I Evaluated 6 Best Audit Management Software (2025 Edition)

I’m the kind of person who loves a well-organized system. 

If I’m packing for a trip, you won’t catch me throwing things into a suitcase last minute. Nope. I’ve got a checklist, packing cubes, and a method for making sure everything fits perfectly. Because when things are in order, everything runs smoother.

And honestly, that same principle applies to audit management. When you have the right tools in place, tracking compliance and staying organized becomes a whole lot easier. 

I know how frustrating it can be to juggle spreadsheets, emails, and outdated systems, only to still feel like you’re drowning in audit chaos. That’s why I set out to find the best audit management software solutions that balance powerful features, ease of use, and automation to take the headache out of audits.

After reviewing thousands of G2 user reviews and comparing top tools, I’ve narrowed it down to six audit management platforms that truly stand out. Whether you're a compliance officer, an internal auditor, or a business leader looking for a smarter way to manage risk, this list is packed with options worth considering.

Let’s dive in and find the right tool to keep your audits running smoothly.

6 best audit management software I’d recommend

Audits are a crucial part of compliance and enterpise risk management, but without the right tools, they can quickly become overwhelming. Tracking regulatory requirements, managing audit workflows, and ensuring documentation are in order isn’t as simple as just following a checklist I use for packing. Compliance professionals need software that can automate the tedious parts and help them focus on ensuring accuracy and efficiency.

Some tools streamline reporting; others offer automated risk assessments, real-time tracking, or seamless collaboration features. With the right solution, it’s possible to spend less time buried in spreadsheets and more time driving meaningful improvements.

After analyzing thousands of G2 reviews and comparing the top-rated tools, I’ve selected six audit management platforms that truly stand out.

What makes the best audit management software worth it: My perspective

With so many audit and risk management software in the market, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by features, dashboards, and promises of "total compliance." But what makes audit management software truly worth it isn’t just the feature list; it’s how well it supports your actual workflow.

The best tools don’t just check boxes. They reduce chaos, bring structure to complex processes, and help you stay ahead of compliance requirements without burning out your team. I think it all comes down to usability, automation tools, reporting clarity, and how seamlessly it fits into your existing systems.

Here’s what I looked for when deciding whether an audit management platform is worth the time, money, and long-term commitment.

• Workflow automation: One of the first things I looked for was how well the software handles automation. Manually managing audit steps is time-consuming and easy to mess up. Compliance professionals want a tool that can automate recurring tasks such as assigning audit steps, sending reminders, or escalating overdue items. Users mention that if the platform lets them customize workflows based on different audit types or departments, that’s a huge plus.
• Document and evidence management: During an audit, documents fly in from everywhere, including emails, shared drives, and spreadsheets. A centralized place to store everything: audit plans, checklists, evidence, and reports is non-negotiable. Bonus points if the software can assist in tagging files, adding notes, and tracking versions. A good document management system helps avoid the chaos of digging through folders or accidentally using outdated files.
• Risk assessment and scoring: Users are keen to know if a platform supports risk assessments, especially if it allows for customizable scoring systems. Being able to evaluate risks, assign ratings, and prioritize issues makes it easier to focus on what actually matters. Some tools even offer pre-built frameworks or heat maps, which makes risk visibility much more intuitive.
• Audit planning and scheduling: Planning audits without proper scheduling tools can get messy, and G2 users often echo this. I looked at how each platform helps users map out the audit lifecycle, from assigning tasks to setting deadlines and visualizing timelines. Many reviewers point out how useful scheduling tools are when they are intuitive and help them stay organized throughout the process.
• Reporting: Reporting is one of the most important parts of an audit tool. Users don’t want basic PDFs. They want visual dashboards and customizable reports that clearly show audit progress, outstanding issues, and risk areas. Real-time updates are often mentioned as a major plus, especially by teams juggling multiple audits simultaneously.
• Issue tracking: A solid issue tracking system is a must. I focused on software with the ability to log findings, assign corrective actions, and track progress until resolution. It's helpful when there’s a workflow built in for following up on remediation steps. This not only ensures accountability but also properly closes the loop on each audit.

*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.   

1. AuditBoard

AuditBoard is a tool users seem genuinely impressed by. It shows up often in G2 reviews from teams looking to simplify audit management without sacrificing control. According to reviewers, the interface is clean, intuitive, and easy to pick up. Workflow tracking also gets a lot of love. Users say it helps them assign tasks, keep deadlines in check, and avoid constant email back-and-forth. Based on feedback, one of the biggest strengths is how well it centralizes collaboration and documentation, especially when managing multiple audits with different stakeholders involved.

I consistently noticed in G2 reviews how much users appreciated AuditBoard’s compliance management and reporting tools. Whether they were prepping for a regulatory review or pulling historical data, many users said the reporting experience was quick and straightforward. What impressed me most from user feedback was the flexibility around customization. Several teams shared that they could tailor fields and workflows to match how they work instead of adapting to rigid software constraints.

But the platform isn’t without its quirks, and user feedback echoes that. The AuditBoard Sync feature gets glitches like changes not saving correctly or updates being overwritten. That’s not ideal when you’re working under pressure.

The reviews on ABI dashboards are mixed. While the visuals look great once they’re live, my research suggests that setup can be slow, and filters don’t always save between sessions.

Another theme I saw was around the platform’s AI capabilities. While it’s nice that AuditBoard incorporates intelligent features, several reviewers said the AI-generated results often need heavy edits. Most of them end up reworking the content manually anyway.

I also encountered complaints about performance. Load times and document updates can be hit or miss, and some users experience lag. Finally, AuditBoard is definitely positioned as a premium tool, and that came through in a number of reviews. If your team isn’t using most of the features, the cost can be tough to justify.

What I dislike about AuditBoard:

• One common complaint I saw in G2 reviews is that AuditBoard doesn’t always save properly, which makes collaborating with teammates inconvenient when changes don’t sync.
• Some users also pointed out that certain valuable features, like AI enhancements, are only available at the highest tiers, which tends to price out small to midsize customers. Even for those with access, a few reviewers felt the AI functionality still has room for improvement. 

What G2 users dislike about AuditBoard:

"The level of administrating the system: adding fields, data, populating steps, all the required fields to be completed to enable dashboards and archiving. It's also tedious to sign off on steps, add documents, and populate issues and Management Action Plans. Sync and editing documents online sometimes get lost. Finally, when comparing our efficiency to produce work before we had AuditBoard to after we got the tool, I think we were faster and more efficient to produce high quality audits before we started using AB."

- AuditBoard Review, verified user. 

2. Workiva

If you’re dealing with complex reporting, audits, or compliance tasks across teams, Workiva handles everything well.

The first thing that stood out to me? Ease of use. Several G2 users say that once you get past the initial setup, the interface is super clean and intuitive. The platform makes it super simple to create and update documents, link data, and collaborate with teammates in real time. It sounds like editing the same doc at the same time where nothing gets overwritten.

Workiva’s dynamic linking feature gets a ton of love in G2 reviews. Users highlight how easy it is to connect data across documents; you can change a number in one place, and it updates everywhere automatically. It saves teams from the hassle of manual updates and the stress of missing something important.

Version control is another standout feature that came up often in G2 reviews. Users mentioned being able to pull previous document versions down to the exact minute. I can imagine this being helpful when someone asks, “Wait, what was in the doc last Tuesday?” The platform’s collaboration capabilities also received a lot of positive feedback. Whether it’s SEC filings, audit support documentation, or control testing, teams say they’re able to work simultaneously without getting in each other’s way.

Of course, it’s not without trade-offs. A recurring review theme is pricing. Workiva isn’t the most budget-friendly option, and the cost can be tough to justify for smaller teams or companies that don’t need every advanced feature.

Several users also pointed out that the platform can feel a bit too heavy for quick or simple tasks. If the goal is just to build a basic document or make a fast update, the overall complexity might slow things down more than help.

Customization drew mixed reactions. While there is some flexibility, a few reviewers said they ran into limitations and had to work within Workiva's structure rather than tailoring everything precisely to their process.

And then there’s the learning curve. It’s not overwhelming, but users mention it. Familiarizing yourself with all the features, especially audit workflows and reporting, takes some time.

That said, many G2 users describe Workiva as a powerhouse for teams that need robust reporting, data integration, and real-time collaboration. Once everything’s in place, it seems to make complex projects much more manageable.

What I dislike about Workiva:

• I came across quite a few reviews calling out the pricing. It’s not the most accessible option, especially if you’re on a smaller team or not tapping into every advanced feature. 
• Performance came up, too. Some users mentioned that the platform lags during busy times or when uploading large files. And if you're working with charts or visuals, the process doesn’t always feel as smooth as expected. 

What G2 users dislike about Workiva:

"Workiva can be a bit harder to use when formatting with images or insertion of objects, such as graphs. In general, customization options can feel limited at times."

- Workiva Review, Bo G. 

3. Vanta

Let me just start by saying. Compliance isn’t fun. But based on G2 reviews, Vanta makes the process way less painful.

The first thing I noticed repeatedly mentioned in reviews was how simple and intuitive the platform felt. There's no guessing where things were or how to get started. The interface is clean, clear, and doesn’t make you feel like you're drowning in tech jargon. However, users noted that the initial setup took some time. It doesn't seem overly complex, but there are a lot of moving parts to get configured, especially if your environment has custom stuff going on.

What caught my attention in the reviews was how much automation Vanta brings to the table. It takes over a lot of the repetitive stuff, pulling evidence, checking systems, and tracking tasks. Instead of doing it all manually, users get a notification when something needs their input. It’s like having a tireless assistant dedicated to compliance.

People also seemed genuinely happy about the integrations. Everything syncs up smoothly, making a big difference when working with several tools across your company.

And it’s not just surface-level stuff. Vanta goes deep with security and compliance features. From risk assessments to real-time monitoring, it gives users a full view of how they’re doing. Reviewers noted getting alerts when something’s off, which means it can be fixed before becoming a bigger issue.

A few reviewers mentioned delays with customer support. It's not a huge issue, but it stood out during crunch time.

Pricing came up a lot, too. Vanta clearly offers value, but for smaller teams or startups, the cost might give you pause. It’s not exactly budget-friendly, especially if you’re just getting started.

A few features also felt less intuitive. Some users said they had to spend time reading through documentation or asking for help before everything clicked.

Even with those bumps, the overall feedback was solid. Once everything's set up, Vanta comes across as efficient, user-friendly, and seriously capable.

What I dislike about Vanta:

• When I dug into the reviews, a common theme was the learning curve. It’s not impossible to figure out, but several users felt a bit lost at the beginning until things started to click.
• Another topic was customization. Some people mentioned that certain reports and features felt a little rigid and that there was not always as much flexibility as they’d like.

What G2 users dislike about Vanta:

"Vanta's pricing can be a little high for smaller companies and the advanced features seems to be a learning curve. While it integrates with many tools, gaps exists for niche platforms and the alert system can be sometimes overwhelm with minor or false-positive notifications."

- Vanta Review, Kavya K. 

4. Thoropass

When I first started digging into Thoropass through G2 reviews, it was clear the platform packs a ton of functionality. There’s a lot to take in initially, but once users get familiar with the flow, many say it becomes one of the most valuable tools in their compliance process.

What people appreciated most was the structure. All the compliance docs are housed in one place, task assignments are simple, and progress tracking is built in. It benefits teams managing multiple frameworks like SOC 2, HIPAA, or ISO.

One of the big things I kept seeing in G2 reviews was how much users value the automation in Thoropass. It handles repetitive work, such as monitoring controls, gathering evidence, and sending reminders. Several people mentioned how much time this saves week to week, and for many, that alone made the platform feel worthwhile.

The support experience came up often, too. According to reviewers, the team is responsive and very helpful. Whether it’s about integrations or getting audit-ready, users felt they were getting guidance from a partner, not just generic responses.

Thoropass also fits nicely into existing workflows. The integrations seem to work smoothly, pulling in relevant data and reducing manual tracking.

But there are a few rough edges. Users definitely notice the learning curve. With so many features packed in, the platform can feel a bit overwhelming at the start. A few reviewers also wished the interface was more intuitive; some parts take extra clicks, and setup isn’t exactly effortless.

There were also little bits of feedback about smaller features. Nothing major, but a few tweaks or additions could make everyday use even smoother.

What I dislike about Thoropass:

• I understand audits are never exactly fast, but a few G2 reviewers mentioned that the process in Thoropass sometimes felt more drawn out than expected. 
• Like many platforms, users also pointed out the occasional hiccup, such as progress banners not updating or fields not saving properly. It's nothing deal-breaking, but enough to cause some minor friction along the way.

What G2 users dislike about Thoropass:

"Some of the uploading of information gets a bit tedious, but that's how the audit process works. If your system is a bit different, takes a lot of explaining." 

- Thoropass Review, David L R. 

5. Scrut Automation

All right, let me walk you through what stood out to me about Scrut Automation, especially for teams working with SOC 2 or ISO 27001 frameworks. I evaluated a bunch of tools in this space, but G2 feedback suggests that Scrut makes the process feel doable, even for someone who’s not knee-deep in security 24/7.

The automation, in particular, gets a lot of thumbs up. Users say Scrut connects seamlessly with tools like AWS, Google Workspace, and Jira to collect evidence automatically. No need to manually chase down screenshots or logs. It also helps surface what’s missing, sends out reminders, and ties everything together through a built-in task management system that reviewers say keeps the whole process on track.

I noticed that the reviewers were big on the dashboard design. It was often described as clear, comprehensive, and ideal for monitoring audit progress. The ability to share access with auditors was another plus. And while the policy templates weren’t exactly plug-and-play, they gave teams a functional baseline to build from, which helped speed things up.

One thing that kept coming up in reviews? The support. Multiple users talked about having a dedicated project manager who was actually hands-on, jumping on calls, answering the smallest questions without hesitation, and guiding them through roadblocks without the usual back-and-forth.

Now, Scrut isn’t perfect. User sentiment showed that the UI could use a facelift, especially compared to shinier platforms out there. And while the integrations are solid, I read enough reviews that said that they wish there were more of them or at least more depth in the ones that exist. There were also mentions of a couple of small bugs early on, though nothing critical.

All in all, if you’re looking to get audit-ready without losing your sanity, Scrut makes it feel less like a nightmare and more like a checklist you can actually finish.

What I dislike about Scrut Automation:

• The UI could be better. G2 reviewers note that it works, but it’s not the smoothest or most modern-looking platform they've used.
• Another downside I picked up on was that quite a few users spent a considerable amount of time customizing the platform to meet their requirements. It felt slightly overwhelming at first. 

What G2 users dislike about Scrut Automation:

"While Scrut Automation is a powerful tool, the initial setup can be a bit overwhelming, especially for teams new to compliance management software. However, their customer support team is very responsive and helpful, which made the onboarding process smoother." 

- Scrut Automation Review, Karan A. 

6. SafetyCulture

If you’re constantly juggling safety checks, inspections, audits, and compliance documentation, then SafetyCulture is going to feel like a breath of fresh air.

What came through in G2 reviews was how quickly people got up and running with SafetyCulture. Multiple users mentioned how easy it was to create checklists and assign tasks without needing to dive deep into training. That kind of simplicity is a huge win when you're managing audits across different job sites.

According to users, real-time updates and customization options also seem to have made a noticeable impact on safety compliance. The mobile app got plenty of shoutouts, too. It works smoothly on the go and doesn’t fall apart when you’re offline, which is a lifesaver in low-coverage areas.

Another big plus? Photo and video evidence collection. You can snap photos, annotate them, and attach them right to your reports. This makes tracking issues way more visual and actionable. Plus, all of that syncs back to your dashboard, so managers can get real-time insights — no waiting around for someone to email a report. How amazing is that!

The automation features in SafetyCulture get a lot of positive attention in reviews. Setting up triggers based on checklist responses might seem like a small detail, but users say it cuts down manual follow-up time.

Still, there are a few areas where things could be better. Some reviewers noted that the AI-generated insights aren’t always accurate. It’s not unusable, but making sense of it all can take some learning.

Search functionality in the analytics section is another area for improvement. When teams are working with hundreds of reports or templates, not being able to filter and find what they need can be frustrating. There were also a few mentions of the desktop web version needing refinement. It works, but the user experience could be smoother.

What I dislike about SafetyCulture:

• According to user feedback, search in analytics could be better. When looking for a specific report or trend, it takes longer than it should to find what's needed.
• I also noticed people saying that setting up the inspection templates takes some time at first, but once done, it becomes much easier. 

What G2 users dislike about SafetyCulture:

"Its very easy to accidentally create duplicate reports and when you have multiple people editing these reports at once it can make extra work when you are first learning to navigate it but this is easily avoided once you get used to the software. The only way to dispose of these duplicates is to archive the unwanted report and this has to be done by the creator but again not a big deal and easily avoided once familiarized with the software."

- SafetyCulture Review, Daniel D. 

Frequently asked questions about the best audit management software

Have more questions? Find more answers below.

Q. How do I choose the best audit management software for my needs?

It really comes down to your specific goals. I recommend looking at key features like workflow automation, risk assessment tools, document management, and reporting dashboards. Also, consider ease of use, pricing, customer support, and whether it integrates with the tools you already use.

Q. Can small businesses use audit management software, or is it only for enterprises?

Absolutely. Many platforms are designed to scale. Some offer affordable plans for small businesses with fewer users or audits per year. You don’t need to be a massive organization to benefit from better audit processes.

Q. What kind of audits can this software handle?

Most tools are flexible enough to handle a variety of audits, including internal audits, financial audits, IT audits, compliance audits, and operational reviews. Some even offer templates or modules tailored to specific industries or regulations.

Q. Does audit software help with compliance requirements like SOX, ISO, or GDPR?

Q. Can audit software integrate with my existing systems?

Most modern platforms offer integrations with tools like Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, ERP systems, or document storage platforms. I always recommend checking the integrations list to make sure it fits seamlessly into your current workflow.

Q. Is audit management software secure?

Security is a big deal. Especially when you’re dealing with sensitive compliance data. The best tools offer features like role-based access, encryption, audit trails, and regular security updates. If you're in a regulated industry, this should be non-negotiable.

Ready to say goodbye to spreadsheet stress?

These audit management platforms have your back. Audit challenges aren’t going away. With the right software, they don’t have to slow you down. The tools I’ve covered here are built to make audits more manageable, accurate, and less time-consuming so you can focus on what matters most: keeping your business secure and compliant.

Choose the one that fits your team’s needs and start building a more efficient, transparent, and proactive audit process. The future of compliance is smarter, faster, and powered by the right technology.

Managing multiple audits or teams? See which project management tools my colleague recommends for high-compliance environments.