I Evaluated G2's 8 Best Network Monitoring Software

Hey, is the network acting weird for you, too?
I barely had time to respond before more messages flooded in. File transfers stalled, video calls froze mid-sentence, and even logging into essential apps became impossible. Productivity across the office ground to a stop.

As an employee in one of my earlier jobs, I wasn’t in charge of the network, but I was certainly feeling the pain. Deadlines loomed, and frustration built up as we sat there, unable to do our jobs. IT scrambled to diagnose the issue, but it was all guesswork without the best network monitoring software. Was it a bandwidth hog? A failing switch? A distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack? Nobody knew.

They rebooted routers, ran basic diagnostics, and tried a few quick fixes, but nothing worked. The hours dragged on, clients were left waiting, and urgent work piled up. Hours later, they finally uncovered the culprit: an unnoticed backup process was silently choking the network with excessive traffic. Once identified, it took minutes to resolve, but the damage was already done: lost time, missed deadlines, frustrated employees, and annoyed customers.

That experience stuck with me. I saw firsthand how expensive and disruptive network blind spots can be. Without real-time network monitoring, small issues spiral into business-wide crises. Performance slows without explanation, security threats go undetected, and outages hit at the worst possible moments.

Recently, evaluated the best network monitoring software using G2's data and user reviews to help others avoid these same headaches. Whether dealing with random slowdowns, unexpected downtime, security threats, or mysterious bandwidth spikes, I’ll help you find the right network monitoring tool in this article. 

IT nightmares? 8 best network monitoring software to end them

Network monitoring software is like having a 24/7 watchtower over a network. It constantly scans, tracks, and analyzes traffic, ensuring everything runs smoothly. Without it, teams would be flying blind, waiting for something to break before realizing there’s a problem. With it, they get real-time visibility into a network’s health to fix issues before they become full-blown outages. There's a reason why the global network monitoring market is projected to reach USD 8.24 billion by 2032.

The best network monitoring software collects data and makes sense of it. There are tools that pinpoint bandwidth hogs, detect security threats, and alert users when something goes wrong. Instead of scrambling to diagnose slow connections or downtime, you get instant insights into where the problem is and how to fix it.

During my evaluation, I’ve also learned that not all network monitoring tools are created equal. Some only track basic metrics, while the best ones give you a complete picture, from latency and packet loss to unusual traffic spikes and unauthorized access attempts. The right software helps prevent these issues before they impact business operations.

After digging through hundreds of reviews for multiple network monitoring solutions, I’ve found that the best tools are fast, reliable, and easy to use. They don’t bury users in complicated logs or require constant babysitting. Instead, they deliver real-time alerts, smart automation, and clear insights that keep a network running smoothly with minimal effort.

How I evaluated the best network monitoring software solutions

Here’s what I considered while evaluating the best networking monitoring tools.

• Real-time monitoring and alerts: When evaluating network monitoring software, I focus on real-time monitoring and alerts because detecting issues as they happen is crucial. Without real-time visibility, small problems can escalate into costly outages. The best tools provide continuous monitoring and instant alerts via email, SMS, or integrations with platforms like Slack. I look for software that allows users to set custom thresholds for performance metrics like CPU usage, bandwidth consumption, and latency. A strong alerting system ensures users can respond quickly before customers notice a problem.
• Protocol and device compatibility: Networks comprise various devices and operating systems, all communicating through different protocols. If a monitoring tool lacks support for key protocols like SNMP, ICMP, or NetFlow, it won’t give users full visibility into their infrastructure. I prefer tools that track performance across routers, switches, servers, cloud environments, and IoT devices. Without this level of compatibility, gaps in monitoring can leave critical issues undetected.
• Bandwidth and traffic analysis: I look for software that tracks bandwidth usage and analyzes traffic patterns to identify bottlenecks and unauthorized activity. Users can optimize performance and allocate bandwidth where needed by pinpointing which applications or users consume the most resources. Historical data tracking is equally important for forecasting future network capacity needs and avoiding unexpected slowdowns.
• Threat detection and security monitoring: A good network monitoring tool can detect anomalies like unusual traffic spikes, unauthorized access attempts, and potential DDoS attacks. Some network monitoring solutions integrate with security platforms, adding an extra layer of protection by detecting and responding to suspicious activity. Without built-in security monitoring, networks are vulnerable to threats that could compromise sensitive data and disrupt operations.
• Cloud and hybrid network support: With more businesses adopting cloud solutions, cloud and hybrid network support has become critical. I look for network monitoring software to track on-premise and cloud-based infrastructures, including AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Hybrid networks are increasingly common, so the ability to monitor both physical and virtualized environments from a single dashboard is essential. Virtual private network (VPN) and remote access monitoring are also crucial, especially as remote work becomes more widespread.
• Reporting and data visualization: A network monitoring tool is only as useful as its ability to present data clearly and actionably. Strong reporting and data visualization help users analyze network trends, troubleshoot recurring issues, and justify upgrades to stakeholders. I prefer tools that offer real-time dashboards, historical trend analysis, and customizable reports. The ability to export reports in multiple formats or integrate with third-party analytics tools makes network monitoring even more valuable.

To be included in the network monitoring software category, a product must:

• Continuously track the performance of an entire computer network
• Establish a standard baseline for network performance metrics
• Notify administrators of crashes or deviations from normal performance
• Recommend solutions when performance issues occur
• Offer visual representations of network performance data

*This data was pulled from G2's Winter 2025 Grid Report. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.  

1. NinjaOne: Best for automated endpoint management

NinjaOne is often highlighted on G2 for its smooth business experience, with a 97% ease of doing business score that reflects how approachable the platform is for IT teams.

One of the biggest advantages I noticed in reviews is their automatic patch management. Keeping systems updated without manual intervention is a huge plus, especially when managing multiple devices. Users don't have to worry about missing security patches or critical updates because the system handles them proactively.

The wide range of remote options available with NinjaOne makes it stand out. Whether IT needs to troubleshoot a workstation, push updates, or monitor system performance, they have multiple ways to access devices remotely. The ability to connect seamlessly without complex setups or additional tools saves time and effort.

A well-designed dashboard and ticketing system can make a huge difference in daily operations, and NinjaOne delivers in this area, according to G2 reviews. Users can track system performance, review alerts, and manage tickets all from a centralized location. This level of visibility helps prioritize issues and ensure that nothing falls through the cracks.

Some monitoring tools can slow down devices, but from what I’ve gathered, NinjaOne seems to have a relatively low system footprint. It’s designed to run in the background without significantly affecting device performance. This is important because no one wants monitoring software that causes lag or disrupts workflow.

While NinjaOne offers robust automation and device management features, G2 user feedback highlights a few areas where teams may want to set expectations or pair it with complementary tools.

NinjaOne’s alerting system covers core monitoring needs and delivers dependable visibility into device health. However, insights from G2 reviewers suggest that the alert customization options could feel limited for teams needing granular control. Some users mention that alerts may be too broad or trigger inconsistently, which can make it harder to act quickly on the most critical issues. For organizations with complex infrastructures, supplementing NinjaOne with specialized alert-tuning or network analytics tools can help achieve more precise results. 

The platform’s reporting tools make it easy to track performance trends and system activity. Still, G2 customer reviews note that report customization can feel constrained, especially for users who want tailored metrics or advanced visualization. The default reports work well for daily operational insight, but businesses with specific compliance or KPI-tracking needs might consider integrating a BI platform for deeper analysis.

NinjaOne’s dashboard gives IT teams a clear overview of devices and alerts in one place. Yet, G2 review data indicates that certain interface elements — like settings and troubleshooting menus — can require extra clicks to locate. This added navigation may slow down workflows at first, though most users report that the platform becomes intuitive once they’re familiar with its layout.

For most IT environments, NinjaOne’s coverage of device and availability metrics is sufficient, but data-intensive networks may benefit from pairing it with more advanced network analytics software.

What I dislike about NinjaOne:

• NinjaOne covers core device-health alerts. Insights from G2 reviewers suggest some teams want more granular, context-aware rules, as alerts can feel generic or inconsistent in certain environments. Light threshold tuning or pairing with a dedicated alerting tool can help.
• Built-in reports surface baseline operational metrics. Users note limited customization for bespoke KPIs, so teams needing highly tailored insights may supplement with a BI tool to align reports with specific business needs.

What G2 users dislike about NinjaOne:

“NinjaOne can be difficult to get off the ground running. While it can be utilized out of the box for most functionality to start with, to really use the tool requires customization. This customization can be difficult at times as it can be a rather large learning curve.

Fortunately there are several avenues for assistance with setup and even assistance after it is up and running. There are engineers available to be scheduled to assist with onboarding issues making this daunting proeces easier. All that being said there are still drawbacks. Implementation can be rough. Figuring out the flow of everything is difficult at first but worth it in the end.”

- NinjaOne Review, Brandon S.

2. Atera: Best for all-in-one IT management

G2 users love Atera’s remote monitoring capability. It provides a solid way to oversee network health without being physically present, which is helpful for IT professionals managing multiple sites. The stability of the remote features means fewer unnecessary trips and quicker troubleshooting. Rated a strong 4.6/5 on G2 also helps in proactive maintenance rather than reacting to problems after they escalate. Knowing you can monitor systems effectively without always being on-site gives users a sense of control. 

The automation tools in Atera help reduce the repetitive work IT teams have to handle. A lot of people appreciate how Atera lets you set up routine maintenance tasks like software updates, system health checks, and alerts with minimal intervention. This not only saves time but also reduces the risk of human error. Automating these processes means IT professionals can focus on higher-priority tasks rather than getting bogged down in routine maintenance. 

Atera generally maintains a stable performance, which is crucial for any network monitoring software. A tool that crashes or lags can create bigger problems than it solves, but Atera seems to hold up well under normal conditions. A stable platform means fewer disruptions when resolving issues or monitoring critical systems.

Atera seems to be constantly evolving, with updates that introduce meaningful improvements. A platform that actively listens to feedback and rolls out useful features feels like a tool worth investing in. Users feel assured that functionality isn’t stagnant, and future updates might address current limitations. 

Atera’s desktop experience is the primary driver for day-to-day administration. G2 user reviews suggest the mobile app trails the desktop in responsiveness and breadth of features, which may matter for admins who manage most workflows on the go. Teams typically keep core actions on desktop and use mobile for quick checks until parity improves — still, the app is useful for light monitoring in a pinch.

Atera delivers comprehensive alert coverage out of the box. G2 feedback suggests that notifications can skew toward lower-priority items, which may create noise for larger environments. Tuning policies, thresholds, and escalation paths, or pairing with a dedicated alert router, often sharpens focus on the most critical issues and reduces fatigue.

Users reflect mixed experiences with response times, some users report quick resolutions, while others note delays during heavier loads. For teams with strict SLAs, enabling premium support or defining internal runbooks can help bridge the gap during peak periods.

Despite these considerations, G2 feedback consistently highlights Atera’s all-in-one convenience and fast time-to-value. For lean IT teams seeking unified RMM, helpdesk, and automation, Atera remains a compelling choice.

What I dislike about Atera:

• While Atera’s mobile app provides some functionality, it doesn’t quite match the capabilities of the desktop version. When working remotely, users expect full control over critical functions, but that’s not always the case here.
• Atera’s notification system tends to send out a flood of alerts, and not all of them are useful. Instead of prioritizing the most critical issues, people sometimes get bombarded with minor notifications that don’t require immediate action. This creates alert fatigue, making it harder to focus on the problems that need attention.

What G2 users dislike about Atera:

“The mobile app could use some love. The account creation and credential assignment could use some automation. It lacks a teams chat integration but I hear that's coming soon. The ticket templates are company-wide, meaning you can't create an onboarding template and only let the HR department access those. Atera could also do well with a Power Automate functionality (e.g. when a ticket is submitted containing password reset or onboarding, reset password based off other attributes or create a user account in M365 tenant respectively.).”

- Atera Review, Verified User in Information Technology and Services

3. Entuity: Best for deep network insight

One of Entuity's strongest points is how it processes and presents network data. Instead of just collecting information, its monitoring algorithm intelligently analyzes network activity to provide actionable insights. This means fewer false alarms and more accurate alerts, and users appreciate how this reduces the time spent chasing down unnecessary notifications.

Instead of relying on periodic checks, it continuously tracks network activity and alerts users immediately when issues arise. I appreciate how this feature can be a lifesaver in large-scale environments where even minor downtime can cause major disruptions. 

Entuity provides a more comprehensive view of network performance than other monitoring tools. It excels at identifying network bottlenecks and performance trends that might not be immediately obvious. G2 reviewers appreciate this level of visibility because it helps them make more informed decisions about resource allocation and infrastructure upgrades.

Entuity focuses on robust network monitoring and analytics. Verified reviews on G2 note that out-of-the-box configuration management is lighter than some competitors. Teams seeking automated config backup/versioning, firmware rollout, or policy enforcement may want to pair Entuity with a dedicated NCM tool to streamline those workflows.

Entuity covers foundational monitoring well. However, few reviewers suggest that support for certain advanced protocols/technologies can be uneven compared with highly specialized platforms, which may matter in very complex or bespoke network environments. Power users often address this by integrating targeted collectors or complementary analysis tools.

Although the platform is optimized around centralized polling, G2 review data indicates a need for more native multi-station polling in highly distributed environments. Organizations that require simultaneous collection across regions typically solve this with additional polling instances or partner tools to achieve full-stack visibility.

Despite these considerations, Entuity is rated 4.7/5 on G2 and frequently highlights Entuity’s strengths in deep network insight, stable performance monitoring, and actionable analytics — making it a strong fit for teams prioritizing visibility and reliability, especially when paired with a purpose-built NCM or distributed collection strategy.

What I dislike about Entuity:

• G2 users feel that entuity lacks strong network configuration management, so you might still need other tools for tasks like firmware updates.
• Users find it frustrating that they can’t poll devices from multiple monitoring stations, making it harder to get a full picture of their network in large environments.

What G2 users dislike about Entuity:

“Simple things, such as being unable to move devices across pollers and filters not staying. When you select something from that filter and return to that view, the filter disappears.”

- Entuity Review, Randy S.

4. LogicMonitor: Best for monitoring complex infrastructures

LogicMonitor automates data collection and simplifies monitoring with metrics across various infrastructure components without requiring extensive manual configuration. This reduces the effort needed to maintain visibility into network performance. I appreciate that this allows teams to focus more on analysis rather than routine monitoring tasks.

Since LogicMonitor is SaaS-based, users don’t have to worry about maintaining on-premise hardware for monitoring. This removes the burden of managing infrastructure just to monitor other infrastructure. A cloud-based setup means the software automatically handles updates and patches, ensuring the latest features and security improvements are always available.

G2 users also find the level of detail in the metrics it collects impressive. It provides high-level summaries and deep insights into network performance, resource utilization, and potential issues. This kind of granularity is valuable when troubleshooting problems or optimizing network performance. Also, the alerting features are rated highly by 91% of G2 users. 

Setting up LogicMonitor is relatively straightforward compared to some other monitoring tools, as noted by the reviews. The process doesn’t require extensive customization to get it up and running. I value this because lengthy deployments can delay productivity and cause frustration among IT teams.

LogicMonitor’s reporting engine captures a broad range of system and performance data. Insights from G2 reviewers note that while reports work well for high-level visibility, customization isn’t as flexible as some users expect. Teams looking for granular, business-specific reporting may need to export data or connect LogicMonitor with a BI tool for more tailored insights.

Frequent UI updates reflect the platform’s focus on continuous improvement, but G2 review data shows that rapid interface changes can sometimes disrupt established workflows. Users who prefer a consistent layout mention needing time to reorient after major updates. That said, most agree the refreshed design ultimately enhances usability once teams adapt to the new flow.

Automation remains one of LogicMonitor’s standout features. G2 user feedback suggests that while its automation is strong, customization can feel limited for organizations with highly specific monitoring needs.

However, users still value how its automation reduces manual work and simplifies management across complex, hybrid infrastructures, one of the reasons it's rated 4.5/5 and continues to earn high satisfaction scores on G2.

What I dislike about LogicMonitor:

• The reporting engine doesn’t offer enough flexibility for customization. With so much data available, IT professionals wish there were better ways to control how reports are generated.
• Frequent UI changes can be frustrating when trying to maintain efficiency. I’d personally prefer a more stable interface instead of constantly adjusting to new layouts.

What G2 users dislike about LogicMonitor:

“Some of the UIs and tabs could use a visual overhaul.”

- LogicMonitor Review, Brandon H.

5. Dynatrace: Best for monitoring digital ecosystems

Dynatrace offers robust tools for monitoring infrastructure, applications, and networks. It provides detailed insights that help diagnose issues efficiently. With its deep observability, I see how it enables teams to track system health in real-time and proactively address potential failures. It seems particularly useful for complex IT environments where multiple interconnected systems require constant oversight.

G2 reviewers like its automated issue detection. Instead of manually sifting through logs or relying on guesswork, the artificial intelligence-driven alerting system quickly identifies performance bottlenecks and anomalies. Notifying teams of potential failures before they escalate can significantly reduce the mean time to resolution (MTTR).

Users appreciate Dynatrace’s ability to provide detailed infrastructure analytics, offering visibility into the performance of servers, networks, and cloud environments. A clear picture of infrastructure health at any given moment is crucial for optimizing performance and resource allocation. I can see how this helps organizations fine-tune their setups and avoid over-provisioning or underutilizing resources. 90% G2 users rate the cloud infrastructure monitoring highly. 

When a service outage occurs, restoring functionality quickly is critical. Dynatrace’s detailed diagnostic tools can help teams rapidly locate the root cause of failures. Users like how the clear breakdowns of dependencies and failure points significantly reduce troubleshooting time.

Dynatrace consolidates extensive features into a single platform. G2 user reviews note that the sheer scope can feel overwhelming at first, especially for teams new to advanced monitoring. Many organizations onboard in stages, starting with core dashboards and guided automation, before expanding to full-stack use.

Back-end and infrastructure coverage are Dynatrace strengths. However, a few G2 users suggest front-end monitoring and alerting may require extra tuning or complementary instrumentation to match the depth seen on services and infrastructure. Teams with stringent UX goals often add user-journey tracing and custom web vitals to surface issues faster.

Dynatrace delivers robust visibility into applications and infrastructure. But, verified reviews on G2 indicate the platform doesn’t natively “watch its own watcher” to the degree some teams expect — meaning customers often set up an external heartbeat or status probe to confirm the Dynatrace tenant’s availability and notify operators if access or data ingestion is impaired. This lightweight out-of-band check helps ensure incidents are visible even if the primary console experiences issues.

Despite these considerations, the overall sentiment analysis consistently highlights Dynatrace’s strengths in intelligent correlation, rapid root-cause analysis, and unified visibility across complex, distributed environments — key reasons it remains a top-tier choice for organizations scaling full-stack observability.

What I dislike about Dynatrace:

• While I recognize Dynatrace's power, the sheer volume of tools can feel overwhelming, according to user reviews. Understanding the features seems steep, especially for teams without experience in advanced observability platforms.
• G2 users find it concerning that Dynatrace cannot monitor itself. If the platform encounters an issue, there’s no built-in way to detect or diagnose failures internally. For a critical network monitoring tool, this feels like a notable blind spot that could slow down incident response.

What G2 users dislike about Dynatrace:

“I can't monitor Dynatrace with Dynatrace and service status.”

- Dynatrace Review, Jennie T.

6. Azure Service Health: Best for Azure service monitoring

Azure Service Health is rated 4.4/5 on G2 and proactively notifies users about potential or ongoing service issues. Instead of waiting for problems to be discovered through manual troubleshooting, users like how it offers alerts about service disruptions before they become major problems. This means users can take preemptive action, whether rerouting traffic, notifying stakeholders, or preparing contingency plans. The proactive nature of the alerts reduces downtime and increases operational resilience.

Having a customized dashboard means IT professionals don’t have to sift through unnecessary details to get the insights they need. Instead of dealing with generic service reports, they can tailor their dashboard to focus only on the specific services and regions that matter to them. This targeted approach improves efficiency because users are not overloaded with irrelevant data. 

Knowing that an issue has occurred is one thing, but understanding why it happened is even more valuable. Azure Service Health provides root cause analysis (RCA) reports, which means users can gain insight into what led to a disruption. Instead of guessing or making assumptions, users reviews note that the software offers a concrete breakdown of the cause, helping them plan better for the future.

Visibility into service health is crucial for organizations that must meet strict compliance requirements. Azure Service Health provides detailed historical data on incidents, which can be essential for audits and compliance reporting. Users appreciate how these reports from Azure Service Health help them justify uptime guarantees or explain service disruptions to regulators.

Azure Service Health surfaces platform-level status, advisories, and resource-impact updates. But, insights from G2 reviewers note it doesn’t replace full network monitoring — teams still turn to dedicated tools for metrics like internal latency, packet loss, and site-to-site connectivity details. Many organizations run Azure Service Health alongside a network monitor to cover both cloud events and internal performance.

Although the service provides post-incident RCA reports, G2 review data suggests detail can be high-level in some cases, which may leave open questions during granular root-cause analysis. Teams facing critical issues often supplement with their own logs/telemetry or correlate Azure Service Health timelines with data from APM/NPM tools for a fuller picture.

Few reviews indicate that when issues are still under investigation, or not yet acknowledged, updates may lag what operators see on third-party monitors or community channels. Many users add a lightweight external status check or cross-reference with independent observability sources to maintain situational awareness.

Overall, feedback consistently highlights Azure Service Health as an essential companion for Azure-centric teams, offering reliable service advisories, impact scoping, and maintenance notifications that help IT prioritize responses and communicate clearly during cloud events.

What I dislike about Azure Service Health:

• Users like that it provides root cause analysis, but sometimes, the reports lack the level of detail needed. Teams will spend extra time figuring out the real issue if the explanation is too vague.
• Since Azure Service Health depends on Microsoft’s updates, users don’t always get immediate information on emerging issues. If Microsoft delays acknowledging a problem, users might have to look elsewhere for details.

What G2 users dislike about Azure Service Health:

“Dependence on Microsoft means there are some issues we cannot intervene in or prevent. It mainly acts as a communication medium for Microsoft-related service outages. Latency issues cannot be monitored or notified by Azure Service Health. We need an additional tool to track those issues externally.”

- Azure Service Health Review, Murugesh P.

7. ManageEngine OpManager: Best for enterprise network management

G2 reviewers appreciate ManageEngine OpManager’s ability to provide a holistic view of an entire network infrastructure. They can see detailed metrics for servers, routers, switches, and applications in one place. This level of visibility makes it easier to pinpoint performance bottlenecks before they become full-blown failures. 

ManageEngine OpManager provides immediate updates so users can respond to potential issues. This means teams can detect sudden spikes in bandwidth usage, CPU overloads, or failing network devices before they cause significant downtime. The dashboards and alerts are designed to keep you proactive rather than reactive, which is critical in environments where even a few minutes of network failure can have serious consequences. 

Troubleshooting network issues can be frustrating, but ManageEngine OpManager provides tools that make the process easier. I read in G2 reviews that users can analyze historical performance trends to identify patterns that might indicate a recurring issue. Another standout feature is the ability to simulate potential network failures and analyze their impact before they occur.

ManageEngine OpManager tracks resource consumption so teams can optimize how bandwidth, CPU, and memory are allocated. If certain devices use more resources than they should, users can take corrective action before it impacts the rest of the network. This proactive approach helps reduce unnecessary expenses, as users can identify whether they need an upgrade or can optimize an existing setup. Also, 91% of G2 reviews rate its diverse systems monitoring highly. Thus, allowing users to monitor activity and performance across a range of IT assets, including servers, databases, and networks.

ManageEngine OpManager offers broad customization options that help teams align monitoring with their environments. Feedback on G2 notes that deeper customizations, such as advanced automation or dashboard personalization, often require scripting knowledge. This can be challenging for users without coding experience, though many appreciate that this flexibility allows technically skilled teams to fine-tune the platform for complex setups.

OpManager is built to scale across large IT environments. G2 reviewers suggest that when networks reach thousands of monitored devices, performance can slow, occasionally delaying alerts or reports. Users managing very large infrastructures often mitigate this by optimizing polling intervals, using distributed servers, or leveraging ManageEngine’s scalability best practices to maintain responsiveness.

The reporting module provides helpful visibility into key network metrics. However, G2 review data indicates that the library of built-in templates can feel limited, and creating custom reports isn’t always intuitive for newer users. Many teams address this by saving frequently used templates or exporting data to BI tools for deeper visualization.

Despite these considerations, ManageEngine OpManager’s strength in enterprise-grade monitoring, fault management, and device visibility is rated highly. Its balance of automation and customization makes it a reliable choice for organizations managing diverse, large-scale network environments.

What I dislike about ManageEngine OpManager:

• While ManageEngine OpManager offers many customization options, I’ve gathered that deeper customizations often require scripting. If users want to tailor the software to meet highly specific monitoring needs, they’d have to write custom scripts, which isn’t always feasible.
• Although ManageEngine OpManager is built for scalability, I’ve seen reports that performance can slow down under heavy workloads. If a network consists of thousands of devices generating large amounts of data, the software may start experiencing delays in alerts and reporting.

What G2 users dislike about ManageEngine OpManager:

“The pre-loaded device templates in the tool are very basic. ManageEngine should invest more in providing ready-to-use templates with the correct data since vendors expose all necessary information through their MIBs.

Additionally, the ability to create templates via REST APIs is currently nonexistent, even though many vendors are shifting toward APIs as the primary method for data collection. We have to develop these templates from scratch using custom scripts, which adds unnecessary complexity.”

- ManageEngine OpManager Review, Verified User in Information Technology and Services

8. Site24x7: Best for cloud-first monitoring

Users like how Site24x7 tracks endpoint events step by step. This level of granularity is invaluable when diagnosing network issues or pinpointing performance bottlenecks. Unlike other monitoring tools that provide only a high-level overview, Site24x7 allows IT professionals to see exactly where delays occur. This feature helps users troubleshoot complex network environments with multiple dependencies. 

Managing multiple resources across a complex network can be overwhelming, but Site24x7 consolidates this into a single platform. There's no need to jump between different tools to monitor servers, applications, and network devices. Instead of having fragmented visibility, everything is centralized, which can improve response times when an issue arises.

G2 reviewers appreciate that Site24x7 offers a broader spectrum of monitoring services, including application and server performance. An all-in-one solution means users wouldn’t need additional software to monitor different IT infrastructure aspects. This is particularly useful when managing large-scale IT environments where different components must work seamlessly.

Site24x7 seems to be actively improving its features. The frequent updates suggest that the developers address customer feedback and stay on top of emerging monitoring needs. I wouldn’t want to invest in a tool that becomes stagnant and fails to keep up with new technologies, so reading reviews that the tool works on these aspects is a huge plus. Regular enhancements also mean the software remains competitive with other network monitoring solutions.

Frequent updates keep the platform moving forward. However, G2 users note that, on occasion, releases have introduced performance or functionality hiccups that required follow-up fixes. Change windows, staged rollouts, and quick rollback plans help teams minimize disruption when adopting new builds.

Site24x7 covers a broad monitoring surface area out of the box. Some G2 reviews mention that some advanced capabilities sit behind higher-tier plans, prompting teams to weigh add-on value against budget. Many organizations start with core features and expand selectively as needs mature to keep costs aligned with outcomes.

Although alert coverage is comprehensive and easy to enable, G2 review data suggests that without tuning, notifications can skew either too noisy or not prioritized enough for fast triage. Teams typically refine thresholds, escalation rules, and maintenance windows, or route alerts through an incident tool, to focus attention on what matters most.

Still, rated 4.6/5 on G2, reviews consistently highlight Site24x7’s cloud-first reach, straightforward setup, and single-pane visibility, a combination that makes it an appealing choice for teams consolidating monitoring across apps, servers, networks, and websites.

What I dislike about Site24x7:

• Frequent updates are usually good, but I’ve seen feedback that Site24x7’s updates sometimes cause system disruptions. I wouldn’t want to rely on a monitoring tool that becomes unstable because of its updates.
• While Site24x7 offers many useful features, some advanced capabilities are locked behind higher-tier pricing plans. It’s frustrating to have to pay extra for features that feel essential for network monitoring.

What G2 users dislike about Site24x7:

“There seem to be a few bugs that occasionally add extra monitors. These issues are addressed quickly, but they are still concerning when working with a limited number of monitors. Maxing out unexpectedly means I have to manually delete them or remove the base monitor and start over. It’s not a dealbreaker, but it can be frustrating.”

- Site24x7 Review, Daniel M.

Best network monitoring software: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Have more questions? Find the answers below. 

Q1. What's the leading network monitoring software for business use?

Site24x7 is a strong default for most businesses thanks to its cloud-first design that monitors networks, servers, apps, and websites from a single dashboard. If your environment is hybrid or complex, LogicMonitor is a solid alternative, and ManageEngine OpManager fits classic enterprise network management.

Q2. What are the leading network monitoring tools for IT managers?

Atera stands out for IT managers who want everything in one place — RMM, helpdesk, and automation — without tool sprawl. NinjaOne excels at automated endpoint management, while OpManager suits teams overseeing larger, diverse networks.

Q3. Which network monitoring app is best for medium-sized enterprises?

ManageEngine OpManager is a great fit for midsize orgs that need dependable performance and fault management across varied devices. Consider Site24x7 for a lighter, cloud-first approach or LogicMonitor if you’re running hybrid/distributed infrastructure.

Q4. What are the top-rated network monitoring service for startups?

Site24x7 is startup-friendly: quick to adopt, broad coverage, and minimal overhead. Atera is another strong pick for lean teams that want RMM plus helpdesk in one console.

Q5. What is the best-rated network monitoring service for remote offices?

Site24x7 shines for distributed teams, giving you a centralized cloud view across locations. If you’re juggling complex hybrid networks, LogicMonitor provides deeper, automated visibility.

Q6. What is the best network monitoring software for small business?

Atera simplifies life for small teams by combining monitoring with helpdesk and automation. NinjaOne is also SMB-friendly, especially if endpoint automation is a priority.

Q7. What are the top network monitoring software recommended for tech companies?

Dynatrace is ideal for modern tech stacks, tracing transactions end-to-end and tying application performance to network behavior. LogicMonitor works well for unified monitoring across hybrid and multi-cloud setups, and Entuity adds granular analytics when deep network insight matters.

Q8. What is the most reliable network monitoring solution for large corporations?

Dynatrace is a proven choice for large, complex digital ecosystems that demand full-stack observability. ManageEngine OpManager remains a dependable enterprise network workhorse, with LogicMonitor and Entuity rounding out options for hybrid scale and deep analytics.

Q9. What is the best software to monitor network for SaaS companies?

Dynatrace helps SaaS providers track user journeys and service dependencies with end-to-end tracing. LogicMonitor complements distributed cloud operations, and Site24x7 offers broad, cost-conscious coverage for fast-growing teams.

Q10. What is the best network management app for cloud services?

Site24x7 is built for cloud-first monitoring across apps, servers, networks, and sites. If you’re heavily on Microsoft Azure, Azure Service Health is essential alongside your primary monitor for real-time Azure service and resource alerts.

Shut down blind spots before they shut down your network

Network issues bring work to a halt, create security risks, and leave everyone frustrated. 

I’ve seen firsthand how a single blind spot can cause hours of downtime, missed deadlines, and lost productivity. Without the right network monitoring software, IT teams are left scrambling to figure out what’s wrong instead of fixing problems before they escalate. A good monitoring tool gives you real-time visibility, alerts you to issues before they get out of hand, and helps keep everything running smoothly.

When picking the right network security monitoring software, consider what matters most for your setup. Do you need real-time alerts, security monitoring, or advanced traffic analysis? Ensure the tool can scale with your network, is easy to use, and provides the level of detail you need to troubleshoot quickly. The right choice can mean the difference between a minor hiccup and a full-blown network disaster.

Wish to monitor servers, applications, networks, databases, and more? Try the best enterprise monitoring software.