Finding the best cloud compliance software gets a lot harder when your environment won’t sit still. I’ve watched teams with strong security habits still get burned by cloud sprawl, configuration drift, and sensitive data popping up in places no one expected, usually right before an audit or a customer review.
The pressure isn’t just to pass SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR once a year anymore. Security, compliance, and cloud owners are expected to prove continuous compliance, spot gaps fast, and fix what matters most across multi-cloud setups without drowning in manual evidence work.
I evaluated these tools with a practical lens: which ones actually reduce audit fire drills, strengthen governance, surface sensitive data risks, continuously monitor compliance, and make remediation realistic for busy teams.
To build this list, I leaned on G2 GridReports and user reviews to see what real users trust. Then I paired that with my own research into how each platform handles core cloud compliance capabilities like governance, sensitive data compliance, compliance monitoring, cloud gap analytics, and security auditing.
Based on that blend, here are the five best cloud compliance software tools for 2026: Vanta, Drata, Wiz, Scrut Automation, and Sprinto.
*These cloud compliance software are top-rated in their category, according to the G2 Fall Grid Report. All offer custom pricing and a demo on request.
Here’s a quick comparison table that shows how each platform stacks up in terms of G2 feature ratings on the core cloud compliance capabilities you care about most: governance and policy management, sensitive data compliance, continuous compliance monitoring, cloud gap analytics, and security auditing.
| Software | Governance | Sensitive data compliance | Compliance monitoring | Cloud gap analytics | Security auditing |
| Vanta | 92% | 91% | 95% | 88% | 94% |
| Drata | 91% | 89% | 95% | 87% | 95% |
| Wiz | 88% | 86% | 91% | 90% | 93% |
| Scrut Automation | 96% | 96% | 96% | 96% | 98% |
| Sprinto | 94% | 94% | 96% | 92% | 95% |
From what I learned, cloud compliance software helps teams keep their cloud environments aligned with security and regulatory requirements as they change in real time. Instead of relying on periodic manual checks, these tools continuously scan your cloud and connected apps for misconfigurations, policy drift, and risky access or data handling. They also map controls to frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR, and automate evidence collection so audits don’t turn into last-minute fire drills.
Based on my research, what makes a cloud compliance platform the best is how well it handles compliance day to day, not just at audit time. The top tools combine strong governance and policy management, sensitive data discovery and compliance, continuous monitoring, clear gap analytics with risk prioritization, and audit-ready reporting. Just as important, they fit into real workflows (ticketing, SIEM, CI/CD) so teams can remediate quickly instead of getting buried in alerts.
G2 Data backs up why these platforms are becoming table stakes across organizational sizes: users report an estimated ROI or payback period of about 12 months, which shows that the cost of manual compliance adds up quickly. And adoption isn’t limited to one segment. These tools serve small businesses (35%), mid-market teams (37%), and enterprises (28%), reflecting how cloud compliance pressure hits everyone, just at different scales.
I started with G2’s Grid® Reports to build a shortlist of the top cloud compliance platforms based on G2 Score, user satisfaction, and overall market presence.
Next, I dug into G2 reviews at scale using AI to spot the patterns that matter most in real-world cloud compliance. I looked for consistent feedback around governance and policy management, sensitive data compliance, continuous compliance monitoring, cloud gap analytics, and security auditing plus how well each tool works across multi-cloud setups without overwhelming teams with noise.
Reviews helped me separate “check-the-box compliance” from platforms that actually prevent drift, prioritize risk, and make remediation manageable. Finally, I cross-checked vendor websites and spoke with peers who’ve worked with these tools. It helped validate themes I saw in the reviews and gave me a clearer picture of usability, rollout experience, and the impact of these platforms.
The screenshots in this article come from G2 vendor profiles and publicly available product documentation.
After combing through G2 Data and comparing it with what I’ve seen play out for security, compliance, and cloud teams, I kept running into the same set of deal-breakers that separate “audit helper” tools from platforms you can actually trust day to day.
No tool is flawless across every criterion. But the best cloud compliance software shows steady strength where it matters most in real environments: reliable cloud coverage, accurate and context-rich detections, fast root-cause clarity, strong integrations, and the ability to keep working as your cloud footprint and compliance scope grow.
The list below contains genuine user reviews from the Cloud Compliance software category. To be included in this category, a solution must:
*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.
G2 rating: 4.6/5
No conversation on compliance goes without Vanta, and I can see why it keeps landing as #1 cloud compliance software on G2. At its core, Vanta is a compliance automation platform that helps teams map controls to major frameworks, pull evidence continuously from cloud and SaaS systems, and stay audit-ready year-round.
When I dug through G2 reviews and Grid signals, the story was pretty consistent: people rely on Vanta to make compliance an ongoing habit instead of a once-a-year scramble, especially for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 in fast-moving environments. It's one of the best platforms for automating cloud compliance audits
What users like most comes through loudly in the highest-rated feature set. compliance monitoring scores 95%, security auditing 94%, and policy enforcement 93%, which lines up with what reviewers keep describing: Vanta connects to AWS, Okta, Google Workspace, GitHub, Slack, and a huge list of other tools, then starts collecting access logs, config snapshots, and control evidence automatically.
Multiple people mention how that shift alone stops the “screenshot chase” and frees them up to focus on fixing gaps instead of proving they exist. I also saw a lot of love for the structure Vanta brings with policy templates, guided task checklists, cross-framework control reuse, and a clear control health view that’s easy to share during audits or customer RFPs.
That ease factor is backed by the satisfaction ratings: ease of use sits at 92%, ease of admin at 92%, ease of setup at 91%, and quality of support at 93%.
Another thing that stood out to me is how broad Vanta’s real-world footprint is. The top industries represented by the computer software sector, IT and services, financial services, hospital and health care (47), and marketing and advertising (30)are basically a map of where cloud compliance pressure hits hardest. Reviewers across those segments kept pointing to the same payoff: continuous visibility into posture, clear ownership of controls, and faster, calmer audits.
Based on G2 reviews, teams wanting very granular role/permission controls may find that the deepest access management options sit in higher plan tiers. I also saw several people praise the breadth of integrations, but teams running older or less common tools may find they’ll supplement with a bit of manual evidence until coverage catches up.
Putting it all together, Vanta earns its place among the best cloud compliance software because it delivers the kind of day-to-day reliability teams actually need, like automated evidence, always-on monitoring, solid cross-framework mapping, and a workflow that keeps compliance moving without constant handholding.
If you want a platform that makes audits feel routine and gives you a posture you can confidently show customers anytime, Vanta is one of the strongest bets out there.
"I have been using Vanta for about two years mainly for SOC II, and I find it extremely valuable because it provides a comprehensive platform that guides me through certifications, policies, controls, and also offers pen testing and monitoring. What I like most about Vanta is its capability to make the daunting task of achieving certifications much more manageable. It simplifies the establishment of new processes, policies, and documentation while integrating seamlessly with existing systems to highlight security aspects. Vanta gives me a full overview at any given time, enhancing our oversight capabilities. The integrations with cloud infrastructure are particularly helpful, as Vanta thoroughly checks large environments for security issues, vulnerabilities in container images, and other aspects, demonstrating its extensive and reliable functionality. Setting up Vanta was also fairly easy, which I appreciate. These features collectively make it an invaluable tool for our team."
- Vanta review, Kjetil H.
"There isn’t much to dislike, but sometimes the integrations can take a bit of time to sync or need a quick refresh to show the latest data. A few more customization options in reporting and dashboard views would also be nice to have. Overall, though, it’s a solid platform that does its job really well."
- Vanta review, Deepthi S.
If you’re also evaluating compliance, check out G2’s roundup of the best GRC software to manage governance, risk, and compliance with ease.
G2 rating: 4.8/5
Drata is another popular and well-known compliance software, especially for cloud-first teams that want audit readiness without living in spreadsheets. As a matter of fact, Drata is one of the top tools for ensuring cloud compliance with GDPR and HIPAA, along with Vanta, Scrut Automation, and Sprinto.
From what I read, Drata automates evidence collection from your cloud and SaaS stack, maps controls across frameworks like SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and keeps those controls monitored continuously so you can spot drift early.
What jumped out to me right away in the G2 data is how strongly users rate the day-to-day experience. The quality of support is rated at 97%, ease of use at 93%, meeting requirements at 94%, ease of administration at 93%, ease of doing business with at 97%, and ease of setup at 92%.
That lines up with the review themes I saw: people keep saying Drata feels intuitive, prescriptive, and easy to ramp on — even for smaller orgs or one-person GRC teams. Users love that auditors can work directly inside the platform, create evidence requests there, and cut out the messy back-and-forth that used to happen in ticketing systems. I also saw a lot of appreciation for multi-framework control mapping and “no-bloat” workflows that help teams reduce overlap instead of re-doing the same checks across every standard.
Feature-wise, Drata’s strengths look very “cloud compliance core.” Security auditing and compliance monitoring are both rated 95%, and SSO comes in at 94%. Reviews reinforce that: continuous monitoring, automated tests, and integrations with AWS, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, GitHub, Jira, Slack, and other staples do a lot of the heavy lifting.
Once the connectors are live, Drata quietly pulls evidence in the background, surfaces gaps clearly, and gives them a clean posture view they can trust during audits, board updates, or customer security reviews. The Trust Center and SafeBase tie-in also gets called out as a useful way to share security posture externally without rebuilding a portal from scratch.
Drata’s footprint lines up with the kinds of teams it’s clearly built to serve. You see it show up most in cloud-native software and IT-heavy environments, with strong traction in regulated spaces like finance and healthcare, too.
Based on the G2 reviews I looked at, Drata gets a lot of praise for its broad set of integrations. Teams with niche SaaS apps or older systems might still want to plan for a bit of hands-on evidence work at the edges while those connectors catch up, although this flexibility allows them to adapt integrations without compromising core stability.
Users also like how prescriptive the platform is, though teams wanting more clarity, like extra documentation, deeper “why this test failed” context, or clearer guidance on what to tackle first, might wish for a little more explanation built into the workflow. The current design keeps the experience lightweight and action-oriented.
On the whole, if you’re a fast-growing SaaS business, a lean security/compliance team, or a mid-market org that needs multi-framework readiness without hiring a giant GRC function, Drata is a really strong fit.
"As a relatively small organisation, Drata has truly been a game-changer for us. Without a large compliance team, we have still been able to make steady progress toward our compliance goals, thanks to the platform. Working alongside a responsive auditing partner, we found the initial implementation straightforward and easy to get started with. The automation features for evidence collection and continuous monitoring have saved us countless hours of manual effort. We rely on Drata daily to ensure that any issues are promptly reported to the appropriate team and resolved quickly. We also value how smoothly it integrates with our core tools, such as AWS, Microsoft 365, and Intune, and how it offers clear dashboards and guided workflows that make preparing for audits much less stressful."
- Drata review, Keith B.
"As far as I understand and read, one of Drata’s main goals is to automate controls, but unfortunately, our Background Check and MDM solutions are not currently supported or listed among the available integrations. I would have expected broader vendor support. Yes, Drata offers a Drata agent. This is good, and we can also provide. That said, I’ve already submitted requests to enable integrations for our existing solutions."
- Drata review, Serdar T.
It depends on what you need. The easiest way to choose is to line them up against your stack and priorities. Check the G2 Vanta vs. Drata compare page for a side-by-side on features and real review patterns.
G2 rating: 4.7/5
I keep seeing Wiz show up as a default shortlist pick among top-rated cloud compliance tools for large enterprises that want a clean, real-time view of risk across their cloud stacks. In fact, Wiz is one of the best cloud compliance software for multi-cloud environments.
At a high level, it’s an agentless CNAPP/CSPM tool that connects to your cloud environments, inventories assets, and maps issues across misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, identities, secrets, and compliance gaps in one place. After digging through the G2 reviews you shared and cross-checking product info, I get why it shows up so often in “best cloud compliance software” conversations.
What jumps out first in the review data is how frequently users talk about visibility without friction. People like that Wiz can light up a full cloud environment quickly, without agents, and then show risk in context instead of a giant flat list.
Reviewers keep coming back to the security graph and prioritization angle. Wiz doesn’t just surface findings, it ties them to exposure paths and sensitive data, so teams can focus on what actually matters. You can see that in the G2's highest-rated feature set too: security auditing and SSO are both at 93%, and compliance monitoring is close behind at 91%.
Another theme is how engineer-friendly the platform feels. Multiple reviewers mention dashboards that make daily risk checks almost routine, plus remediation guidance that’s practical for SecOps and DevOps teams working together. I also notice a lot of praise for integrations and workflow fit — users like hooking Wiz into SIEMs, ticketing systems, and existing cloud workflows so findings don’t just sit there. That’s the kind of stuff that makes compliance feel less like paperwork and more like a living system.
While many users praise Wiz for its depth and extensive cloud security capabilities, reviewers also note that the platform can feel complex to manage out of the box, especially around alert tuning and configurations. Teams might need to adjust policies and fine-tune notifications so they don’t become overwhelming. However, once connected, Wiz surfaces an exceptionally broad set of insights, giving teams deep visibility across their environment.
Also, Wiz’s depth can come with a learning curve, as the number of features and topics may feel overwhelming at first and take time for teams to navigate confidently
Overall, if you’re a SaaS, fintech, healthcare, or high-growth cloud team that wants to stay continuously audit-ready while also tightening your real security posture, Wiz looks like a very solid fit.
"What I like best about Wiz is the insight, visibility, and overview of issues and vulnerabilities within a cloud environment. Being able to not only track the primary resource of each individual issue, but also to be able to view that in a security graph at a very high level. This type of insight capabilities helps users like me understand the full history of the issue as well as the different access points, and also to be able to integrate these issues/vulnerabilities directly into Jira for direct progress tracking, which improves the workflow of solving them within a timely manner."
- Wiz review, Antwon L.
"The platform is powerful, but the depth of data can feel overwhelming at first — expect a short learning curve to fully utilise its capabilities."
- Wiz review, Shane M.
G2 rating: 4.9/5
Scrut Automation comes across as a very founder-friendly compliance hub: it pulls your policies, controls, evidence, and cloud tests into one place, then automates the busywork around audit readiness so lean security or GRC teams aren’t stuck living in spreadsheets.
From the reviews I read, it’s positioned as both a compliance automation platform and a hands-on partner. People talk about Scrut not just as software, but as a guided path to SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and similar frameworks.
Reviewers repeatedly call out the structured workflows, pre-populated policy templates, and automated evidence collection as the difference between a slow, manual slog and a steady, trackable program. That’s backed up by the satisfaction snapshot I saw: ease of use, ease of setup, and ease of admin are all sitting in the high-90s, and “ease of doing business with” is basically a love letter at 99%.
On the feature side, security auditing and data security both score 98%, with governance right behind at 97%, which lines up with the way users describe the product: strong at turning messy, multi-framework work into an organized, audit-ready system.
It's noticeable how often people highlight the humans behind the platform. Customer success managers and compliance consultants get lots of specific shout-outs for weekly check-ins, helping teams interpret requirements, and keeping the certification timeline moving. For smaller orgs or first-time compliance owners, that kind of embedded coaching seems to be part of the value prop as much as the automation itself.
And adoption looks most concentrated in the G2 Data I looked at: Computer software, IT services, and financial services, with a smaller but visible presence in healthcare and HR, basically the industries that live and die by audit speed, customer trust, and regulated data.
Scrut offers a breadth of integrations and cloud automations, and teams running less common stacks sometimes describe a bit of extra manual handling until every connector matches their environment perfectly, but the system remains flexible enough to accommodate varied infrastructures
Similarly, a lot of reviewers appreciate how many modules Scrut packs in, and teams that want a super lightweight, minimal-surface UI for occasional stakeholders might plan for a little onboarding so those users feel confident navigating all the sections.
Overall, if you’re a startup or scaling company building SOC 2/ISO readiness with a small security or GRC crew, or you want a tool that pairs solid software with real guidance, Scrut looks like a very safe bet, in my view.
"Scrut gave us a very clear step-by-step view of what was needed for ISO and SOC 2. The dashboard made it easy to assign owners, track tasks, and see overall progress without getting lost in spreadsheets.The automation of evidence collection saved us a lot of manual work. For example, pulling security controls from our cloud accounts and tools was seamless, which cut down audit prep time drastically.
I really liked the guidance from the Scrut team. They didn’t just give us a tool, they actively helped us understand what auditors expect and how to prepare properly. The platform keeps everything in one place – policies, tasks, controls, and evidence. It gave us confidence that we were always audit-ready instead of rushing last minute."
- Scrut Automation review, Rehan Ahmed J.
" While the platform is very helpful overall, there is a bit of a learning curve at the beginning, especially for teams new to compliance automation. Some integrations could be deeper to eliminate manual work entirely, and the reporting feature could offer more customization. These are not dealbreakers, but improvements in these areas would make the experience even smoother."
- Scrut Automation review, James A.
G2 rating: 4.8/5
At its core, Sprinto is a cloud compliance and GRC automation tool: you connect your cloud providers and key SaaS systems, Sprinto pulls evidence continuously, maps it to controls and frameworks, and gives you a live view of what’s done, what’s pending, and what needs attention before audit time.
Reading through G2 feedback, the vibe is pretty consistent. People lean on Sprinto as the central hub for audit readiness, especially when they want a guided path instead of piecing it together across docs and tickets.
What users seem to love most is how much Sprinto reduces the “herding cats” part of compliance. Reviewers keep calling out the structured workflows and clear task tracking, plus the way evidence collection runs in the background once integrations are set. That shows up in the product scores too: compliance monitoring is one of Sprinto’s top-rated features, and users also rate security auditing and policy enforcement very highly.
In plain English, teams feel like the platform doesn’t just tell them “be compliant,” it actually helps them stay there day-to-day, with dashboards that surface progress and ownership in a way that’s easy to share internally.
And support is a big part of the story I saw. Sprinto’s satisfaction ratings are sky-high for quality of support, ease of doing business with them, and ease of setup, which tracks with all the shoutouts to hands-on onboarding and fast answers when teams hit a blocker. Even reviewers who say they’re new to formal audits talk about feeling guided instead of overwhelmed.
There’s also a strong “built for modern SaaS” theme in who’s reviewing it. Most feedback comes from software and IT services orgs, with solid representation from regulated sectors like financial services and security-minded teams too.
A lot of users appreciate how broad the integration catalog is and how smoothly the big-name connectors work once they’re live. Teams that want every integration to be instantly plug-and-play, especially for niche tools, may need a little extra setup time or light customization before everything hums along in autopilot mode.
Based on G2 reviews I analyzed, Sprinto is generally stable, though some teams report occasional bugs or performance inconsistencies during day-to-day use. These issues usually require minor workarounds, such as refreshing pages or re-running tasks, rather than disrupting workflows.
Teams seeking a highly polished, low-maintenance experience may want to plan for light monitoring, while those comfortable with occasional troubleshooting are less likely to find this an issue.
On the whole, I’d recommend Sprinto most for cloud-first startups and mid-market SaaS companies that want a guided, automation-heavy path to SOC 2/ISO readiness and ongoing continuous compliance, especially if you value strong human support alongside the software.
"Sprinto makes compliance management much easier by automating repetitive tasks and giving clear visibility into audit readiness. The platform is user-friendly, and it helps track progress in real time and reduces manual effort during ISO or SOC audits.
We would especially like to thank Mr. Dominic Savio for his support in setting up our account. Since we were not familiar with the GRC platform, he guided us from day one and managed the implementation process smoothly, helping us complete all the required tasks efficiently."
- Sprinto review, Zuper I.
"There’s not much to dislike, but if I had to mention something, it would be that some workflows could be streamlined further. Occasionally, certain setup steps or configurations feel a bit manual, and improving automation there would enhance the overall user experience."
- Sprinto review, Quynh N.
Explore the best enterprise risk management platforms on G2 to support your compliance efforts.
Got more questions? G2 has the answers!
Wiz, Drata, and Vanta are the best for tracking cloud compliance across regions because they continuously scan multi-cloud environments and map findings to global frameworks, giving you a live, cross-region risk view in one place.
Scrut Automation, Sprinto, and Vanta are the top platforms for managing cloud compliance documentation since they centralize policies, controls, evidence, and audit trails in a single workspace with structured workflows.
Drata, Vanta, and Sprinto are the top tools for GDPR and HIPAA compliance because they offer prebuilt framework mappings, automated evidence collection, and continuous control monitoring for privacy and healthcare/security requirements.
Wiz is the easiest to deploy for cloud compliance because it’s agentless and connects quickly to cloud accounts. Vanta and Drata are also easy to roll out thanks to guided onboarding and fast connector setup.
Wiz, Scrut Automation, and Sprinto offer real-time monitoring by continuously checking cloud configurations, controls, and evidence status instead of relying on point-in-time audits.
Drata, Vanta, and Scrut Automation are the best for regulated industries since they’re built around audit readiness, evidence rigor, and framework depth that regulated teams need.
Wiz and Drata integrate cloud compliance with security tools most tightly because they connect into security workflows (like ticketing/SIEM paths) and prioritize compliance issues using security context. Vanta also supports strong security-stack integrations for passing evidence cleanly into compliance workflows.
If there’s one takeaway from this guide, it’s that cloud compliance isn’t a once-a-year audit scramble anymore. It’s a living system. The best platforms don’t just help you “pass” frameworks; they help you see risk as it forms, tie it to real cloud context, and keep teams moving in the same direction without drowning in spreadsheets.
So instead of asking “Which tool is best overall?”, the smarter question is “Which tool best fits how my cloud actually runs and how fast my compliance needs to move?” Once you pick based on that reality, the rest gets a lot simpler.
Also managing vendor risk? Explore the best third-party and supplier risk management software to stay ahead of supplier issues and external dependencies.
Security compliance isn’t simple. Between SOC 2 reports, ISO 27001 audits, and GDPR...
by Harshita Tewari
I’m the kind of person who loves a well-organized system.
.png)
by Tanuja Bahirat
Every time I sit down with my InfoSec team, one thing becomes clear: managing governance,...
by Soundarya Jayaraman