I Explored the 6 Best PLM Solutions Leading the Market Right Now

While unboxing a new shampoo tailored specifically for Indian hair types, I couldn't help but marvel at the thought and precision of its creation, from the ingredients to the packaging and even the marketing. It made me realize that bringing such a product to market isn’t easy. It requires careful planning, coordination, and an efficient process.

So, how do companies, especially those handling complex products, manage the intricacies of development and production? The answer lies in the best product lifecycle management (PLM) software.

I discovered how these systems help businesses streamline product development from ideation to launch by evaluating the top PLM tools. They centralize documents, track progress, and enable seamless team collaboration, ensuring every stage is meticulously managed and optimized.

Whether you're looking for the most reliable PLM software providers or the best user-friendly PLM software with great reviews, keep reading to kickstart a product-led business and improve processes in your existing product development strategy.

My top 6 PLM software recommendations for 2025

The best PLM software is designed to help businesses streamline product development, enhance cross-team collaboration, and accelerate time to market. The global product lifecycle management market size is projected to grow from USD 26.24 billion in 2024 to USD 46.81 billion by 2032.

As I evaluated these tools, I saw firsthand how they centralize product data, improve design workflows, and ensure greater transparency throughout the entire product journey.

What makes PLM software worth it: My opinion

• Allow users to create and manage product configurations and bill of materials (BOM)
• Deliver features for requirements tracking and engineering change management
• Provide a centralized repository to manage product data throughout its lifecycle
• Maintain product documentation, CAD models, drawings, and technical specifications
• Manage product costs by tracking the costs of the components defined in BOMs and recipes
• Comply with quality standards and regulations or with customer-specific requirements
• Include simulation features to manage product testing scenarios in virtual environments
• Facilitate collaboration with suppliers, subcontractors, and other stakeholders
• Assist manufacturers with process planning across multiple locations
• Analyze product development KPIs and monitor engineering performance

This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews have been edited for clarity.

1. Siemens Teamcenter: Best for seamless data and workflow integration

Siemens Teamcenter stands out as a comprehensive product lifecycle management (PLM) solution, and is one of the leading PLM software for large scale manufacturers. Reviewers often describe it as a reliable tool for centralizing and managing product-related data, though it does have a few usability challenges. G2 Data shows it’s heavily adopted by mid-market (31%) and enterprise (51%) companies and is a highly recommended PLM system for aerospace suppliers and industrial engineering.

One feature I see getting much praise is Teamcenter’s ability to manage, store, and retrieve product data. G2 reviewers frequently highlight how it eliminates the need for scattered spreadsheets and disconnected storage systems. Once implemented, users say it becomes a single source of truth that enhances data visibility and streamlines design and documentation workflows across teams.

There’s much love for how this tool handles real-time collaboration across departments. Many users appreciate how it enables engineering, design, and manufacturing teams to work simultaneously, regardless of geography. From what I’ve read, this seamless collaboration reduces delays, prevents miscommunication, and supports faster product development cycles.

A commonly appreciated element is Teamcenter’s customer support. I’ve come across several reviewers who mention prompt, 24/7 assistance and helpful troubleshooting support, particularly during the onboarding and system configuration phases. This strong support presence seems to help offset some of the complexity users encounter when adopting the platform.

Another strength mentioned in reviews is version control and product integration tracking. G2 users often note that the platform makes monitoring revisions and product iterations easy over time. This visibility helps teams ensure traceability and compliance, which are key needs for organizations with rigorous quality assurance requirements.

That said, several G2 reviewers mentioned that the implementation process can be resource-intensive. Configuring Teamcenter to align with existing workflows and training new users sometimes requires extra time and planning. Once teams get past that initial stage, though, many noted that the system’s long-term value makes the effort worthwhile.

Performance with large datasets was another area highlighted in reviews. A few users observed slower speeds when handling very large design files or extensive historical data. While it didn’t prevent them from completing tasks, it was something they had to account for when managing highly data-intensive projects.

What I dislike about Siemens Teamcenter:

• I’ve come across feedback where G2 users struggle with the complexity of implementation and mention that onboarding can be time-consuming, especially for teams new to PLM tools.
• I’ve noticed G2 reviewers frequently mention slow performance when working with large datasets or complex design files, which impacts productivity.

What G2 users dislike about Siemens Teamcenter:

"If you have large workflows, the interface can be quite slow in updating and displaying information. The query builder is also limited in how complex you can make the search criteria. Since moving to Active Workspace, support expertise seems lacking, and resolving issues takes longer."

- Siemens Teamcenter Review, Brian H.

2. Arena PLM & QMS: Best for lifecycle and quality management

Arena PLM & QMS is widely regarded as a well-structured platform for managing product lifecycle and quality management processes. G2 Data shows that 60% of its customers come from mid-market companies, with strong adoption in industries like medical devices, electrical/electronic manufacturing, and consumer electronics.

Users particularly appreciate its ability to streamline operations across multiple departments, making it a good choice for teams looking to integrate their workflows. However, G2 reviewers also mention a few areas where the platform could improve in terms of flexibility and user experience.

One feature that I see getting a lot of praise is Arena's responsive customer support. Many G2 users highlight the quality of technical assistance, often mentioning how quickly the support team responds and how knowledgeable they are in resolving issues. This high level of service seems to ease the learning curve and help users effectively navigate the platform, especially during the initial setup phase.

Something G2 reviewers seem to really appreciate is the platform's flexibility and customization. Multiple users emphasize how Arena allows them to build workflows that match their specific business needs. Whether it's creating approval chains or designing task flows, reviewers consistently note how customizable the system is, making it adaptable to both compliance and operational changes.

One standout capability, according to users, is Arena's modular structure, which organizes workflows into different “worlds” such as Requests, Items, Quality, and Training. This segmentation is frequently praised by reviewers for its simplicity and clarity, as it helps users focus on specific tasks without feeling overwhelmed by unrelated information. Reviewers also appreciate how each "world" includes relevant tools and workflows, making it easy to navigate and use.

Another area where Arena gets high marks is its analytics capabilities. G2 users often mention how easy it is to track key metrics and create dashboards, enabling real-time project monitoring. This visibility allows teams to identify bottlenecks early and make data-driven decisions, keeping projects on track and teams aligned.

That said, reviewers did mention some room for improvement in data management. A few pointed out that once items are entered into the production environment, they cannot be deleted or removed. While this ensures strong data integrity, users noted that it can lead to a cluttered workspace over time. Suggestions for features like a “Trash” or holding area were common as a way to add more flexibility.

Some feedback also touched on import and bulk-edit features. While these functions are available, several G2 users said they could feel a bit less intuitive than expected, particularly when handling large datasets. It didn’t stop them from getting the job done, but they mentioned it sometimes required extra steps or workarounds.

What I dislike about Arena PLM & QMS:

• I’ve noticed multiple G2 users express dissatisfaction with Arena’s inability to remove items from the production environment, leading to a cluttered workspace over time.
• I’ve come across feedback where G2 users mention that the import and multi-edit features can be unintuitive, making large data management tasks more time-consuming.

What G2 users dislike about Arena PLM & QMS:

- Arena PLM & QMS Review, Josefine R.

3. OpenBOM: Best for cloud-based BOM management

OpenBOM is frequently praised for its ease of use and modern design, making it one of the top providers of best product lifecycle management for a small engineering firm that needs to manage parts, assemblies, and inventory efficiently. This is highlighted in G2 Data because 78% of its users are from small businesses, mainly in industries like mechanical or industrial engineering, electrical/electronic manufacturing, and automotive.

Many users highlight how simple and intuitive the system is, particularly when it comes to organizing and updating bills of materials (BOM). G2 reviewers often mention how quickly they were able to get started without extensive training, appreciating the streamlined navigation that enables them to update part lists with minimal hassle.

A standout feature that I’ve noticed getting frequent positive mentions from G2 users is the ability to attach images to items. This addition is widely praised for improving part identification, as users can quickly reference images instead of relying solely on part numbers or names. This feature, while simple, significantly enhances efficiency for many users, saving time and reducing errors when locating specific parts.

I’ve read multiple reviewers mention how well OpenBOM handles basic inventory management — tracking parts, quantities, and assemblies — all while providing a sleek, cloud-based interface. G2 users appreciate the accessibility it offers, enabling teams in different locations to stay updated in real time. This seems particularly beneficial for smaller businesses that don't require the complexity of a full ERP system.

However, workflow guidance is an area where users saw room for improvement. Several G2 reviewers mentioned that while OpenBOM automates tasks like filling in component quantities, it can be less flexible in scenarios like partial shipments. The extra manual adjustments required in such cases added to their workload, though most still found the system far more efficient than spreadsheets.

Performance with large files was another recurring theme in reviews. Users noted that integrations with CAD software like SolidWorks could slow down or occasionally crash when handling very complex assemblies. A few also mentioned missing STEP or drawing files during transfers. While these issues didn’t make the tool unusable, they did require workarounds or extra time to ensure files were properly managed.

What I dislike about OpenBOM:

• G2 reviews showed challenges with OpenBOM’s lack of high-level workflows, especially around production planning and purchase orders. This leads to inefficient manual adjustments when parts arrive in incomplete shipments.
• I’ve seen several G2 reviewers express dissatisfaction with OpenBOM’s performance when handling large files, especially during integration with Solidworks. The system crashes or fails to transfer complex files properly, disrupting workflows and requiring users to retry.

What G2 users dislike about OpenBOM:

- OpenBOM Review, Josh K.

4. Onshape: Best for real-time CAD and PLM collaboration

Onshape is often described as a modern, cloud-based CAD platform that brings many benefits, especially for collaborative design. According to G2 Data, 61% of its users are small businesses and 39% mid-market, primarily in industries like design, industrial automation, and mechanical engineering.

A common theme in reviews is its cloud-based architecture and modern interface, which many G2 users highlight as a significant advantage. Users appreciate that it eliminates the need for heavy software installations and file version conflicts, making it easy to access and work on designs from anywhere. The platform's ability to provide a collaborative environment where teams can work in real-time is frequently praised, as it simplifies sharing and editing designs.

From what I’ve seen, one feature that consistently stands out in G2 reviews is Onshape's built-in version and change control system. Many users express appreciation for this core functionality, which eliminates the need for separate PDM systems and manual backups. The automatic tracking of every edit, branch, and merge seems to improve collaboration, reduce errors, and enhance the overall user experience. It also helps streamline product development, especially when integrated with Arena, PTC’s product lifecycle management system.

A notable strength that G2 users regularly mention is Onshape's frequent updates. Reviewers often highlight the platform’s quick evolution, with significant updates delivered every few weeks. Users seem to appreciate that these updates are not just bug fixes but often introduce new features that improve modeling, usability, and performance. This consistent stream of improvements contributes to Onshape’s reputation as a cutting-edge tool in the CAD space.

However, I’ve also noticed that G2 reviewers sometimes mention limitations in sheet metal modeling and documentation. Compared to more mature CAD platforms, some users feel that Onshape lacks the advanced features required for handling complex sheet metal projects. As a result, many users have mentioned using workarounds or exporting designs to other tools for final processing, which disrupts their workflows.

In addition, several G2 users have expressed frustration with applying partial surface details like labels, stickers, or logos within assemblies. Reviews point out that there’s no straightforward way to place these details directly on partial surfaces. Users often have to resort to imprints or the Render Studio, which may not be ideal for quick visualizations. This limitation has left some users wishing for more flexible options, especially when working on presentations or visual demos for stakeholders.

What I dislike about Onshape:

• I’ve seen G2 users express frustration with Onshape’s limitations in sheet metal modeling, often relying on workarounds or exporting designs to other tools for processing.
• I’ve come across G2 feedback indicating that applying partial surface details like logos or stickers in assemblies is cumbersome, with no direct method for placing them on partial surfaces.

What G2 users dislike about Onshape:

- Onshape Review, Russell W.

5. Propel: Best for Salesforce-native PLM

However, I’ve noticed that some users on G2 express frustration with auditability, particularly around file deletions. Many reviewers mention the lack of an audit trail when files are deleted, which creates a gap in accountability. Users, especially those inheriting systems, have emphasized the importance of tracking who deleted files and when, as this is critical in maintaining documentation integrity. This seems to be a recurring issue for those in industries where detailed records are essential.

Another point that comes up in reviews is email notification control. While Propel offers automation for certain processes, multiple G2 reviewers have noted the lack of customization options for email notifications. Users frequently mention that they are unable to adjust the content of notifications or add external recipients, which can lead to important updates not reaching the right people in the right format. This is often seen as an area that needs improvement to enhance communication across teams.

From what I’ve seen in G2 reviews, there’s also some feedback regarding the platform's learning curve. While Propel is known for its flexibility, many users point out that it can be overwhelming for those who are new to the system. Users need a deeper understanding of its structure to fully take advantage of its customization options, which can require significant time and effort. This steep learning curve is often cited by users as a barrier, particularly when it comes to customizing the front-end interface.

What I dislike about Propel:

• I’ve seen some G2 reviewers express frustration with the lack of an audit trail for file deletions, which they feel compromises accountability and documentation integrity.
• From what I’ve read, several users mention that Propel’s email notification control is limited, as customization options for notification content and external recipients are not available, affecting team communication.

What G2 users dislike about Propel:

"New users would benefit from complete onboarding materials because the learning process requires substantial effort. The customer support team responds slowly to requests during times of high volume operations, which creates frustration for users with urgent problems. The mobile application also requires better functionality along with an enhanced user experience."

- Propel Review, Mark H.

6. Duro: Best for fast, cloud-native PLM setup

Duro is frequently described as a lightweight, easy-to-use PLM tool that simplifies the process of scaling engineering operations. Many users appreciate its user-friendly interface, which doesn’t overwhelm with unnecessary features. This makes it an ideal choice for organizations just beginning to implement product lifecycle management systems, which is reflected in its usage, with 71% of users coming from small businesses, according to G2 Data. Reviewers often highlight how the platform’s simplicity and ease of use make it accessible without a steep learning curve.

One feature that G2 reviewers seem to really appreciate is Duro’s MPN auto-match feature for electronic engineering items. Users consistently call out this automation as a major time-saver, particularly for large parts inventories. The feature automatically matches manufacturer part numbers with corresponding items in the system, reducing manual searches and improving accuracy. This function is often praised for allowing teams to focus on more strategic tasks rather than getting bogged down by repetitive data entry.

Another commonly appreciated element, according to feedback I gathered from G2 users, is the integration transparency included in the enterprise plan. Unlike many other PLM tools that charge extra for integrations or leave users to figure out how to connect different software tools, Duro includes these integrations as part of the plan. G2 reviewers often mention how this transparency eliminates the hassle of hidden costs or complicated integrations, making it easier to streamline workflows across systems.

However, G2 users also point out some areas where Duro could improve. One recurring issue is the lack of currency conversion options. According to multiple reviewers, the platform only supports pricing in USD, which can lead to inaccuracies when managing costs for international products. For global organizations dealing with suppliers and customers in different currencies, having the option to convert and select different currencies would be a significant improvement.

I’ve also seen some users express frustration with interface quirks, such as material labels being obscured despite available page space. While not a dealbreaker, several G2 reviewers have mentioned that this small issue caused occasional confusion when trying to access specific material information quickly.

Finally, a limitation that G2 users often mention is the absence of an import feature for vendor mechanical parts. Reviewers point out that this adds manual work when entering data for mechanical parts, especially when importing directly from suppliers. Many suggest that having this feature would streamline workflows and improve efficiency across different parts categories.

What I dislike about Duro:

• I’ve seen G2 feedback about the lack of currency conversion options, which limits global organizations dealing with multiple currencies.
• I’ve come across G2 users mentioning frustration with interface quirks, such as material labels being obscured, which can cause confusion during quick access.

What G2 users dislike about Duro:

"Some cons include occasional authentication issues with the Onshape plugin, and the features that would distinguish Duro as a true PLM product (as opposed to just PDM) do not yet seem mature enough to merit their use. I would love to one day use Duro to manage builds, component inventories, and more — it will be interesting to see how their product evolves in the future."

- Duro Review, Tyler B.

PLM software: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Got more questions? We have the answers.

1. Which PLM software is ideal for large enterprises?

Siemens Teamcenter is popular among large enterprises for its scalability, advanced integration capabilities, robust collaboration tools, and support for complex product structures.

2. Which is the best PLM software for small businesses or startups?

OpenBOM offers affordable, cloud-native PLM solutions designed for small to mid-sized companies. This includes essential product data management and collaboration features without the heavy complexity.

3. Can PLM software integrate with CAD and ERP systems?

Yes. Most modern PLM solutions offer seamless integration with CAD tools like SolidWorks, AutoCAD, and CATIA, as well as ERP systems like SAP and Oracle to ensure smooth data flow across product development and business operations.

4. What is the difference between PDM and PLM software?

Product data management (PDM) focuses mainly on managing CAD files and technical documentation, while product lifecycle management (PLM) covers the entire lifecycle of a product, from concept and design to manufacturing, service, and disposal.

5. Is cloud-based PLM better than on-premises PLM?

Cloud-based PLM offers advantages like easier updates, lower upfront costs, faster deployment, and accessibility from anywhere. However, some companies with strict data control needs may prefer on-premises solutions.

6. What's the best PLM tool for tech startups?

Onshape and Duro are great options for tech startups. Onshape provides a cloud-native CAD and PLM platform that facilitates real-time collaboration on 3D models, making it ideal for fast-moving design teams. Duro is a lightweight, user-friendly PLM tool that simplifies engineering operations and offers a fast, cloud-native setup, which is perfect for startups just beginning to manage their product lifecycle.

7. Which PLM software is best for product design companies?

Onshape and OpenBOM are excellent for product design companies. Onshape's real-time collaboration on 3D CAD models and built-in version control streamline the design process. OpenBOM's user-friendly interface and simple BOM management, with the added ability to attach images to items, make it easy to organize and share design information.

8. What are the top PLM software options for the aerospace industry?

Siemens Teamcenter is a highly recommended PLM system for the aerospace industry. It has been strongly adopted by aerospace suppliers and industrial engineering firms. Its ability to unify product data, manage complex workflows, and track product integrations is essential for this highly regulated industry.

9. What is the leading PLM software for large-scale manufacturers?

Siemens Teamcenter is the leading PLM software for large-scale manufacturers, as it is heavily adopted by enterprises and mid-market companies (over 80% combined). It is well-suited for organizations handling complex product development due to its robust data management and seamless workflow integration.

10. Which PLM platform is best for innovation management?

Propel and Arena PLM & QMS are great choices for innovation management. Propel's integration with Salesforce enables customer-centric workflows, allowing companies to incorporate market feedback into the product lifecycle. Arena PLM & QMS, with its focus on lifecycle and quality management, helps ensure that new product ideas are developed with compliance and quality standards in mind.

11. Which PLM software is best for mobile device management?

Tools like Onshape are browser-based, which allows for work on mobile devices and eliminates the need for heavy software installations, though the functionality can be more limited compared to a desktop experience.

12. Which PLM software is best for a small engineering firm?

For a small engineering firm, Duro and OpenBOM are strong contenders. Duro is praised for its fast, cloud-native setup and user-friendly interface, which makes it easy to scale engineering operations. OpenBOM simplifies BOM creation and management with its cloud-based system, making it a perfect fit for a small firm that needs to efficiently manage parts and assemblies.

Precision down to a ‘T’

After thoroughly evaluating the best PLM software, I’ve come to appreciate how much the right system can streamline product development and lifecycle management.

Each platform offers unique features tailored to different needs, whether you’re focused on collaboration across teams, managing complex product data, or accelerating time-to-market. With so many options available, there’s always a solution that can help you manage your product lifecycle more efficiently.

I hope my insights help you find the best PLM software for your organization — because, let’s face it, managing products manually just slows innovation down!

Explore innovative 3D printing solutions that accelerate your prototyping, production, and product development processes.