Nice to meet you.

Enter your email to receive our weekly G2 Tea newsletter with the hottest marketing news, trends, and expert opinions.

9 Best Free Music Making Software That Didn’t Ruin My Mix

February 20, 2025

best free music making software

By day, I craft content strategies. By night, I dream of crafting beats. 

And in between? I wonder why every decent music production tool costs as much as a high-end SaaS subscription. I can justify a CRM for work, but dropping hundreds on audio editing software just to see if I might be good at music production? That’s a hard sell.

So instead of making a financially questionable decision, I did what any marketer with a side hobby would do: I went on a mission to find the best free music making software.

But here’s the thing: with free software, you start asking the real questions: does it have multi-track recording? Can I actually mix without hitting some weird limitation? Does exporting a track feel like sending a spaceship to orbit, or is it actually user-friendly?

I tested 30+ tools against several parameters. I checked how easy it was to lay down tracks, tweak synths, and stack effects without breaking my flow. I played around with automation to see if I could build smooth transitions, and I tested built-in virtual instruments to separate the good from the “this sounds like it was recorded through a tin can.”

After plenty of trial and error, I found the best free music making software that blew me away with pro-level features and was actually worth using. 

9 best free music making software 

Music making software lets me record, edit, mix, and produce music from my laptop. Whether I’m layering drum loops, tweaking synths, or just messing around with sound effects, this is where everything comes together.

These tools serve as a virtual recording studio. I can stack multiple tracks, add effects, adjust levels, and hit undo about 50 times until something finally sounds right. Some music making software is built for full-scale music production, while others focus on beat-making, live performance, or simple audio editing. And when it comes to free software, I’ve learned that some are surprisingly powerful, while others feel more like a digital notepad for sound.

So when I tested free music making software, I paid close attention to what actually matters: can I record and edit multiple tracks? Are there built-in virtual instruments that don’t sound like they were recorded on a potato? Does it support plugins so I can expand my sound library? And most importantly, does it crash when I try to do too much?

How did I find and evaluate the best free music making software?

I spent weeks testing these free music making software: setting up projects and putting them to work to see what they could do. I recorded tracks, layered instruments, tweaked effects, and exported files to find out which ones held up and which ones fell apart under real-world use. For the software I was already familiar with, I took a step back and reevaluated it with a fresh perspective. 

 

I also used AI to analyze G2 user reviews and understand common pain points, what people loved and hated, and whether these tools lived up to the hype. In cases where I couldn’t personally test a tool due to limited access, I consulted a professional with hands-on experience and validated their insights using verified G2 reviews. The screenshots featured in this article may include those captured during testing and those obtained from the vendor’s G2 page.

What makes the best free music making software worth it 

The best free music making software isn’t just about features. It’s about how easy it is to bring creative ideas to life. 

  • Ease of use and workflow: Music production already has a learning curve, so I wanted software that didn’t slow me down with clunky menus or confusing layouts. the creative process with an intuitive layout and accessible controls. Navigating menus, adding tracks, and adjusting settings should feel natural rather than a constant battle. A cluttered interface or complicated workflow can kill momentum, so software that allows quick, efficient music production stood out the most.
  • Virtual instruments and sound library: Music making software should have at least some built-in instruments and sounds, so I tested the ones included in each tool. High-quality synths, drum kits, and orchestral instruments add versatility, while sound customization options enhance creative control. Software that relies entirely on third-party instruments without offering anything built-in makes it harder to get started, especially for beginners.
  • Plugin support and expandability: One of my biggest deal-breakers was whether I could use third-party VSTs. Some free music making software locks you into its own ecosystem, meaning you can’t expand your instrument and effects collection. Others allow full VST/AU support, meaning I could add better synths, drum machines, and mixing tools as needed. Expandability is key for music making software, so the ability to integrate external plugins and gear was a must-have.
  • Recording and editing capabilities: Good audio and MIDI recording is essential even if you’re just making beats. I tested whether I could record multiple tracks at once, how easy it was to edit takes, and if the software supported features like punch-in recording and MIDI quantization. I also looked at automation (adjusting volume, effects, and filters), which is essential for a polished mix. Some music making tools handled recording like a dream, while others made basic tasks way harder than they needed to be.
  • Performance and stability: A tool that crashes mid-project is an absolute nightmare. I stress-tested each by layering multiple tracks, loading heavy virtual instruments, and automating effects to see how well they handled it. Frequent lag, instability, or limited processing power makes music production frustrating and inefficient. The best-performing tools optimized resources well, allowing for smooth playback and real-time adjustments without issues.
  • Export options and file compatibility: What’s the point of making music if you can’t share it? I checked whether each software supported high-quality exports (like WAV and MP3) and if they played nice with other software. Things like easy file transfers and clean exports matter, especially if you plan to move your projects to more advanced music making software later. Free software should still let users export their work without compromise; the best ones did that.

The list below contains genuine user reviews from the best audio editing software category page. In the context of this list, vendors offering free trials are also considered free. To be included in this category, a solution must:

  • Allow users to upload and/or record audio files
  • Provide tools for clipping, arranging, and manipulating audio
  • Save and export completed files in one or more file types

*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.  

1. GarageBand

If you’re just getting into music production and own a Mac, GarageBand is the best free music making software that makes everything feel effortless. It’s a fully functional music making tool, not just a stripped-down demo of Logic Pro. 

Right from the start, I noticed how polished and intuitive the interface felt. I didn't struggle to figure out how to add tracks, tweak MIDI notes, or access effects. Everything was exactly where I expected it to be. Unlike other tools that bury key features under layers of menus, GarageBand keeps things simple without dumbing it down.

GarageBand

One of the biggest highlights was the built-in virtual instruments. The pianos, synths, and drum kits sound way better than you’d expect from a free music maker. I tried out the synth patches first and was surprised by how rich and layered they were. I didn’t feel I needed external plugins immediately. The drum kits were another standout.

Instead of forcing me to program every single hit manually, GarageBand’s Smart Drums let me create patterns quickly by dragging drum elements into a grid. This made it ridiculously easy to build beats without getting lost in the technical side of MIDI sequencing.

Apple Loops is a lifesaver for someone who just wants to get ideas down fast. I tested this by dragging in loops from different genres to see how well they worked together, and it was seamless. Everything snapped to tempo without needing manual adjustments, and the loops sounded high quality, unlike stock filler sounds. This made it easy to create full arrangements without starting from scratch.

When it came to recording, GarageBand handled multi-track recording smoothly, and I had zero issues layering takes. The guitar amp simulations were surprisingly good, letting me plug in my guitar directly without an external amp. I tested a few presets, and while they weren’t mind-blowing, they were definitely usable for quick recordings and demo tracks.

Where GarageBand started to feel limited was in mixing and plugin support. The built-in effects are decent for basic production, but there’s no third-party plugin support, so I couldn’t load any VSTs or AUs beyond Apple’s own instruments and effects. This was a huge downside when I wanted to experiment with different synths or mix them with my preferred EQs and compressors. The automation tools were also a bit basic, and I wished for more precise control when adjusting effects over time.

Exporting was another area where I hit some restrictions. While GarageBand lets you export in WAV and MP3, the customization options are pretty barebones. There’s no easy way to export stems individually or tweak bitrate settings, which could be frustrating for anyone planning to move their project to a more advanced solution later.

What I like about GarageBand:

  • I tested the stock synths, pianos, and drum kits, expecting them to sound average, but they didn’t. The synths have depth, the drum kits are crisp, and the pianos are shockingly good for a free tool. This meant I didn’t feel an immediate need to hunt down external plugins just to get a decent sound.
  • I could drag in pre-made loops, adjust tempos, and instantly create full arrangements without starting from scratch. The loops are categorized well, so finding something that matched my vibe was easy.

What G2 users like about GarageBand:

“Integrating, uploading, and exporting across all Apple suites and platform tech is INCREDIBLY convenient even when not using inherently just Apple products. Also integrates with several major platforms outside of Apple products and is intuitive to use. Great for keeping track in line with each other. In short, this has a very high ease of implementation for Apple users. The customer support is solid: you can go to a Genius bar or lean on Apple's massive support network. When I worked heavier in content creation, I had a very high frequency of use for this (3 times a day minimum).”

 

- GarageBand Review, Iyer A.

What I dislike about GarageBand:
  • As great as this free tool is, it’s completely locked into the Apple ecosystem. If you’re on Windows, GarageBand isn’t an option unless you want to hack your way around it (which I don’t recommend).
  • While I could adjust EQ, compression, and reverb, the control wasn’t nearly as deep as what you'd get in pro tools. There are no advanced routing, bus mixing, or detailed automation options, making it harder to get a truly polished final mix.
What G2 users dislike about GarageBand:

“Garageband has most of the features such as music recording, Mixing, and audio editing on Mac. but the feature we all users want is to bring it to Playstore and Windows. because most of the phone users in India are Android, and they use Windows laptops. Need to focus more on integration in the features section on mobile app.”

- GarageBand Review, Durga Shankar D.

AI is changing the way music is created, mixed, and even composed, and if you’re not paying attention, you might be missing out. Check out our guide on AI in music and discover how technology is reshaping creativity.

2. Logic Pro X

If you’re serious about music production and want to test out a pro music maker, Logic Pro X is easily one of the best options out there. Unlike some “free trials” with annoying limitations, Logic Pro X gives you full access to every feature for three months, which is more than enough time to decide if it’s the right tool for you.

Logic Pro X

One of the biggest highlights was Alchemy, a monster of a synth. I went through its preset library, and the sounds were studio-quality right out of the box—deep basses, cinematic pads, aggressive leads, and experimental textures. When I started tweaking, I realized how much control I had over waveforms, modulation, and filters, making it easy to build custom patches.

Even if you know nothing about sound design, the morphing capabilities and preset variations make this synth an absolute powerhouse.

Another standout was the Drummer feature, which let me create dynamic, human-like drum tracks in seconds. Instead of spending hours programming drum patterns manually, I could select a style and adjust intensity and complexity, and the AI-generated performance felt incredibly natural.

When I moved to mixing, I was blown away by the amount of pro-level tools available. The EQ and compressors had analog-modeled options that felt like real studio gear, and I could route tracks into buses, set up parallel processing, and automate effects with precision. I even used Flex Time and Flex Pitch to tweak timing and correct vocal performances without making them sound unnatural.

However, Logic Pro X is definitely more complex, and I can see how it might overwhelm beginners. Unlike GarageBand, which allows you to dive in and start making music immediately, Logic requires some learning. 

The interface is dense with pro-level features, and even though it’s well-organized, it took me some time to get comfortable with it. 

What I like about Logic Pro X:

  • MIDI editing tools are incredibly detailed. Logic gave me full control over velocity, expression, quantization, and automation, making it easy to fine-tune performances in a way that GarageBand doesn’t allow.
  • The Alchemy synth is ridiculously powerful. I spent hours tweaking the built-in presets and playing with the modulation options. Even if you know nothing about synthesis, the sounds you can get out of Alchemy are next-level.

What G2 users like about Logic Pro X:

“I love Logic. I love how it's really the next level up from Garageband. I first started using it in Audio Engineering school at SAE in 2016. Logic Pro was my go-to when I was terrified of using Pro Tools when learning to record myself as an artist. Because BootCamp messes with my computer in 2022, it's my go-to for everything: audio for making beats and producing and recording vocals. I absolutely love Drummer's track Its Apple Loops. It was so crazy learning Usher's Love In This Club was just 2 Apple Loops that Polo Da Don put together, and it became a loop. Logic is my audio best friend. For beatmaking out of the major ones Pro tools, FL and Ableton, all my money on Logic.”

 

- Logic Pro X Review, Kiearra D. S.

What I dislike about Logic Pro X:
  • While Logic is incredibly powerful, I didn’t find it as beginner-friendly. The interface is dense, and learning how to take full advantage of everything takes time.
  • The platform is Mac-only, so Windows users are out of luck. Like GarageBand, Logic is completely locked into Apple’s ecosystem, with no Windows version available.
What G2 users dislike about Logic Pro X:

“The thing that I dislike most about Logic Pro X is that the software can sometimes get overwhelmed with the number of voice and instrument channels you implement. Even with a Mac Book Pro with 16 GM of RAM, more than 8 different channels bogged down Logic Pro X, which was very laggy. The ultimate sound that came out of the work was outstanding, but the process itself was frustrating. I would recommend no more than 6 channels when creating music, which can limit some of the scope you may have been envisioning.”

- Logic Pro X Review, Beau K.

Whether you’re producing beats, recording vocals, or mixing tracks, understanding audio editing is the next step in leveling your sound. Check out our guide now!

3. Audacity

Audacity is more of an audio editing powerhouse than a music production suite. But that doesn’t mean it’s not worth using. In fact, if you need a free tool to record, edit, and clean up audio with minimal fuss, Audacity is one of the best out there.

Since I’ve used Audacity before, I wanted to test it again with a fresh perspective. Setting it up took no time at all. It’s lightweight, runs on almost any computer, and doesn’t require an account or registration. 

Audacity

The first thing I tested was a multi-track audio recording, which worked flawlessly. I recorded a few vocal tracks and tested how well I could edit them, and Audacity made it super easy to trim, cut, and move clips around. The editing tools are precise and straightforward, which is great for podcast editing, voiceovers, and simple track arrangements.

While the interface isn’t flashy, I had access to equalization, compression, reverb, pitch shifting, and time-stretching, all of which worked surprisingly well. The EQ tools, in particular, were detailed enough for real mixing adjustments. Plus, there are no hidden fees, premium versions, or limitations. Audacity gives you everything upfront, and that’s rare in free music making software.

Next, I played around with the built-in effects, and this is where Audacity really shines. I tested noise reduction, which is an absolute lifesaver for cleaning up background hiss, and it worked incredibly well. I also applied reverb, pitch shifting, and time stretching, and while the interface isn’t fancy, the effects got the job done. The equalizer and compressor tools were surprisingly effective at shaping sound, and I could tweak audio frequencies with more control than I expected from a free tool.

Where Audacity started to feel a bit limiting was in music production. There’s no built-in MIDI support, so if you want to create tracks with virtual instruments, this isn’t the tool for you. Audacity is strictly for recording and manipulating audio—not sequencing beats or composing music. Also, the interface feels dated, and while it’s functional, it’s definitely not the most visually appealing software out there.

Despite these limitations, Audacity is an absolute workhorse for audio editing. Whether you’re cleaning up vocals, editing podcasts, or working with raw audio files, it’s one of the best free tools available.

What I like about Audacity:

  • It’s super lightweight and easy to set up. I didn’t have to go through an installer with a million steps or create an account. I just downloaded it, launched it, and was recording within minutes. It runs smoothly on almost any computer, which is great for older machines.
  • The multi-track recording is solid. I recorded multiple vocal tracks to test how well it handled layering, and everything worked smoothly. The waveform view made it easy to edit clips, and I had no issues moving, cutting, or trimming audio precisely.

What G2 users like about Audacity:

“It is open source and free, so it is a first choice for students and beginners. Well then, too, there are many effects and tools. It’s a multi-track audio system that I can rely on for multiple musical tasks like cutting, mixing, editing, etc. The ability to edit and export multiple audio files simultaneously and change the speed and pitch of andy audio clip are superb things that I like the most.”

 

- Audacity Review, Yash S.

What I dislike about Audacity:
  • Unlike pro tools, which allow me to tweak effects while listening in real time, Audacity required me to apply the effect first and then play it back. This made adjusting reverb and EQ slightly slower than I would have liked.
  • Audacity is great for editing individual tracks but lacks advanced mixing tools like automation, bus routing, and sidechain compression, which are essential for full music production.
What G2 users dislike about Audacity:

“When I mix two audio tracks I sometimes have problems with the application since it sticks and stops working automatically closing, which generates a loss of concentration and takes valuable time away from me. Besides, you can't always suppress the voice of a song, which makes me uncomfortable when I want to extract the background music for a project.”

- Audacity Review, Peter N.

If you're looking for the best free software to edit vocals, clean up audio, and produce professional-quality recordings, check out the best free podcast editing software.

4. Ableton Live

When I think of music production software that’s built for real-time creativity, Ableton Live is the first name that comes to mind. It’s one of the most popular music makers in the industry, especially for electronic music producers and live performers. But since I was testing the free version (Ableton Live Lite), I wanted to see how much I could actually do without paying.

Ableton Live

Right away, the Session View stood out. Instead of working in a linear arrangement, I could trigger and layer loops in real time, which made it feel like an instrument rather than just a recording tool. I tested it by setting up a few drum loops, basslines, and synths, and I could remix and rearrange them on the fly. This made it insanely fun for jamming and experimenting with ideas, and I could see why it’s a favorite for live performances.

I also explored Ableton’s stock audio warping tools, which let me stretch, pitch, and sync audio clips to different tempos without ruining their quality. I tested this by taking an acapella vocal sample and warping it to fit over a completely different beat, and the results were seamless. Unlike basic time-stretching, Ableton's warping modes preserve transients and tone, meaning I didn’t end up with weird, robotic-sounding artifacts.

On the MIDI side, the free version has a limited selection of instruments, but the ones included were surprisingly good. I played around with Drum Rack, which let me build custom drum kits by dragging in different samples. It’s a must-have feature for beatmakers since I could intuitively layer kicks, snares, and hi-hats. The MIDI clip editing tools were another highlight. I could tweak note length and velocity and apply groove templates to make programmed beats sound more human.

Where the free version started to feel limited was track count and plugin restrictions. I could only use up to 8 tracks per project, which was fine for small ideas but quickly became a bottleneck when I tried to arrange a full song. It also doesn’t support third-party VST plugins, meaning I had to rely on Ableton’s built-in instruments and effects. The export options were also more restricted than I’d like, especially if you’re used to having full control over audio quality settings.

That said, Ableton Live Lite is still one of the best free tools for electronic music producers, especially if you’re into loop-based production or live performance. It’s a great introduction to the Ableton workflow, even if the free version has limitations.

What I like about Ableton Live:

  • Instead of being stuck in a rigid timeline, I could trigger different audio and MIDI clips in real-time, layering elements on the fly. This made the idea generation feel completely different from others. It was like remixing my own track as I built it.
  • I loved how I could drag in my own samples, layer multiple kicks or snares, and tweak each sound separately. It gave me full control over my drums without needing an external sampler plugin.

What G2 users like about Ableton Live:

“I really enjoy Ableton Live's simplistic user interface, allowing me to select a VST and produce music instantaneously easily. I very much enjoy using Ableton Live's Analog synth, as it allows you full control over shaping the sound by adjusting the instrument. Ableton's layout is also visually appealing, making it a software I can spend a lot of time using.”

 

- Ableton Live Review, Callum B.

What I dislike about Ableton Live:
  • One of the biggest downsides was not being able to load my favorite synths, samplers, or effects. I had to rely entirely on Ableton’s built-in sounds, which, while decent, felt limiting when I wanted to explore new sound design possibilities.
  • Export options felt a bit basic. When I tried exporting a track, I realized I had limited control over bitrates, formats, and audio stems. If I wanted to fine-tune my final export, I would’ve needed more options for bounce settings.
What G2 users dislike about Ableton Live:

“I wish there was a simpler mechanism to output audio from Ableton without using a third-party solution. My implementation has an audio interface as the input, and I need to output to a virtual device. It would be much better if the virtual device could be built into Ableton.”

- Ableton Live Review, Rob A.

Great music starts with great recordings. If you're on a mac and need crystal-clear vocal or instrument recordings, check out the best audio recording software for mac.

5. FL Studio

FL Studio has a legendary reputation for music production, especially in hip-hop and electronic music. It’s known for its fast workflow, powerful piano roll, and endless customization, but when I tested the free version, I quickly realized it comes with some major catches. 

Unlike most free music making software that imposes track limits or removes features, FL Studio lets you use everything, but with one big restriction: you can’t reopen saved projects. You can make a full track, export it, and listen back, but if you close the project, it’s gone forever unless you upgrade.

FL Studio

That limitation aside, I wanted to see how much I could actually accomplish within a single session. FL Studio’s workflow is built around the Channel Rack and Pattern Sequencer, which felt incredibly fluid for beat-making and loop-based production. I tested out the step sequencer by programming a quick drum loop, and it took me less than a minute to get something solid going. The interface felt fast and intuitive, and I could quickly tweak note placement, velocity, and swing to get a more natural feel.

One of FL Studio’s biggest strengths is its Piano Roll, which is hands-down one of the most powerful features. I tested it by programming a MIDI chord progression and adding slides and automation, and it gave me insane control over every note’s placement, dynamics, and articulation. It’s perfect for melodic composition, especially if you’re into intricate melodies and detailed MIDI editing.

I also explored FL Studio’s built-in instruments, which were surprisingly well-stocked for a free version. Sytrus and FLEX were my favorites. Sytrus gave me deep FM synthesis options, while FLEX had a solid collection of modern presets that worked well for electronic music. The stock drum kits and effects were also solid, but I could tell that some of the best sounds were locked behind the paid version.

The mixing workflow was where things got frustrating. FL Studio doesn’t automatically route every track to the mixer, so I had to manually assign each element to a mixer track before adding effects. It wasn’t a huge issue once I got the hang of it, but it did slow me down compared to other DAWs, where this happens automatically. That said, the built-in effects were great, and I loved being able to stack multiple effects on a single track and tweak them in real time.

Ultimately, FL Studio’s free version is powerful but has a huge tradeoff. If you’re okay with only working in single sessions and never reopening projects, it’s a great way to experience beat-making and MIDI composition. But if you need actually to save and revisit your work, you’ll hit a wall fast.

What I like about FL Studio:

  • Instead of locking me into one workflow, FL Studio lets me rearrange everything, resize windows, and customize the color scheme to match my preference. This made it feel like a truly personal workspace.
  • The Piano Roll is the best I’ve used in a free tool. I had full control over note placement, automation, and articulation, and the ability to add slides and glides made melodic programming incredibly fluid. 

What G2 users like about FL Studio:

“Without a doubt, one of the things I like most about FL Studio compared to other DAWs is its interface since it has simplicity and organization that makes work very fluid. In addition, native plugins are authentic gems that new users can count on the most advanced professionals.

One of the most essential features to consider is the free updates for life, which add points to opting for FL Studio, together with Image Line's support for this DAW.”

 

- FL Studio Review, Mario B.

What I dislike about FL Studio:
  • While I had access to some great instruments and FX, many presets and expansions were unavailable, making the free version feel limited regarding sound design.
  • I couldn’t load any external plugins, meaning I was stuck using only FL Studio’s stock instruments and effects. This will be a major limitation if you rely on third-party synths or mixing plugins.
What G2 users dislike about FL Studio:

“Since it is a resource-intensive DAW, there is room for improvements as far as RAM Management is concerned compared to its competitors like Ableton, Logic Pro X, and Presonus Studio One. There are certain buggy patches as far as bridging 3rd party VSTs are concerned, but the update and resolution frequency is less as there are a lot of VSTs coming in the market today that need compatibility for both Live as well as for Production.”

- FL Studio Review, Jeswin J.

6. Sound Forge

Sound Forge has been around for decades, and it’s known for being a powerful audio editing tool rather than a full music production tool. I tested the free version to see how well it handled recording, editing, and audio processing compared to other free software. 

Right away, it was clear that Sound Forge is built for people who need precise waveform editing, not for beat-making, MIDI composition, or multi-track production.

Sound Forge

Setting up was quick, and the interface felt clean and professional. I started by recording some vocals and testing how easily I could trim, cut, and manipulate the audio. Editing felt incredibly smooth, and I could zoom in to edit waveforms with surgical precision. Compared to some other free audio editors that feel clunky, Sound Forge made cutting, fading, and adjusting audio levels feel natural and responsive.

One of the standout features was the real-time preview for effects processing. I tested the built-in EQ, reverb, and compression. Unlike some editors, where I have to apply an effect and listen to the result, Sound Forge lets me tweak settings while hearing the changes in real time. This made dialing in the right sound easier without much trial and error.

I also played around with the noise reduction tools, which cleaned up background hiss and unwanted sounds well. Sound Forge is a solid choice for podcasting, voiceovers, or any kind of vocal post-production. The time-stretching and pitch-shifting tools were another highlight—I tested them by slowing down and tuning a vocal sample, and the audio remained clean without turning into a garbled mess.

That said, Sound Forge is mainly an audio editor. There’s no MIDI support, no virtual instruments, and no way to arrange multiple tracks into a full song. If I wanted to make beats, layer instruments, or produce full music tracks, I’d need a separate software.

Also, while the free version had a good selection of effects, some of the best tools, like advanced mastering plugins, were locked behind the paid version.

What I like about Sound Forge:

  • Cutting, trimming, and adjusting audio was smooth and intuitive, and I could zoom in as much as I needed for precise waveform editing. This made it one of the best free editors I’ve used for detailed audio work.
  • When applying EQ, reverb, or compression, I could hear changes in real-time while adjusting settings instead of applying the effect first and then undoing it if I didn’t like the result. This saved a ton of time when dialing in the right sound.

What G2 users like about Sound Forge:

“One of Sound Forge's strengths is the multitude of tasks involved in automatic processing of audio files. I don't have to spend a lot of time manually selecting tracks. For example, silently deleting breaks and sections would allow the auto cut/trim tool (process menu). This function is very useful to me because it will detect the part of the data whose signal level is higher than that determined by Sound Forge. Sound Forge considers such a part to be the end of the desired passage or the beginning of a fragment of silence. This program is very useful for me.”

 

- Sound Forge Review, Pompe Andreanta H.

What I dislike about Sound Forge:
  • It’s geared toward experienced audio editors. If you’re new to waveform editing, there’s a learning curve, and you might need to watch some tutorials to get comfortable.
  • While I could export WAV and MP3 files, the free version didn’t offer some professional formats, which could be limiting if you need full control over the final audio quality.
What G2 users dislike about Sound Forge:

“Sound Forge is seemingly geared more towards wave file editing and not really sound sequencing. There are layering and sequencing capabilities, but we can't organize them in a precise way as we would with typical music workstation applications. I'm not sure if MIDI is a primary option for more advanced sound development in Sound Forge, but from the looks of it, Sound Forge is not an ideal solution for MIDI productions.”

- Sound Forge Review, Lea N.

7. Studio One

Studio One has built a solid reputation as a powerful, modern music maker, and I was curious to see how much I could actually do with its free version, Studio One Prime. It feels like a complete music production tool, making it a great choice for songwriters, vocalists, and producers looking for an intuitive way to arrange full tracks.

From the start, Studio One’s drag-and-drop workflow stood out. I could drag loops, instruments, and effects directly onto the timeline, making everything feel fluid and natural. This was especially useful when I tested its multi-track recording and arranging capabilities. I could easily move sections around, duplicate parts, and tweak arrangements without dealing with unnecessary steps. 

Studio One

One feature that really impressed me was Pattern Mode for MIDI sequencing. Instead of programming MIDI notes individually, I could create step-based patterns, tweak velocity curves, and introduce variation without feeling mechanical. This made building dynamic basslines and intricate drum patterns surprisingly easy. Studio One Prime, unlike typical step sequencers, adds expressiveness, making MIDI programming feel more musical.

Another major win was the included Presence XT sampler, which gave me access to a solid selection of acoustic and electronic instruments. While some free DAWs come with basic, uninspiring sounds, Studio One’s stock instruments had more depth and character than I expected. I tested its orchestral strings, synths, and electric pianos, and while it doesn’t have the most extensive library, the sound quality was good enough to build full tracks without needing extra plugins.

I didn’t expect to like the built-in Chord Track, which let me experiment with different chord progressions on the fly. I tested this by playing a simple progression and then using the Chord Track to swap out individual chords and reshape the harmony without re-recording anything. This is a fantastic tool for songwriters, especially if you’re trying to find the perfect progression without committing too soon.

However, Studio One Prime doesn’t support third-party VST plugins, so I used only the built-in instruments and effects. While the included tools were solid, not being able to load my favorite synths and mixing plugins was a major drawback. The free version also lacks automation, meaning I couldn’t create volume fades, filter sweeps, or evolving effects over time. This made mixing feel more limited.

That said, Studio One Prime is easily one of the best free tools for songwriters and producers who want a clean, intuitive interface with powerful arranging tools. It’s fast, responsive, and doesn’t feel like a downgraded trial version.

What I like about Studio One:

  • Multi-track recording and arrangement tools felt professional. Studio One didn’t feel like a “lite” version. I could easily record multiple takes and layer tracks, making it a great free tool for vocal and instrumental needs.
  • Pattern Mode made MIDI sequencing feel expressive. Instead of simply clicking in MIDI notes, I could build step-based patterns with dynamic velocity curves and controlled randomness. This was perfect for creating drum grooves and basslines that didn’t feel robotic.

What G2 users like about Studio One:

“What I love most about Studio One is that it has everything you would need to write, record, and produce a professional audio track, all contained in itself without having to go looking for outside plug-ins or software. Most people will look for those things, but you don't have to. There are plenty of virtual instruments and plug-in effects to make incredible music without anything else.”

 

- Studio One Review, Josh S.

What I dislike about Studio One:
  • No automation makes mixing more restrictive. I couldn’t create volume fades, automate filter sweeps, or gradually adjust effect parameters over time. This made certain aspects of production feel less dynamic.
  • There is no third-party VST support. I couldn’t load any of my external synths, samplers, or effects, meaning I was stuck using only the built-in tools. This was frustrating because it limited its long-term usability.
What G2 users dislike about Studio One:

“There are several things that can feel a bit like a gimmick. The Scratch Pad sounds like a good idea, but unless you have a large monitor, this becomes awkward to use, and if you open a few by accident, closing them is laborious and disrupts your workflow.”

- Studio One Review, Jamie M.

8. Avid Pro Tools

Avid Pro Tools is one of the most widely used DAWs in professional recording studios, so I wanted to see how much of that industry-level functionality made it into the free version, Pro Tools Intro.

Unlike some other free tools that feel like watered-down demos, this one stays true to Pro Tools’ structured, studio-focused workflow. Its limitations make it better suited for recording and mixing rather than full-scale music production.

Avid Pro Tools

I recorded a few vocal and guitar takes, and the built-in track comping tools made it easy to combine the best parts of each performance. Unlike free tools that require manual slicing and arrangement, Pro Tools handled this smoothly, letting me cycle through takes and edit with precision.

Another highlight was clip-based editing. I could adjust gain levels, fade in and out, and apply real-time clip effects without touching a separate plugin window. This was useful when working with dialogue and vocals. I could quickly adjust individual clips instead of automating entire tracks. I also tested group editing, which allowed me to simultaneously link and edit multiple tracks. This saved time when working with layered recordings, ensuring they aligned perfectly.

One of the most interesting free features was Elastic Audio, which let me adjust the timing of recorded performances without cutting and moving individual notes. I tested this on a live guitar recording and could stretch and shift notes into perfect time without making the audio sound unnatural. This was a huge plus for fixing small mistakes without re-recording an entire take.

The built-in Hybrid synth was another feature that caught my attention. While Pro Tools isn’t known for its virtual instruments, Hybrid gave me access to various evolving textures, pads, and electronic sounds. The interface was simple enough for quick sound design but still had deep control over modulation and filters. While not as expansive as third-party synths, it was useful for adding atmospheric layers to a track.

Where Pro Tools Intro started to feel limiting was in the overall track count. With only 8 audio tracks, 8 instrument tracks, and 4 aux tracks, I ran out of space quickly when trying to build a full song. There was also no support for third-party plugins, meaning I couldn’t load any external effects or instruments beyond what Avid provided. While the stock tools were well-designed, being locked into a fixed set of sounds made production feel restrictive.

Another thing to note is that Pro Tools Intro requires an Avid account and software activation before you can even start using it. Where you download and start producing immediately, this one requires going through a licensing setup, which might be frustrating if you just want to test it quickly.

What I like about Avid Pro Tools:

  • Clip-based editing tools made adjustments fast and precise. Instead of relying on automation or plugin settings, I could apply fades, gain adjustments, and real-time effects directly to individual clips. This saved time, especially when working with vocals.
  • Elastic Audio provided a flexible way to adjust timing. I tested this by shifting the rhythm of a live guitar recording, and it corrected timing issues without introducing weird artifacts or stretching glitches. It was a huge help in tightening up live performances.

What G2 users like about Avid Pro Tools:

“The thing that I like the most about pro tools is that it is very flexible. It can be used for recording, mixing, mastering, and production. It also is very similar to how analog consoles work. That really helps with understanding routing in an actual studio console. Plus, it's the industry standard, so it's used everywhere. Pro Tools offers a lot of useful editing shortcuts that help you with podcast editing, sync dubbing, sound design, etc.”

 

- Avid Pro Tools Review, Soham S.

What I dislike about Avid Pro Tools:
  • The workflow is built for engineers and studio recording, meaning there’s a learning curve if you’re new. The layout might be overwhelming if you're just starting with music production.
  • I couldn’t load any of my usual VST instruments or effects, limiting me to Avid’s stock sounds and processing tools. This was especially frustrating since Pro Tools is known for high-end mixing, but I couldn’t use my favorite third-party mixing plugins.
What G2 users dislike about Avid Pro Tools:

“I don't like the fact that there is no support for VST instruments and effects natively since not all plugins on the market are in the AAX format, which is the only one currently supported by pro tools. In addition, the audio engine sometimes crashes when editing audio clips or using beat detective.”

- Avid Pro Tools Review, Alejandro A.

9. Soundtrap

Soundtrap is entirely browser-based, meaning I didn’t have to download or install anything to start making music. 

That alone makes it one of the easiest ways to start making music for free, whether you’re on a laptop, tablet, or even a phone. But what really sets Soundtrap apart isn’t just its accessibility; it’s how it blends music creation with social interaction, making it one of the only free music making software designed for collaboration from the ground up.

Soundtrap

Since Soundtrap is cloud-based, my projects were automatically saved, and I could switch between devices without losing progress. This was incredibly convenient compared to traditional DAWs, where manually saving, exporting, and transferring files is the norm. Logging in and accessing my session from any device meant I never felt locked into one workspace.

One of the most unique features I found was the built-in chat and comment system, which let me communicate with collaborators directly. I tested this by sending notes on specific tracks, and my collaborator could see them instantly and make edits in real time. 

The built-in automation tools were another pleasant surprise. While many free tools strip away automation capabilities, Soundtrap lets me create fades, adjust filter sweeps, and automate effects directly in the timeline. This gave me more creative control over transitions and dynamics than I expected from a browser-based tool.

Regarding effects, I found the vocal tuning and amp modeling particularly useful. I ran a guitar through the amp presets, and while they weren’t as detailed as dedicated amp sims, they added enough character to be useful for quick demos or idea sketching. The vocal effects chain also gave me more control over EQ, compression, and reverb than expected, making it a great option for singers who want to experiment with vocal processing without external plugins.

The free version had some noticeable restrictions, though. Certain higher-quality effects, multi-band processing, and advanced sound libraries were locked behind a paywall. I also noticed that latency could be an issue depending on my internet speed. 

Despite its limitations, Soundtrap stands out for its accessibility, collaboration tools, and ability to make music without specialized equipment. 

What I like about Soundtrap:

  • Browser-based production without downloads or installations. I could start producing instantly from any device, and my projects were saved in the cloud automatically. Switching between my laptop and tablet felt effortless.
  • Built-in chat and commenting for easy collaboration. I left notes on specific tracks and communicated with collaborators directly, eliminating the need for external messaging apps. This made working on group projects more streamlined than in any other free solutions.

What G2 users like about Soundtrap:

“Soundtrap has creative tools and features that empower everyone to create professional music online without any advanced equipment. The studio space is rich in tracks, beats, and effects. It allows for importing files and sharing music with colleagues for collaboration and feedback.”

 

- Sountrap Review, Hany I.

What I dislike about Soundtrap:
  • There is no offline mode. If I lose internet access, I cannot continue working on my project, which makes it less reliable for producing on the go without a stable connection.
  • There are latency issues when recording live instruments. Since it runs in a browser, there was a noticeable delay when I tracked live vocals and instruments, making it less ideal for recording-heavy projects.
What G2 users dislike about Soundtrap:

“I have had issues with Soundtrap using a lot of memory on my internet web browser. Sometimes, it takes a long time to load, save, and merge tracks, resulting in the audio disappearing altogether. Luckily, the previous version's feature allows you to return to a previously saved version before all was lost.”

- Soundtrap Review, Sam R.

Click to chat with G2s Monty-AI

Frequently asked questions about the best free music making software

Have more questions? Find more answers below.

1. Can I make my own music for free?

Yes, free music making software allows you to record, mix, and produce full tracks without spending anything. Many programs come with built-in virtual instruments, effects, and sound libraries that let you compose songs from scratch. While free software often has limitations like track count restrictions or missing automation features, it can still produce high-quality music.

2. What is the best free software to create music?

The best free music making software depends on your workflow and what kind of music you want to create. Pro Tools Intro and Studio One Prime offer solid multi-track recording and editing tools if you're focused on recording instruments and vocals. If you’re more into beat-making and electronic music, FL Studio’s free version and Soundtrap provide fast sequencing and loop-based production. Sound Forge and Audacity are great choices for those needing audio editing rather than full song production.

3. What is the best free music making software for beginners?

If you’re just starting out, GarageBand (Mac only) is one of the easiest programs to use, thanks to its intuitive interface and built-in sound library. If you want something more flexible, Studio One Prime offers a beginner-friendly workflow with professional-grade recording and mixing tools. Soundtrap and FL Studio’s free versions are great options for those interested in electronic music and loop-based production.

4. What’s the difference between free and paid music making software?

Free versions often have track count limits, missing export options, or restricted access to third-party plugins. Some, like FL Studio’s free version, don’t let you reopen saved projects. Others, like Ableton Live Lite, cap the number of tracks and effects you can use. Paid software generally offers more instruments, automation controls, advanced mixing tools, and unlimited track counts. That said, many free programs are powerful enough to create professional-quality music.

5. Can I use third-party plugins with free music making software?

It depends on the program. Some free versions, like FL Studio’s free edition, don’t allow external plugins at all, while others support third-party VSTs and effects. If customizing your sound with external plugins is important, check whether the software allows VST or AU integration before downloading.

6. Do I need an audio interface to use free music making software?

No, but it helps. Most free software works with your computer’s built-in microphone and speakers, but an audio interface improves recording quality, reduces latency, and allows for better sound monitoring. An interface will significantly improve your results if you plan to record vocals or instruments.

Mix, master, and make it happen

After testing several free music making software, I can confidently say you don’t need to spend a fortune to start making music. Whether you’re here to lay down beats, record live instruments, or see if music production is your thing, a free tool does the job. Knowing which one fits your music making style is the trick because no software gives you everything for free.

Some of these tools are great for getting ideas down fast, others are built for deep editing and sound shaping, and a few are perfect for remote collaboration. What you choose depends on what matters most to you. Do you want easy access to loops and pre-made sounds? Are you planning to record vocals? Do you need real-time effects or automation? Once you figure out what’s essential, picking the right software becomes much easier.

Here’s the part where most people get stuck: waiting for the “perfect” tool before actually making music. Don’t do that. Pick one, open it, mess around with sounds, and see what happens. You’ll learn more in an hour of experimenting than you will reading about features. And if you hit a limitation? That means you’re pushing your creativity.

So download something, make a track, break things, undo, and try again. Free software isn’t just a stepping stone; it’s a legit way to create music that sounds good. 

Great music starts with great resources. Check out our list of the best royalty-free music sites for inspiration and high-quality sounds.


Get this exclusive AI content editing guide.

By downloading this guide, you are also subscribing to the weekly G2 Tea newsletter to receive marketing news and trends. You can learn more about G2's privacy policy here.