7 Best GRC Software I Trust in 2025 for Risk Management

Every time I sit down with my InfoSec team, one thing becomes clear: managing governance, risk, and compliance feels like trying to hit a moving target. Regulations change, risks evolve, and no matter how robust the processes are, something always slips through the cracks. If you’re a compliance officer, risk manager, audit or even a CIO, you know exactly what I mean.

I’ve heard stories of teams buried under spreadsheets, scrambling to respond to audits, or wasting hours tracking down the latest policy updates. That’s probably why you’re here—looking for the best GRC software that can simplify all of that chaos and make your work more efficient.

As someone who writes extensively about cybersecurity and consults with experts in the field, I’ve had a front-row seat to the challenges professionals like you face. That’s why I’ve done the research to identify the 7 best governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) software for 2025. 

In this article, I'll cover everything you need to know about these GRC tools—features, pros, cons, my personal review, and what other users have to say.

Whether you’re trying to streamline audits, gain better insights into risk, or ensure your organization stays compliant, this guide will help you find the right fit for your needs.

7 best GRC software I recommend to simplify compliance 

When I think about governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) software, I see it as a way to bring structure and clarity to the complex task of managing risks and compliance.

I’ve had countless conversations with my security, IT, and compliance teams, and one thing is clear: GRC really comes down to having processes in place to mitigate risk. But the right GRC tools go a step further—they make those processes easier and more efficient.

For example, automation is a huge quality-of-life improvement in GRC software. Instead of manually tracking when a regulatory compliance review is due, identifying gaps in risk assessments, or following up on audit tasks, a good GRC platform does the heavy lifting.

It sends timely reminders when actions need to be taken, like updating policies, conducting risk analyses and compliance audits, or submitting audit reports. It’s like having a guide that walks you through every step of a complex regulatory process, ensuring nothing gets overlooked—similar to how a software installation wizard simplifies setup.

GRC software brings everything under one roof. It ensures policies are followed, risks are managed effectively, and compliance requirements are met—all without the chaos of spreadsheets or scattered tools. For my team, it’s not just about convenience; it provides a clear view of challenges and the confidence to address them efficiently.

My criteria for the best GRC software 

When I evaluated GRC tools, I didn’t just look at surface-level abilities. I took a deep dive into what matters most to InfoSec, compliance, and risk teams, ensuring my criteria were detailed and technical enough to meet their needs. Here’s what I prioritized:

• Ease of use with customization options: In my experience, no matter how advanced a tool is, it won’t deliver value if it’s hard to use. I looked for GRC tools that offered intuitive interfaces and minimal learning curves. At the same time, I wanted software that could adapt to different needs, such as customizable dashboards, workflows, and reporting templates. Flexibility is key because no two organizations have the exact same requirements.
• Automation that reduces manual workloads: One of the biggest pain points my compliance and risk teams shared with me is the time wasted on repetitive tasks. I paid close attention to tools that automate key processes, such as compliance tracking, risk assessment workflows, evidence collection, and external and internal audit task notifications. The ability to set triggers and receive real-time alerts when actions are due stood out as a must-have feature.
• Risk and compliance framework support: It was crucial that the tools support robust risk management capabilities—things like real-time risk identification, scoring models, risk heat maps, and dynamic mitigation tracking. On the compliance side, I checked for compatibility with major frameworks like ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and NIST. Tools that offer automated control mapping, gap analysis, and the ability to cross-reference frameworks were especially valuable.
• Integration with existing systems: I didn’t want tools that operate in isolation. For GRC to work well, it needs to connect with other systems such as ERP software like SAP and Oracle, CRM platforms, security tools like CrowdStrike and Splunk, identity management systems, and ticketing platforms like Jira. I looked for tools with open APIs and pre-built integrations that allowed smooth data sharing across platforms.
• Centralized policy and incident management: Policies are the backbone of compliance, and I evaluated tools that offer centralized storage, version control, automated distribution, and acknowledgment tracking for better policy management. Similarly, for incident management, I prioritized tools that provide real-time incident alerts, detailed root cause analysis, and integration with SIEMs for streamlined security workflows.
• Advanced reporting and visual analytics: My compliance and risk teams often need actionable insights. I focused on tools with powerful reporting capabilities that allow users to generate custom reports, track KPIs, and visualize data through dashboards, heat maps, and risk trends. Tools that offered granular filtering and exportable reports earned extra points in my evaluation.
• Scalability and mobility: As organizations grow, GRC software needs to scale with them. I tested how well the tools could handle increasing numbers of users, complex workflows, and growing data volumes. Mobile accessibility also mattered—teams need to manage risks and compliance on the go, and a tool without responsive design or mobile apps felt outdated.
• Data security and access control: Given how much sensitive information GRC tools handle, I was particularly strict about data security. I looked for role-based access controls, robust encryption, and compliance with global security standards like SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Without these, a tool simply doesn’t pass the bar.
• Audit and vendor risk management: Audits can be a nightmare without the right tools. I prioritized software that simplifies audit planning and execution, such as automated evidence requests, audit scheduling, and real-time tracking. Similarly, tools that support vendor risk assessments, contract monitoring, and dynamic risk scoring for third-party relationships earned higher marks.
• Support, documentation, and cost effectiveness: Finally, I needed tools that come with reliable support, clear documentation, and onboarding assistance. GRC is complex, and poor support can be a dealbreaker. At the same time, I compared pricing models to ensure the tools delivered value for money, especially for teams with tight budgets.

After evaluating 15+ GRC tools, I narrowed my list down to seven. These tools stand out, offering the functionalities, efficiency, and reliability GRC professionals need.

The list below contains genuine user reviews from enterprise risk management software. To be included in this category, a solution must:

• Catalog, assess, and mitigate business-specific risks such as financial or health and safety.
• Provide tools to communicate risks to employees, customers, vendors, and suppliers.
• Create, maintain, and implement corporate policies and rules for internal and external use.
• Maintain an up-to-date repository of laws, regulations, and industry standards.
• Help users plan, implement, and track the performance of audit programs and tasks.
• Ensure business continuity management through incident management and risk mitigation.
• Deliver training and learning for compliance purposes, including certifications.
• Perform third-party, vendor, and supplier risk assessments and due diligence.
• Support multiple risk management methodologies, such as quantitative and qualitative.
• Gather and analyze environmental, social, and governance (ESG) data from various sources.

*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.  

1. AuditBoard

AuditBoard is one of the top GRC tools in the market; half of Fortune 500 companies use it. After exploring its features, I get the hype. 

What caught my attention—and the attention of many professionals I’ve spoken to—is how user-friendly and intuitive the interface is. Whether it’s auditors, stakeholders, or compliance teams, the platform seems designed with their needs in mind.

I like how well AuditBoard brings everything related to GRC together. It brings all your risk-related information together in one centralized location, links it directly to your audit plans, and integrates everything into a single, unified platform for management.

One of my favorite functionalities of the tool is the AuditBoard Business Intelligence or ABI dashboard. They go beyond being just visually appealing—they provide actionable, real-time insights into risk management, audit trails, and control testing. It’s these features that make navigating the complexities of GRC not just easier but also more efficient.

Another personal favorite of mine is AuditBoard AI, powered by generative AI. It helps with many document creation tasks, such as setting up vendor questionnaires of third-party software, generating new controls, risks, and issues based on our inputs, or summarising audit reports. 

Personally, I’m impressed with AuditBoard's integration capabilities. The platform integrates well with existing workflows, connecting with tools such as data warehouses, CRM or ERP systems, ticketing platforms, HR software, and even identity management tools. This interoperability reduces the need for manual data transfers, which, I believe, will allow teams to work more cohesively across departments.

That said, no tool is perfect, and AuditBoard is no exception. Its customization options are robust. However, some users I spoke with mentioned that setting up the ABI dashboards can be time-consuming, which is something to consider if you're pressed for time or resources.

Another point I came across was that the platform frequently rolls out new updates, which is great. But in practice, it can catch users off guard. There have been a few times when a new feature was automatically enabled without much notice, confusing users or causing some changes to their dashboards. I feel this could be better managed with clearer communication.

Overall, AuditBoard delivers on its promise to simplify and enhance GRC processes. From centralizing risk and audit management to offering real-time insights and integrations, it’s clear why it’s a go-to choice for many organizations.

What I dislike about AuditBoard:

• Setting up dashboards can be a bit time-consuming from my observation. While the customization options are great, it’s not the easiest process if you’re dealing with a lot of complexity.
• I noticed that updates can sometimes catch users off guard. When new features are enabled automatically, it can confuse users, which could be avoided with better communication.

What G2 users dislike about AuditBoard: 

"The permissions matrix is a little complex from an administrator standpoint - need to make sure you spend the time understanding teams versus roles and how to customize them accordingly. This goes back to making the most of your implementation phase.

Also, there is almost always a new feature being released or enhanced. At times (like when enhancements just show up rather than needing to be enabled), features can confuse users or cause them to use functions when not desired. This should be minimized by having an active administrator."

- AuditBoard Review, Kylie G, Senior Auditor and Data Analyst. 

2. Workiva

For me, Workiva truly shines when it comes to financial reporting and compliance. As someone who’s spent time exploring tools that simplify compliance and risk management, there are several reasons why I find Workiva invaluable.

Like in AuditBoard, I like that I can pull in data from my general ledger software, ESG reporting tools, HR systems and other tools directly into the system with a button push. 

But, the most notable functionality to me is its ability to link data across multiple reports and documents. When working on something as critical as Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) or U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, even the smallest error in one section can create inconsistencies elsewhere.

Workiva takes that stress away by automatically updating linked data in real time. So, if I update the number in one file and push to 100 other links with a button click, everything gets updated automatically. This level of accuracy is a lifesaver when even minor oversights can lead to penalties or failed audits.

Collaboration is another reason I think Workiva is a must-have for GRC professionals. From what I have seen, reporting and audit preparation often involve multiple teams—finance, legal, IT, and risk management—and getting everyone on the same page can be a nightmare.

With Workiva, everyone can work on the same document simultaneously without worrying about version control. I found this incredibly transparent and saves a lot of time.

But there are some drawbacks I saw. One thing I’ve noted is that Workiva can slow down occasionally, especially when you have multiple tabs open or when there’s a lot of data involved. If you open just one extra tab, there’s a chance the system might freeze, which can be irritating during critical moments.

Another issue I’ve observed is some limitations in editing and formatting the documents, be it Word, presentation, or Excel files, using Workiva tools. For instance, documents imported from Word into Workiva can have some formatting issues, such as misaligned margins and unexpected page breaks. This can make document editing more time-consuming than it should be.

That said, Workiva is still one of the best GRC software for bringing together all your financial and  ESG  reporting into one place. If you’re looking for a solution to streamline your financial reporting and compliance processes and reduce the stress of managing large-scale reporting, I’d definitely recommend giving Workiva a try.

What I dislike about Workiva:

• I’ve observed that the system can slow down, especially when you have multiple tabs open or when working with large amounts of data. Sometimes, it even freezes, which can be annoying during tight deadlines.
• Another thing that bothers me is the editing and formatting limitations, which often require extra time to adjust documents properly. While not a major issue, it can be annoying and time-consuming

What G2 users dislike about Workiva:

"I feel like sometimes my brain goes faster than how long it takes to switch between a Workiva document and a Workiva spreadsheet. Sometimes, when I copy a source link and paste it into the Workiva document, it takes a while, and when I have numerous things to copy, it just ends up messing with my speed." 

- Workiva Review,  Daisy Y, Small Business. 

3. Scrut Automation

Scrut Automation is one of those platforms that immediately stands out for its ability to simplify compliance without making the process feel like a never-ending checklist to me.

I’ve explored a lot of GRC tools, and what makes Scrut different is how well it balances automation with usability. Unlike some enterprise-heavy platforms that require months of onboarding, But from what I see, Scrut makes policy management, risk tracking, and compliance audits feel less like a burden and more like a structured, manageable process.

One of the first things I realized is how effective Scrut is at helping organizations maintain multiple compliance frameworks. Whether it’s ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOC 2, or cyber risk management, Scrut centralizes everything in one place, making it easier to navigate these overlapping requirements. Scrut’s automation features—especially for evidence collection and audit workflows—improves these processes significantly.

That said, Scrut has some drawbacks, too. While Scrut’s automation features are a huge plus, I did notice that the initial setup can be time-consuming. This isn’t entirely surprising—most GRC platforms mentioned here require some configuration—but it’s something to consider if you’re looking for a plug-and-play solution.

Additionally, the Scrut agent software, which automates evidence collection, could use some improvements, as some users have noted that it doesn’t always perform as expected.

Regardless of the drawbacks, if you’re in cybersecurity, health tech, fintech, or any industry where compliance is a moving target, I'd suggest you give Scrut a look. It’s especially useful for mid-sized companies that need a scalable, audit-friendly platform to manage policies, risks, and security frameworks in one place.

What I dislike about Scrut Automation:

• From what I observed, once everything is in place, Scrut runs smoothly, but getting there takes more time and effort. So, be prepared to spend time setting up controls, mapping frameworks, and configuring workflows before it really starts paying off.
• I've realized that while the Scrut agent is useful for scanning and monitoring security posture in endpoint devices, it could be improved for better performance. There are occasional sync issues

What G2 users dislike about Scrut Automation: 

"While Scrut offers customizable controls, some organizations with highly complex requirements might find the pre-built template limiting. customization beyond a certain level requires manual intervention or workarounds. Scrut automation is very effective, but the one thing is that it provides many features, so for new users, it is overwhelming without sufficient training." 

- Scrut Automation Review, Gautam M, DevOps Engineer.

4. IBM OpenPages

IBM is one of the most recognized names in the tech world, and, in my opinion, IBM OpenPages reflects the company’s expertise in creating solutions for complex business challenges.

What sets it apart for me is how scalable and adaptable it is. OpenPages isn’t just built for small teams—it scales to thousands of users, which makes it perfect for enterprises with both front-office and back-office users managing risks across different domains. 

I love its modular nature, which allows me to deploy domain-targeted modules for regulatory compliance, IT risks, or operational risks.

Another notable highlight for me is its AI-driven capabilities. From automating workflows with simple drag-and-drop functionality to leveraging predictive analytics through IBM Cognos, it feels like the platform is constantly working to reduce the workload of my audit and compliance team. One use case that stood out to me was the integration with AI for incident reporting. It’s not just about flagging risks—it uses relevant classifications to improve the accuracy and efficiency of reporting,

The platform’s flexibility is another big win, in my view. Whether you want to deploy it behind your firewall or on any cloud, it adapts to your infrastructure needs. I’ve seen tools that force you to fit their deployment model, but OpenPages gives you complete freedom, which is a huge plus for organizations with strict IT or data governance policies.

I also have to mention how well it integrates with third-party systems. With IBM App Connect and REST APIs, I can connect OpenPages to other critical tools in my tech stack without any hassle.

Of course, OpenPages isn't perfect. I’d say the onboarding process for such a powerful tool can feel a bit overwhelming at first, especially for teams without prior experience with similar tools. The extensive customization options are great, but they can require significant time and resources during implementation. 

Another common concern I observed among users is the high cost of IBM OpenPages. Some feel that it is more expensive than competing GRC solutions, making adoption more challenging for teams with limited budgets.

Nonetheless, if you’re in a compliance-heavy industry like banking, healthcare, or finance, IBM OpenPages is worth considering.

What I dislike about IBM OpenPages:

• While the platform is incredibly powerful, the onboarding process can feel a bit daunting. Getting the customization right often takes more time and effort than I’d like, especially for teams new to this type of tool.
• One thing I’ve heard is that IBM OpenPages comes with a hefty price tag, which can be a hurdle for teams working within tight budgets.   

What G2 users dislike about IBM OpenPages: 

"The cost is high compared to other GRC tools, and there are some hurdles in user adoption."
- IBM OpenPages Review, Vishal D, Trainer. 

5. Hyperproof

Hyperproof has quickly become one of my favorite GRC tools, mainly because of its simplicity and the way it handles a wide range of risk and compliance processes.

From what I've seen, the most striking characteristic is its interface. Hyperproof keeps things simple without sacrificing functionality, a rare combination in GRC tools. Its clean design and intuitive navigation make it accessible even to users who aren’t deeply familiar with GRC processes. 

Another core strength of Hyperproof, from my observation, is the 150+ pre-built templates of frameworks for different compliance regulations, such as NIST, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOX. If I don't want to use these templates, I can create a custom one suitable for my needs. 

I absolutely love how Hyperproof automates evidence gathering. It simplifies this often tedious process by allowing us to set controls based on different InfoSec frameworks, assign owners for those, then link evidence directly to controls and automatically pull updates when needed. It eliminates the need to chase down documentation manually, which is especially useful during high-pressure audits. Now, the best part? Hyperproof de-duplicates any overlapping controls between different frameworks. 

This level of automation is not just a time-saver—it ensures consistency and reduces the risk of human error.

I like its vendor management module, too. It not only centralizes all vendor data but also makes it easy to monitor and manage risks that could potentially impact the organization. For instance, during audits, pulling up relevant data for vendors is as simple as a few clicks, which reduces the time spent preparing and ensures nothing is missed.

However, a challenge I  see with the tool, at times, is the terminology. If you’ve used other GRC tools, you’ll notice that Hyperproof’s terminology can be a little different, which creates a bit of a learning curve. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it’s something that takes some getting used to.

Also, while Hyperproof covers the basics well, there are certain functionalities that users expect that aren’t there yet. For instance, reporting customization is somewhat limited, while GRC users would like more control over templates and data visualization.

While the tool is easy to use,  I feel the level of effort to deploy Hyperproof into production and set up integrations to automate some compliance functions can be quite extensive, depending on your compliance program. 

Even with these limitations, Hyperloop is best for companies looking to automate the GRC workflows.

What I dislike about Hyperproof:

• From my observation, the reporting features leave much to be desired. While Hyperproof provides basic reporting capabilities, the customization options are limited.
• While the platform is easy to use, I feel getting Hyperproof into production takes effort. The deployment process required significant time and resources, which could be a challenge for smaller teams.

What G2 users dislike about Hyperproof: 

"The dashboard lacks customization options, and the internal reporting feature falls short of expectations, as it is also non-customizable. Hyperproof’s suggested solution is to use Snowflake integration to extract data and generate reports. Additionally, a customizable, template-based questionnaire for assessments is not available." 

- Hyperproof Review, Satish S, Senior Cloud Compliance Lead. 

6. Fusion Framework System 

Fusion Framework System takes a structured, no-nonsense approach to risk and resilience management, and that’s exactly why it works so well, in my view. Unlike some GRC tools that try to do everything but end up feeling bloated, Fusion focuses on what matters: keeping risks visible, automating critical processes, and ensuring teams can respond effectively when things go wrong.

One thing I immediately noticed is how well the platform brings everything under one roof. Whether it’s business continuity planning, incident response, or third-party risk management, Fusion consolidates all these moving parts into a single, connected framework.

Where Fusion excels is in risk response automation—it doesn’t just track risks; it connects risk assessments to business continuity and incident response plans from what I saw. This makes it particularly valuable for organizations focused on resilience rather than just compliance.

I also found its customizable dashboards incredibly useful and convenient. Being able to tailor them to show exactly what I need makes a huge difference in how we track risks and compliance tasks. Real-time reporting is another major plus. 

That said, I’ve noticed occasional slowness when handling large datasets, or running complex risk reports or when multiple people login simultaneously. While this isn’t a dealbreaker, it can be frustrating when trying to pull time-sensitive information for an audit.

Also, getting Fusion up and running takes time. While I appreciate how flexible it is, that flexibility comes with a tradeoff—you really have to configure it properly to get the most out of it. If your team doesn’t have the resources to dedicate to setup and fine-tuning, the initial learning curve can feel overwhelming. It’s powerful, no doubt, but it demands commitment.

So, it's clear to me that if you’re willing to invest the time in setup, Fusion can be a highly effective risk and resilience management too

What I dislike about Fusion Framework System:

• The system slows down at times, especially when several people are using it at once. When I’m pulling reports or making updates, these delays can be frustrating and disrupt my workflow.
• While Fusion is a powerful platform, I found that getting fully comfortable with it takes time since its flexibility also means there’s a lot to configure upfront.

What G2 users dislike about Fusion Framework System: 

"Getting started may seem to be a big load because there is so much one could do with it. Some more transparent steps or additional help at the very beginning would be helpful for sure. And sometimes, it becomes a bit slow when we are working with larger volumes of data. This becomes kind of irritating. It is necessary to speed up this process. This would be really helpful." 

- Fusion Framework System Review, Harold P, Risk Management Specialist. 

7. LogicGate Risk Cloud

Drawing from my experience, LogicGate Risk Cloud is an excellent addition to any team's GRC toolkit if you want a high degree of customization. 

I found LogicGate to be highly flexible and customizable, unlike some GRC tools that feel rigid. From building tailored workflows to configuring home screens to display the information that matters most to us, the flexibility of the platform is unmatched. What's more? If I am unsure where to start, there are pre-built templates and applications that give s a solid foundation to work from, making it easier to get up and running.

Another aspect I deeply value is the sheer range of solutions available with LogicGate. And I’m not just talking about the usual suspects like cyber risk management, ESG, audits, regulatory compliance, or third-party risk management. What really stood out to me was the dedicated solution for AI governance. I don’t recall seeing this offered on other platforms.

Sure, I could probably customize other tools to address AI governance, but having a pre-built, dedicated solution felt unique to LogicGate.

Also, I must mention that their support team and implementation team is phenomenal. They’re always available to answer questions, guide you through new features, or assist with more complex configurations. Whether it’s a quick tip or walking you through a tricky process, the team’s responsiveness and expertise really stand out. For a tool as powerful as Risk Cloud, having this level of support makes a huge difference.

That said, there are some areas where LogicGate could improve. One limitation I’ve come across is related to feature flexibility—while the platform offers customization, some users feel it doesn’t go as deep as they’d like. For example, reporting capabilities could use more visual enhancements, like better colors and data visualization options. Another limitation I heard is related to the inability to create child risks or controls, which would be helpful for more granular risk tracking. 

Additionally, the platform can feel a little overwhelming at first, as per my assessment.  Even after completing the power user training, it might take some time to fully understand the system’s capabilities, especially if you’re new. But once you get the hang of it, the system proves to be incredibly valuable. It’s a tool that grows with you as you learn how to maximize its potential.

Overall, LogicGate is a great choice if you’re looking for a highly flexible GRC tool capable of addressing a wide variety of compliance needs.

What I dislike about LogicGate Cloud Risk:

• From my observations, the platform can feel overwhelming at first, even after completing the power user training to fully grasp its capabilities and feel comfortable navigating it.
• While the system offers great flexibility, I’ve noticed some limitations when it comes to customizations of reporters or tracking granular relationships, like child risks or controls. Adding deeper functionality in this area would make it even more valuable.

What G2 users dislike about LogicGate Cloud Risk: 

"It can seem a little daunting at first, even after completing the power user training, especially if you are someone new to the company that is already using Risk Cloud."

- LogicGate Cloud Risk Review, David D.

Before wrapping up, I wanted to highlight a few other GRC platforms that have stood out to me. While the tools I’ve reviewed are my top picks, there are several others worth exploring based on the G2 grid report, my own experience, and conversations I’ve had with professionals in the GRC space. Here they are: 

• Diligent One Platform (formerly HighBond) is ideal for organizations that need a comprehensive solution for audit, risk, and compliance with robust reporting capabilities.
• ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management is best for enterprises that want to easilu integrate risk management into IT workflows and operations.
• OnSpring is great for teams that value flexibility and a no-code platform to customize their GRC processes without relying on developers.
• SAI360 is perfect for organizations that require strong ESG capabilities alongside traditional risk and compliance management.
• Vanta is best for startups and SMBs looking to streamline SOC 2 compliance with automated evidence collection and monitoring.
• Drata is the go-to choice for companies aiming to achieve and maintain compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA quickly and efficiently.

These platforms each offer something unique and depending on your organization’s needs, and they’re all worth a closer look.

Frequently asked questions (FAQ) on GRC software

1. Who uses governance, risk and compliance software?

GRC software is used by a wide range of professionals, including compliance officers, risk managers, internal auditors, IT teams, legal teams, and executive leadership. It’s particularly valuable in industries with stringent regulatory requirements, such as banking, healthcare, manufacturing, and technology.

2. Which industries need GRC software?

GRC software is essential for industries that operate under strict regulatory and compliance requirements. These include:

• Financial services: To comply with regulations like SOX, GDPR, and PCI DSS while managing operational and credit risks.
• Healthcare: For HIPAA compliance, data security, and risk management in patient care and operations.
• Technology and SaaS: To ensure SOC 2, ISO 27001, and data privacy compliance.
• Manufacturing: For supply chain risk management and compliance with industry standards like ISO and OSHA.
• Energy and utilities: To meet environmental, health, and safety (EHS) regulations and manage risks in operations.
• Retail and e-commerce: For PCI DSS compliance, data protection, and third-party vendor risk management.

3. What are the key features to look for in GRC compliance software?

When choosing GRC software, look for features like:

• Risk management and assessment tools.
• Compliance tracking and reporting.
• Workflow automation for audits and evidence collection.
• Integration with third-party tools (e.g., ERP, CRM, SIEM).
• Customizable dashboards and real-time analytics.
• Support for multiple compliance frameworks like ISO, SOC 2, HIPAA, and GDPR.

3. How much does GRC software cost?

The cost of GRC software varies depending on the vendor, features, and scale of deployment and typically ranges from $15,000 to over $50,000.  Pricing models can include subscription fees, per-user licensing, or usage-based costs. The GRC software typically come with training for users and add-on features at extra cost.

4. Can GRC software support multiple compliance standards?

Yes, many GRC tools are designed to handle multiple frameworks, including ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. These platforms allow businesses to map controls across different standards, reducing duplication of effort and streamlining compliance management.

5. How does GRC software help businesses stay compliant?

GRC tools simplify compliance by automating manual tasks like control monitoring, evidence collection, and reporting. Features like automated reminders and real-time tracking ensure deadlines are met and audits are easier to manage. GRC platforms also keep businesses updated on regulatory changes and reduce the risk of human error.

6. What are the best GRC software solutions in 2025?

Some of the top GRC software s in 2025 include:

• AuditBoard: Best for automating audits and SOX compliance.
• Workiva: Ideal for financial reporting and integrated compliance.
• IBM OpenPages: Best for scalable, AI-driven GRC solutions.
• Hyperproof: Excels in evidence automation and multi-framework compliance.
• LogicGate Risk Cloud: Highly customizable for unique risk management workflows.

Other noteworthy platforms include Diligent One Platform, ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management, Vanta, and Drata.

Compliance conquered

As someone who has explored the ins and outs of these GRC platforms, I’ve come to realize that the right GRC tool go beyond just “helping” organizations stay compliant. They give teams a way to work smarter, faster, and with far more confidence.

From my own team's experience, it’s clear that these platforms solve pain points that have traditionally plagued compliance and risk management teams, whether it’s disorganized workflows, siloed data, or the sheer complexity of audits.

But what really stands out to me is how they shift the focus from reactive firefighting to proactive risk management. They give teams the confidence to stay ahead, not just keep up. If you’ve ever spent hours chasing evidence or untangling audit prep, you’ll know exactly what I mean. So, why wait for the next audit to catch you off guard? 

Here’s your next step: take charge. Think about your team’s biggest challenges—whether it’s chasing evidence, managing risks, or untangling audits—and identify what’s holding you back. Then, look for a GRC platform that aligns with your needs and empowers your team to work smarter and try their demos. our team—and your future self—will thank you when you find the right tool. 

Need help to keep up with changing government regulations? Explore the best regulatory change management software to tackle them head on.