June 27, 2025
by Holly Landis / June 27, 2025
When everything’s generated, how do you spot the genuine?
From blog posts and research summaries to job applications and product reviews, machine-generated text is showing up everywhere. In fact, recent data suggests that 74% of new web content is generated by AI.
This tidal wave of synthetic content has made it harder than ever to know who or what is behind the words we read. That’s where AI content detectors come in. These tools are designed to analyze text and estimate whether it was created by a human or an AI model like GPT-4.
But how do AI detectors work, and how accurate are they? And is it still possible for AI-generated content to bypass them completely? For writers, academics, and even business professionals, knowing what AI detection is is the first step.
AI detection is the process of identifying content, behavior, or patterns generated or influenced by artificial intelligence. It is commonly used to detect AI-written text, manipulated media, or automated bot activity. Detection methods rely on linguistic cues, metadata, and machine learning classifiers.
This guide unpacks the mechanics behind AI detection, explains what the scores really mean, and helps you use these tools more clearly and confidently.
All AI detectors are trained based on language models used by the tools they aim to detect content from. Essentially, the detector looks for clues to determine whether a human could have authored the content.
The detectors look for two specific aspects: perplexity and burstiness. The lower these two variables are, the more likely it is that the text was generated by AI. Let’s dive into the details and examples.
This is a measure of how likely the text is to confuse the average reader—in other words, how predictable or unpredictable the text is. Human-generated content typically tends to be more complex, with creative language choices and occasional typos. In contrast, an AI writing generator aims for low perplexity and writes in the least complicated manner.
Let's look at an example for the sentence "the cat jumped onto the table..."
Sentence continuation | Perplexity |
And started purring | Low (common, predictable continuation) |
Knocking over a glass of water that spilled onto the floor | Medium (less predictable but logical continuation) |
And the table turned into a flying carpet, whisking it away to a distant land. | High (nonsensical) |
This is a measure of how varied the sentence structure is, including length changes. Text with little variation in sentence structure is usually an indicator of low burstiness and is more likely to be AI-generated. Language models generally stay around 10 to 20 words per sentence as they predict the most likely word to come next in the sentence. But humans tend to vary their sentences, making them less predictable.
Low burstiness | High burstiness |
Similar sentence lengths throughout a paragraph | A mix of sentence types and lengths |
Repetitive grammatical structure | Occasional interruptions, clauses, or sentence fragments |
AI content detection also uses these three other approaches.
Classifiers are supervised ML models trained to distinguish between human and AI writing. These models examine a variety of features like: syntax, vocabulary, grammar, even punctuation, to estimate authorship.
Popular algorithms used in AI content classifiers include:
These classifiers output a confidence score (e.g., “78% likely AI-generated”) based on how closely a sample matches known AI patterns. However, classifier accuracy can vary based on the length, topic, and complexity of the input text. Overfitting is a common issue, especially when classifiers are trained on limited data.
Embeddings represent words or phrases as vectors in a high-dimensional space, positioning similar meanings closer together. This numerical representation allows AI to analyze language through:
OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, is developing a "watermarking" system that marks AI-generated text with an invisible identifier that another system can detect. However, the system is still under development, and it's unclear how it will work or if the watermark will stay after editing. It is a promising technique, but its effectiveness in AI detection is still unknown.
Now that we have addressed how AI checkers work, let's understand if their findings are reliable.
AI detectors seem to work fairly well at determining whether text was AI-generated or not, even with longer texts. However, if the text is edited before being run through a detector, the accuracy of the output can diminish since human input has been added to the equation.
Human-written text can also be misidentified as AI if it has low perplexity and burstiness. Current accuracy levels for the most popular AI tools on the market range from 65% to 85%.
That’s why you should avoid using a score in isolation to make high-stakes decisions, especially in academia or hiring.
AI detection tools don’t give you a “yes” or “no” answer. Instead, they provide a probability score that estimates how likely it is that a piece of content was written by an AI model. The higher the score, the more signs the tool detects that align with patterns commonly found in machine-generated text.
But here’s the catch: those scores are best seen as indicators, not final verdicts.
Most tools output a percentage that reflects AI-likelihood. Here's a general breakdown:
Score range | Interpretation |
0–30% | Likely human-written. Natural variation, unpredictability, and nuance present. |
31–69% | Mixed signals. May be edited AI content or very clean human writing. Requires human review. |
70–100% | Strong signs of AI authorship. Predictable phrasing, low sentence variation, and model-consistent patterns. |
AI content detectors and plagiarism checkers serve different purposes, although they both analyze written content for authenticity and originality.
Here's a quick comparison table to show you how these tools differ.
Feature | AI content detectors | Plagiarism checkers |
Purpose | Identify AI-generated writing | Identify copied or unoriginal content |
How it works | Analyzes writing style, structure, and predictability | Compares text against published databases |
What it flags | Machine-written patterns | Duplicate or closely paraphrased content |
Best used for | Authorship verification, content quality control | Copyright compliance, academic honesty |
AI content detectors identify text generated by AI models like GPT. These tools analyze writing patterns, structure, and style to assess whether the content is artificially generated. Their primary focus is on detecting AI-generated content rather than checking for copied material. They look for signs like unnatural phrasing, repetition, and other characteristics typical of AI writing. AI checkers are especially useful in academic and professional environments, where verifying originality is essential.
On the other hand, plagiarism checkers detect instances of copied content. They compare the submitted text against a vast database of previously published works to identify any matches. These tools look for borrowed phrases, sentences, or paragraphs to ensure that the writing is original and free from copyright violations. Plagiarism checker tools are essential for confirming that a piece of content doesn't infringe on others' work.
Using an AI content detector comes with many benefits, even when using it in a business setting. These include:
To explore how artificial intelligence is actively reshaping modern business operations, check out the in-depth AI in business guide, which provides insights into the evolving role of AI in business across content creation, customer engagement, and operational efficiency.
AI detectors are not without their flaws. As advanced as these tools are, they face several technical, contextual, and ethical limitations that users need to be aware of.
* These are the leading AI content detectors as per G2's Summer 2025 Grid® Report.
Got more questions? We have the answers.
No. Most tools operate with accuracy rates between 65% and 85%, meaning false positives and false negatives are both possible.
AI detectors perform best on samples of at least 150–200 words. Short inputs often lack the linguistic data needed to detect patterns like burstiness or perplexity accurately.
Scores that fall in the gray zone (30–70%) should be interpreted cautiously. Look for stylistic clues such as overly consistent sentence structure or unnatural tone, and consider running the content through multiple detectors.
In some cases, yes. Writers use paraphrasing tools, sentence restructuring, or manual editing to reduce detection scores. While this can sometimes bypass detection, most advanced tools still catch deeper patterns, and ethical risks remain.
No. Plagiarism checkers compare content against existing databases to detect duplication. AI-generated content is often “original” in structure but not human-authored, so it won’t show up as plagiarized.
Use longer samples, combine results from more than one detection tool, and always review content manually. These steps increase confidence in the outcome and reduce over-reliance on a single score.
Humans may detect subtle clues in tone, coherence, or phrasing. However, well-edited AI content can closely mimic human writing, which is why detectors remain valuable for deeper analysis.
AI detectors are helpful, but they’re not perfect. They can flag text that looks too smooth, too repetitive, or too structured, but they can’t read between the lines. The strongest use of these tools is as a first filter, because they raise red flags, not final verdicts. If you’re relying on them to catch everything or make judgment calls on their own, you’re setting them up to fail.
Pair detection scores with context, intent, and human review. Use the tools to spot patterns, then decide what matters based on the situation.
Ready to put AI detectors to the test? Explore 2025’s best AI detectors and find the right tool to keep your content original.
This article was originally published in 2024. It has been updated with new information.
Holly Landis is a freelance writer for G2. She also specializes in being a digital marketing consultant, focusing in on-page SEO, copy, and content writing. She works with SMEs and creative businesses that want to be more intentional with their digital strategies and grow organically on channels they own. As a Brit now living in the USA, you'll usually find her drinking copious amounts of tea in her cherished Anne Boleyn mug while watching endless reruns of Parks and Rec.
As a content writer with over a decade of experience, I’ve spent countless hours perfecting my...
How do you know if what you're reading was written by a person or a machine?
Logo recognition is related to object detection, a computer technology linked to computer...
As a content writer with over a decade of experience, I’ve spent countless hours perfecting my...
How do you know if what you're reading was written by a person or a machine?