Nice to meet you.

Enter your email to receive our weekly G2 Tea newsletter with the hottest marketing news, trends, and expert opinions.

Call Me Impressed: 8 Inbound Call Tracking Software I Dialed

February 14, 2025

best inbound call tracking software

I watched it happen in real-time.

A sales rep picked up the phone, ready to close, but the caller sounded impatient. “I already spoke to someone,” they said. My colleague at one of my earlier jobs scrambled: there was no conversation record, and they had no idea which campaign brought them in. That call, which could have closed a high-value deal, became another missed opportunity.

That moment made me realize the importance of using the best inbound call tracking software. We were tracking website visits, email opens, and ad clicks. Yet, every time the phone rang, we had zero visibility into where those leads were coming from or how to follow up effectively.

Recently, I tested the best inbound call tracking software solutions to help you avoid situations like this. I dug into call attribution, analytics, automation, and integrations, which are everything a business needs to turn every call into an opportunity. Here’s what I found. 

My experience with the best inbound call tracking software

I see inbound call tracking software as a tool that helps businesses monitor, analyze, and optimize their phone call interactions. It assigns unique phone numbers to marketing channels like ads, landing pages, or social media so I can see which campaigns drive the most calls. When a customer dials one of these numbers, the software captures details like the caller’s number, location, call duration, and even conversation transcripts. This allows me to understand customer behavior, attribute calls to the right sources, and refine marketing strategies for better ROI.

How did we find and evaluate the best inbound call tracking software?

I explored inbound call tracking software at all levels, from basic tools that log caller details and call volume to advanced platforms with artificial intelligence-powered analytics, call attribution, dynamic number insertion, and customer relationship management system (CRM) integrations. I evaluated their core functionalities, tested them in various marketing and sales environments, and analyzed feedback from businesses to assess real-world effectiveness.

I examined hundreds of G2 reviews, cross-referencing my findings with G2’s Grid Reports to ensure accuracy, usability, efficiency, and overall value. After extensive research and hands-on testing, I’ve compiled a list of the best inbound call tracking software for businesses of all sizes.

For tools I couldn’t test, I consulted professionals with firsthand experience and verified their insights against trusted G2 reviews. The screenshots in this article include a mix of those captured during testing and those sourced from vendor G2 pages.

The best inbound call tracking software should do more than just log calls. It must offer dynamic number insertion (DNI) to track calls based on visitor sessions and provide real-time analytics to identify high-quality leads. Seamless integration with CRMs, Google Analytics, and ad platforms is essential for accurate marketing attribution. I also look for AI-powered call recording and transcription to help sales teams understand conversation trends.

How I evaluated the best inbound call tracking software

Here’s what I considered while testing the best inbound call tracking software solutions. 

  • Dynamic number insertion: I need inbound call tracking software that supports dynamic number insertion to track calls based on user sessions. This ensures I can see which specific marketing source, Google Ads, social media, or organic search, led to a call. Without DNI, I’m stuck with static tracking numbers, which don’t provide the granular insights I need to optimize my campaigns effectively.
  • Call attribution and source tracking: Accurate call attribution is non-negotiable. I need software that tells me exactly which campaign, ad, keyword, or webpage drove each inbound call. Ideally, it should support multi-touch attribution, so I can see the full customer journey instead of just the last touchpoint before a call. The better the attribution, the more effectively I can allocate my marketing budget.
  • CRM and marketing platform integration: Inbound call tracking isn’t useful if it operates in isolation. I need a tool that integrates seamlessly with my CRM, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Ads, and other marketing automation tools. This ensures sales and marketing teams have real-time access to call data, making it easier to follow up on leads and measure ROI accurately.
  • AI-powered call recording and transcription: A good inbound call tracking tool should analyze conversations. AI-driven call recording and transcription allow me to review customer interactions, extract key insights, and even identify patterns in sales calls. If the software includes keyword spotting and sentiment analysis, that’s a huge plus for improving sales strategy.
  • Call routing and IVR capabilities: If your business handles a high volume of inbound calls, you need smart call routing and an interactive voice response (IVR) system. These ensure that calls go to the right department or sales rep based on predefined rules, improving response time and customer experience. Some advanced platforms even use AI to route calls based on intent analysis.
  • Ease of use and customer support: Even the most feature-rich software is useless if it’s too complicated. I look for an intuitive dashboard, simple setup, and easy-to-understand reporting tools. If I ever encounter issues, I want responsive customer support with live chat, phone, and email options, ideally 24/7, especially if my business operates across multiple time zones.

To be included in the inbound call tracking software category, a product must:

  • Create unique tracking phone numbers for various marketing campaigns
  • Link incoming calls and messages to specific ads, campaigns, or keywords
  • Capture and track all inbound calls associated with each tracking number.
  • Deliver real-time analytics and detailed call reports
  • Sync with marketing and sales platforms to analyze lead data and conversion metrics

*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.  

1. CallRail

I appreciate how CallRail helps identify which marketing efforts drive the most calls. Instead of blindly guessing which campaigns are working, I can see concrete data on which ads, keywords, or sources generate phone leads. This feature gives users confidence in marketing spend and helps refine future strategies. They don't have to rely on assumptions or incomplete customer feedback.

One thing I find helpful is that CallRail's AI can summarize conversations. Instead of listening to long call recordings or sifting through transcripts manually, users can quickly get a summary of what happened during a call. This is a huge time-saver, especially when managing multiple calls per day.

I also like how CallRail automatically directs calls to the right team or person. When potential customers call, they don’t want to be transferred multiple times or wait while someone figures out who should handle their request. CallRail’s system ensures callers reach the correct destination quickly, improving their experience. This automatic redirection minimizes lost leads by reducing the risk of unanswered calls. 

Having access to call recordings is incredibly valuable for training and monitoring purposes. If I were managing a sales or customer service team, I could use these recordings to review how representatives handle calls and provide feedback. It’s one thing to coach someone based on general guidelines, but being able to reference actual conversations makes training much more effective.

callrail
One of the biggest challenges in marketing is proving the return on investment. CallRail makes this easier by showing which campaigns, keywords, or ads lead to phone calls. This is especially useful for businesses that rely on calls to convert customers rather than just online forms. Instead of guessing whether a particular ad spend is worth it, I can see clear data showing how many leads are coming from each source.

While CallRail provides powerful insights, getting everything set up properly can take time. I can imagine how frustrating it would be to configure tracking numbers, routing, and other features, especially for someone who isn’t tech-savvy.

It would be frustrating to rely on a call tracking system to find that some calls aren’t recorded or logged properly. If I were analyzing marketing effectiveness, any missing data could distort my conclusions. Even a small percentage of untracked calls could lead to misleading trends or incorrect assumptions.

I like being alerted when important calls come in, but CallRail’s notification system could improve. If I were managing leads in real-time, I’d want to be notified in a way that ensures I never miss a critical call. Some users seem to feel that the current notification system lacks the flexibility or urgency to effectively manage inbound calls.

One thing I’d find useful is a built-in way to follow up on calls automatically, but it seems like CallRail is limited in this area. For example, being able to send a follow-up text or email immediately after a call would be a great feature, but from what I’ve seen, it doesn’t offer as much automation in that regard.

What I like about CallRail:

  • I love how CallRail eliminates the guesswork in marketing. Seeing exactly which campaigns drive calls makes it easier to invest in the right strategies without relying on assumptions.
  • AI-powered call summaries are a huge time saver. Instead of listening to full recordings, I can get a quick rundown of what happened on a call. This makes managing multiple conversations much more efficient.

What G2 users like about CallRail:

“I like that it tracks where our marketing dollars are spent, the return rate for where we should invest more, and what to invest less in. It is very valuable for this. Used for years. It was very easy to set up in my portal that we use for the added numbers. We can call customer support for clarification if needed.”

- CallRail Review, Mary W.
What I dislike about CallRail:
  • Setting up CallRail can be a hassle. Configuring tracking numbers and routing takes time, and I see how someone less tech-savvy might struggle with it. The insights are great, but getting to that point requires patience.
  • Missing call data is a real concern. If even a small percentage of calls aren’t tracked properly, it could throw off my entire marketing analysis. Relying on incomplete data makes it harder to make confident decisions.
What G2 users dislike about CallRail:
“Set up can be time-consuming to be able to track everything you do for marketing.”

- CallRail Review, Michael K.

Want to run a cloud-hosted customer contact center? Explore the best contact center software solutions we tested this year. 

2. Invoca

I appreciate how Invoca delivers real-time data that allows businesses to act immediately on customer insights. This is critical for industries where quick decision-making can improve conversion rates or customer satisfaction. Having immediate access to call data means that marketing and sales teams can adjust strategies without delays.

Training is often a hurdle when implementing new software, but I like that Invoca has a strong process. Users have noted that they could navigate the platform effectively after a brief training session. This suggests that Invoca invests in user education to ensure businesses can hit the ground running. A well-structured training program minimizes downtime and helps teams become proficient faster.

I also like Invoca’s depth of caller insights. It provides meaningful customer intent and behavior data instead of just logging call duration and phone numbers. This level of detail allows you to personalize follow-ups and improve overall customer interactions. The more granular the data, the more valuable it becomes for fine-tuning marketing and sales strategies.

invoca
Some tools start great but become unreliable over time, yet Invoca appears to be a consistent performer. I like that users who have used it for an extended period report continued satisfaction, which speaks to the platform’s reliability.

A major frustration with Invoca is linking inbound calls to actual sales. Not having a clear way to tie calls to revenue can limit the software’s effectiveness for businesses that rely on phone conversions. Call tracking is valuable, but it becomes an incomplete picture if I can’t confidently attribute calls to orders.

One issue that stands out is the lack of built-in support for certain data parameters. This can make it more cumbersome to track specific interactions, forcing users to rely on workarounds. I don’t like how this lack of flexibility in handling custom data slows down workflows and creates additional complications.

What I like about Invoca:

  • I appreciate how Invoca delivers real-time data, allowing businesses to act immediately on customer insights. Quick access to call data helps marketing and sales teams adjust strategies without delays.
  • I like that Invoca provides meaningful caller insights beyond just basic call logs. Having detailed data on customer intent makes it easier to personalize follow-ups and improve interactions.

What G2 users like about Invoca:

“Invoca's Conversation Analytics powered by AI allows deep views into customer interactions using machine learning technology. Invoca allows call tracking, attributes the call conversions to the campaigns that drive them, and results in optimum use of ad dollars. We recently implemented Invoca's affiliate pay-per-call module. This allowed us to track our cost per call and cost per appointment metrics in real-time from the pay-per-call program, which is a huge win for the team as we had to wait 6 weeks earlier to get the cost data.”

- Invoca Review, Jigna D.
What I dislike about Invoca:
  • It’s frustrating that Invoca makes it difficult to tie inbound calls to actual sales. Without a clear way to connect calls to revenue, measuring the true impact of phone conversions is harder.
  • I don’t like that Invoca lacks built-in support for certain data parameters. This limitation forces users to rely on workarounds, making tracking specific interactions more cumbersome.
What G2 users dislike about Invoca:

“The reporting tools can be a bit clunky. We have not found a way to have collaborative custom reports in-platform, as each can only be viewed by the individual owner and shared (not editable). Also, you must wait for an email link to download reports/data rather than going to your computer's files. Deeper integration with Microsoft Search Ads would be nice as well.”

- Invoca Review, Verified User in Marketing and Advertising

Looking for tools to automate outbound calls? Check out the best auto dialers to try. 

3. Ozonetel CloudAgent

I appreciate Ozonetel CloudAgent’s depth of call reports. Having access to detailed call analytics helps understand customer behavior and agent performance. The ability to track specific call trends, such as peak call times or frequently asked queries, allows businesses to optimize their customer service strategy

This inbound call tracking tool ensures that incoming calls are distributed efficiently among agents, minimizing wait times and improving response rates. I like how this feature helps businesses with high call volumes to reduce call congestion and customer frustration. I find it valuable that this system smartly routes calls to the right agent based on set criteria, like their skills or department, making the whole process smoother and more efficient.

Another aspect I find beneficial is the call monitoring feature, which allows supervisors to listen to live calls and provide real-time feedback to agents. This is an essential tool for quality assurance and agent training. Instead of waiting for post-call evaluations, supervisors can intervene and guide agents on a call.

Downtime can be a major issue for businesses relying on inbound calls, but Ozonetel CloudAgent maintains stable operations with minimal service interruptions. A consistently available system means businesses can avoid lost revenue due to missed calls. I find it reassuring that reliability is one of its strong points, especially when dealing with customers who expect immediate assistance.

ozonetel cloudagent
One issue that stands out is call overlapping when there's a surge in inbound calls. It can lead to multiple agents trying to pick up the same call, creating confusion and inefficiencies. This is a significant drawback for businesses that experience peak call times regularly. I find this problematic because it can lead to longer resolution times and potential frustration for customers and agents.

While the reporting feature is strong, some users have noted inconsistencies in certain reports. Reports that do not always reflect accurate or complete data can lead to misguided business decisions. This is concerning because businesses rely heavily on analytics to track performance and identify trends. I would expect call tracking software to deliver precise and reliable reports consistently, so any discrepancies in reporting could undermine trust in the system.

What I like about Ozonetel CloudAgent:

  • I appreciate how Ozonetel CloudAgent provides detailed call reports that help track customer behavior and agent performance. Identifying call trends allows me to make better decisions and optimize service.
  • I like how the system distributes calls based on agent skills or departments, reducing misrouted calls and long wait times. This structured approach makes the process smoother and improves customer satisfaction.

What G2 users like about Ozonetel CloudAgent:

“From my experience, I have been using Ozonetel for over two years with very few complaints. We have hardly faced any issues. One thing worth highlighting is Ozonetel’s service; any complicated issue can be resolved within minutes.

Accessing Ozonetel is smooth, with no bugs or issues while using it. Calls connect easily; we haven’t received any complaints about call connectivity. I would recommend Ozonetel CloudAgent to companies.”

- Ozonetel CloudAgent Review, Bhavana N.
What I dislike about Ozonetel CloudAgent:
  • I find it frustrating that multiple agents may attempt to pick up the same call during peak hours, causing confusion. This inefficiency leads to delays and affects overall productivity.
  • I rely on reports for decision-making, so it's concerning when data inconsistencies appear. If reports aren’t accurate, I have to double-check numbers manually, which wastes time.
What G2 users dislike about Ozonetel CloudAgent:

“There are issues with the software. When an agent is on call, the dashboard still shows idle status. There is a restriction on downloading the data; at a time, only two months' data can be downloaded.”

- Ozonetel CloudAgent Review, Ritu L.

Want to ace customer interactions? Learn how building a customer interaction strategy helps you improve customer satisfaction.

4. WhatConverts

I like how well WhatConverts attributes leads. It tracks calls and provides detailed insights into where those leads originated. This clarity makes it much easier to understand which marketing channels perform best. Optimizing campaigns can feel like a guessing game without this kind of insight. Knowing which ads, keywords, or sources drive quality leads is a huge advantage.

Many tracking tools offer overly complex reports or require extra work to decipher, but WhatConverts makes it easy. Clear and straightforward reporting means marketers like me can act on data quickly rather than wasting time interpreting it. I appreciate this ability to see which leads are high quality.

I also like WhatConverts’ accurate lead tracking tools. WhatConverts appears to be consistent in delivering reliable data. A system that doesn’t drop calls or misattribute leads is crucial for businesses that rely on phone inquiries.

whatconverts
While WhatConverts is considered cost-effective, some users mention that pricing can be tricky to understand. It’s not always immediately clear how costs scale with usage, which can be frustrating for businesses that need predictability in their expenses.

WhatConverts does a great job tracking leads but doesn’t function like a full CRM. Some businesses may want more built-in client management features rather than relying on a separate CRM. While I don’t find this necessarily a downside for those already using an established CRM, those looking for an all-in-one solution might find it lacking.

WhatConverts appears to be designed primarily for U.S.-based businesses, which could be a limitation for international users. Minor inconveniences like phone number formatting, support hours, or region-specific features might not be well-suited to global businesses.

What I like about WhatConverts:

  • I appreciate how WhatConverts tracks calls and shows where my leads come from. Instead of guessing which marketing efforts work, I get concrete data. This makes refining my campaigns and focusing on what brings in high-quality leads much easier.
  • Many tools overwhelm me with complex reports, but WhatConverts keeps things clear. I don’t have to spend extra time trying to interpret my data.

What G2 users like about WhatConverts:

“We spent a lot of time and effort researching numerous tools for conversion tracking. Most of the other tools we tested did one or two things well but could not track all types of conversions we needed. We love that WhatConverts tracks phone calls, form submissions, chats, purchases, appointments, and more. Additionally, it's really helpful that their system has so many third-party integrations with extensive setup documentation. Additionally, support is exceptionally responsive to our requests or questions.”

- WhatConverts Review, Ben S.
What I dislike about WhatConverts:
  • While WhatConverts is cost-effective, I don’t like how tricky the pricing can be. It’s not always obvious how the costs scale, which makes budgeting harder.
  • WhatConverts tracks leads well, but it doesn’t replace a full CRM. If I need deeper client management features, I must integrate another tool.
What G2 users dislike about WhatConverts:

“At this stage, we don't have much to discuss regarding dislikes. Initially, we found their pricing confusing, but it makes much more sense once we dive in.”

- WhatConverts Review, Donovan R.

5. CallTrackingMetrics

I like CallTrackingMetrics’ ability to attribute calls effectively. It can pinpoint whether a call came from paid ads, organic search, or other sources, providing detailed insights into campaign performance. This level of attribution helps marketers like me fine-tune their marketing strategies without relying on guesswork.

The software provides dedicated call analytics with a clear view of customer interactions. It’s not just about counting calls but understanding caller behavior, duration, and patterns that indicate trends. I appreciate this granularity level because it helps adjust real-time customer experience strategies based on actual call data.

Knowing where a caller is located can be incredibly useful, especially for businesses operating in multiple regions. CallTrackingMetrics provides location-based insights that help identify which areas generate the most engagement. This information is crucial for businesses looking to expand or optimize local advertising efforts.

I appreciate how CallTrackingMetrics allows businesses with a single phone line to benefit from tracking capabilities. Instead of juggling multiple numbers, a single line can still provide useful call insights. This makes it easier to track performance without the complexity of managing multiple tracking numbers.

calltrackingmetrics
While the software is feature-rich, the onboarding and setup process can be slower than anticipated. Some users have reported that it took months longer than initially promised to get everything running smoothly. I understand why this delay can be frustrating, especially for businesses that need a tracking solution up and running quickly.

Despite its capabilities, CallTrackingMetrics doesn’t seem to have strong enough filtering to block spam calls effectively. I dislike how this can be an issue for businesses that receive a high volume of unwanted calls, as it skews reporting metrics. Having to filter out spam calls manually adds an extra layer of work that could be avoided with better call screening.

While CallTrackingMetrics offers strong tracking features, there are limits to how much it can be customized without API access. Some businesses may need deeper customization options to fit their specific workflows, which can be more challenging and require workarounds without an open API.

What I like about CallTrackingMetrics:

  • I like how CallTrackingMetrics accurately attributes calls to different sources, such as paid ads and organic search. This helps me analyze campaign performance with confidence.
  • I find the location tracking feature incredibly useful for businesses targeting specific regions. It provides clarity on which areas generate the most engagement.

What G2 users like about CallTrackingMetrics:

“The detailed call analytics provide clear insights into which campaigns drive calls and customer engagement. We can easily track the ROI of our marketing efforts. The call recording feature has been useful for training and quality control. It allows us to review calls to ensure customer service standards are met. It integrates well with our CRM, making it a convenient option for our users, especially given how frequently it is used. We could set up different phone numbers for different campaigns using customizable tracking numbers. This made it easier to identify which strategies were effective. Customer support has been excellent, as we receive clear answers to our questions and prompt assistance in resolving issues.”

- CallTrackingMetrics Review, Loganathan V.
What I dislike about CallTrackingMetrics:
  • Setting up CallTrackingMetrics can take longer than expected, which can be frustrating. I understand that businesses want to start tracking calls as soon as possible. Delays in implementation mean delays in optimizing marketing efforts.
  • I dislike that spam calls can still clutter reports and skew data accuracy. Businesses that receive frequent unwanted calls may find this a hassle.
What G2 users dislike about CallTrackingMetrics:

“The learning curve can be challenging for users unfamiliar with call tracking analytics. Small businesses with limited budgets may also find the pricing too expensive.”

- CallTrackingMetrics Review, Supriya R.

6. Vonage Contact Center (formerly NewVoiceMedia)

I like Vonage Contact Center’s competitive international calling rates. While inbound call tracking is often tied to domestic operations, having a reliable and cost-effective way to handle international calls is a game-changer. It ensures I don’t have to worry about excessive charges when dealing with customers from other countries. 

This platform uses AI-driven analytics to handle inbound calls more efficiently. I find it impressive that AI can assist in call routing, sentiment analysis, and even automated responses, which can reduce human workload. AI-driven insights mean I better understand customer interactions and identify trends and areas that need improvement. This takes inbound call tracking to another level because it provides data-driven decisions rather than just recording call logs. 

The ability to handle high call volumes efficiently is critical, and Vonage Contact Center appears to be well-equipped for this. I appreciate that businesses with a high influx of inbound calls won’t experience lags or dropped calls due to system overload. This reliability ensures customer satisfaction and prevents missed opportunities from calls not being connected properly.

Vonage Contact Center allows for detailed customization of call flows, making it easier to direct customers to the right department or agent. I can see how this would be particularly beneficial for businesses dealing with complex customer service inquiries.

vonage
Some users have mentioned experiencing issues with messaging functions, which can be a drawback for businesses that rely on omnichannel communication. If inbound call tracking software is expected to integrate seamlessly with SMS or other messaging platforms, reliability in this area is necessary. I dislike that inconsistent messaging features could lead to missed messages or delayed responses, negatively impacting customer experience. 

While Vonage Contact Center has powerful AI-driven capabilities, I can see how some businesses might struggle with the learning curve. The more advanced features might not be immediately intuitive, requiring training or additional resources to use effectively.

Customer support is crucial when dealing with inbound call tracking software, and Vonage Contact Center appears to have some gaps in this area. I can see how frustrating it would be if issues arise and immediate support isn’t available. Timely assistance is critical, especially for businesses relying on continuous customer communication.

What I like about Vonage Contact Center:

  • I like that Vonage Contact Center efficiently handles high call volumes without lag or dropped connections. This ensures a smooth experience for both businesses and customers, preventing missed opportunities
  • The customizable call flows in Vonage Contact Center make directing inbound calls much more efficient. I can see how this feature would benefit businesses dealing with complex customer service needs.

What G2 users like about Vonage Contact Center:

“Vonage Contact Center offers a robust integration with Salesforce, making managing and tracking customer interactions easier within a unified platform. The tool's real-time call monitoring and reporting features are helpful, allowing our team to maintain high service standards. Additionally, the ease of use and straightforward implementation process meant that our team could quickly get up to speed without extensive training. The customer support is responsive and has helped resolve issues promptly, which is crucial in maintaining our operations.”

- Vonage Contact Center (formerly NewVoiceMedia) Review, Anshika S.
What I dislike about Vonage Contact Center:
  • A few users have reported issues with Vonage’s messaging functions, which makes omnichannel communication less reliable. Delayed or missed messages can create unnecessary frustration for businesses and customers.
  • Some businesses might find the learning curve for Vonage Contact Center’s advanced features challenging. While AI-driven tools are powerful, they require time and training to use effectively.
What G2 users dislike about Vonage Contact Center:

“The wait time for a customer is a bit too long, especially when the customer care is meant to be there for the customer immediately when required.”

- Vonage Contact Center (formerly NewVoiceMedia) Review, Arshdev S.

7. Ringover

I like Ringover’s call quality. A strong and stable connection makes a significant difference when handling customer inquiries. Clear conversations reduce misunderstandings, ensuring you can provide accurate information without asking customers to repeat themselves. Many providers struggle with maintaining consistent audio clarity, but knowing that Ringover prioritizes this aspect gives me confidence in its reliability. 

I also appreciate that Ringover offers call transcriptions, which can be extremely helpful for tracking conversations without the hassle of manual note-taking. Reviewing past calls becomes much easier when you have a text record to refer to. Even if the transcription isn't perfect, it still provides a solid reference point for analyzing interactions.

One thing I find particularly useful is how fast Ringover can be implemented. Some call tracking systems require a lengthy setup process, but if I can get started quickly, that’s a major advantage. A shorter setup time means I don’t have to put operations on hold or deal with excessive onboarding procedures. Many software solutions claim to be easy to install but end up requiring additional technical support, so having a truly quick implementation process is a relief.

ringover
One issue I see is the accuracy of its call transcriptions. While having a written record of calls is helpful, it becomes more of a hassle than a benefit if the transcription contains frequent errors. Misinterpretations can lead to misunderstandings, and I wouldn’t want to rely on a flawed transcript when making important business decisions. Some industries require precise documentation, and if I can’t trust the accuracy of these records, I might have to double-check everything manually.

Call connection issues, though not constant, can be problematic when they occur. Even if Ringover generally provides good call quality, occasional connectivity problems can disrupt business operations. Dropped calls or delays in audio can make it difficult to have smooth conversations with customers. If a call disconnects unexpectedly, I might spend extra time following up or reassuring a frustrated customer.

Managing inbound call tracking settings can also be more complicated than I would prefer. If configuring call routing or adjusting tracking parameters takes too many steps, it slows me down. A well-designed system should allow me to make quick changes without requiring extensive technical knowledge. While I appreciate advanced features, they should be accessible without unnecessary complexity.

What I like about Ringover:

  • Ringover’s strong and stable connection ensures clear conversations, reducing misunderstandings. This makes handling customer inquiries smoother and more efficient. Knowing that call quality is a priority gives me confidence in its reliability.
  • Setting up Ringover is fast and hassle-free compared to other call tracking systems. A shorter onboarding process means I can start using it without disrupting operations.

What I like about Ringover:

“The best thing about Ringover, above all else, is the call quality; I've used other systems, and the call quality has been atrocious. I haven't had any issues with Ringover. Secondly, it's easy to set up on desktop and mobile, so I can answer business calls anywhere. Lastly, it integrates with my CRM perfectly, enabling me to click-to-dial contacts on the platform without dialing the numbers out.”

- Ringover Review, Verified User in Staffing and Recruiting
What I dislike about Ringover:
  • While call transcriptions are useful, frequent errors can make them unreliable. Misinterpretations in transcripts could lead to misunderstandings or incorrect information.
  • Even with generally strong call quality, occasional connection problems can be disruptive. If reliability fluctuates, I might need backup solutions to maintain smooth communication.
What G2 users dislike about Ringover:

“Sometimes the transcript makes a few errors, but nothing major.”

- Ringover Review, Josh F.

8. 800.com

I love how 800.com's toll-free number gives businesses a more established and credible image. You can also get a custom number that aligns with your brand, making it easier for clients to remember. It’s a simple yet effective way to improve customers' perception of your business.

You don’t have to worry about missing important calls because 800.com ensures that calls are forwarded properly. I appreciate their consistent forwarding ratio and the fewer dropped calls. This reliability is crucial, especially when dealing with high-value leads or urgent customer inquiries. Knowing that your business calls will reach you no matter where you are is a major advantage.

Their system is also flexible regarding setting up a toll-free number. You don’t feel restricted to a standard setup, which makes it easier to tailor the service to your business needs. Whether you need a vanity number or specific routing options, you have the ability to set things up in a way that works best for me. I appreciate how this flexibility lets customers experiment with different call-handling options to optimize customer interactions. 

800com
One downside I’ve noticed is that 800.com can be more expensive than other pay-as-you-go services. While the features are useful, the pricing might not be ideal for businesses needing occasional call tracking. Some competitors offer more budget-friendly options, making you consider whether you are getting the best value for your needs. 

I understand why verification rules exist for setting up a toll-free number, but the process can feel a bit restrictive. There are certain compliance requirements that you have to meet, and it can be a hassle if I need to make changes. If you don’t follow the exact process, you risk delays in getting the number set up properly. It would be helpful if there were a more streamlined way to verify information without unnecessary back-and-forth. 

What I like about 800.com:

  • I love how 800.com helps businesses appear more credible and established with a toll-free number. A professional number makes your business seem more trustworthy, which can be a huge advantage when attracting new customers.
  • I appreciate that 800.com ensures your calls are forwarded properly without unnecessary disruptions. Consistent call forwarding means you don’t have to worry about missing important business calls. 

What G2 users like about 800.com:

“800.com has outstanding customer service and offers the best products to their customers. They allow smaller businesses to instantly gain credibility by offering 800 numbers, including 800 vanity numbers, at great value. Plus, they'll respond promptly and provide the right solution for any issues. 800.com is an instrumental part of any organization's communications and contact system.”

- 800.com Review, Arziki P.
What I dislike about 800.com:
  • One drawback I’ve noticed is that 800.com can be more expensive than some other pay-as-you-go options.
  • I understand why verification rules exist for setting up a toll-free number, but the process can be frustrating. There are certain compliance requirements that I have to follow, and if I need to make changes, it can turn into a hassle.
What G2 users dislike about 800.com:

“While the service is good, it is slightly more expensive than some competitors, which might be a consideration for small businesses on a tight budget.”

- 800.com Review, Boris V.

Best inbound call tracking software: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

1. What is the best software for call tracking?

CallRail, Invoca, and Ozonotel CloudAgent are the best call tracking software solutions. 

2. What is the best inbound call tracking software for Android?

For inbound call tracking on Android, CallRail is a top choice, offering comprehensive call tracking and analytics features. CallTrackingMetrics is another excellent option, providing robust call management and tracking capabilities. Additionally, WhatConverts offers a user-friendly interface with powerful call tracking functionalities suitable for marketers and agencies.

3. What is the best Call tracking software for lead generation?

For effective lead generation, CallRail offers comprehensive call tracking and analytics to optimize marketing campaigns. Similarly, CallTrackingMetrics provides robust call management features, aiding in efficient lead tracking and conversion.

4. How does inbound call tracking work?

Inbound call tracking assigns unique phone numbers to marketing campaigns, channels, or sources. When a customer calls one of these numbers, the system records details like the caller’s number, call duration, and source. Advanced software can analyze call data, track conversions, and integrate with CRM tools. This helps businesses measure marketing effectiveness and optimize lead generation strategies.

5. What are the best free inbound call tracking apps?

For free inbound call tracking, CallRail offers a comprehensive free trial with features like call recording and analytics. Ringba provides a free plan suitable for businesses seeking basic call tracking capabilities. Additionally, Nimbata offers a free tier with essential call tracking functionalities.

Turn every ring into revenue

Inbound call tracking software is the missing link in a data-driven sales and marketing strategy. The days of guessing where leads come from or scrambling for context mid-conversation should be long gone. With the right software, every call becomes an opportunity, every lead a traceable asset, and every conversation a chance to close confidently.

However, not all inbound call tracking solutions are built the same. When choosing one, consider your business’s needs: do you require in-depth analytics or basic call attribution? Will you benefit from AI-powered insights, call recording, or CRM integrations? And most importantly, is the pricing aligned with the value you’ll get? The best inbound call tracking solution is the one that tracks calls and helps you turn them into real business growth.

Want to automate customer experience across all channels? Learn how the best customer journey analytics solutions help you execute customer behavior-driven strategies.


Get this exclusive AI content editing guide.

By downloading this guide, you are also subscribing to the weekly G2 Tea newsletter to receive marketing news and trends. You can learn more about G2's privacy policy here.