.

• I started with G2’s latest Grid® Report for Remote Support Software. I used G2 Score, customer satisfaction, market presence, and review volume to shortlist leading products. Looking at these signals together gave me a more balanced view than relying on ratings alone.
• I analyzed G2 user reviews to understand how each tool performs in practice. I looked for recurring feedback around remote access, screen sharing, unattended support, cross-platform coverage, troubleshooting, setup, administration, performance, and support quality. I also used AI to help analyze a larger volume of reviews and surface repeated strengths, limitations, and use cases.
• I used information available as of August 2026. This includes the G2 ratings, feature and satisfaction scores, reviews, pricing, and product details referenced throughout the article. Since these can change, my evaluation reflects the information available during this period.
• I sourced key features from official vendor websites and product documentation. I focused on capabilities most relevant to remote support, such as remote access, screen sharing, unattended support, file transfer, reboot controls, monitoring, automation, and security.

For a tool to be included in the remote support software category, it should:

• Generate detailed session reports
• Complete administrative tasks remotely
• Allow full remote unattended and attended access to and control of desktops, servers, and laptops
• Allow connection over the internet or an internal network

Fix it from anywhere

After comparing these tools, I’d focus less on who has the longest feature list and more on how well each one fits your support workflow. Some are stronger for screen sharing and quick access, while others bring remote support together with endpoint management, automation, patching, or identity controls.

My advice: choose the tool that helps your team connect faster, troubleshoot with less friction, and manage the devices you actually support.

If endpoint management is also a priority, explore G2’s best remote monitoring and management (RMM) software next.