Sinking Funds: Why They Matter for Investors and Issuers

October 13, 2025

sinking fund

In the world of corporate bonds, risk management is everything.

For investors, one of the biggest concerns is whether the issuer will actually repay its debt. For companies, maintaining a strong credit profile while managing debt obligations can make or break future fundraising efforts.

That’s where sinking funds come in.

A sinking fund provides added security for investors in a corporate bond issue. It significantly reduces the risk of default by setting aside funds to repay the bonds at maturity. In essence, the amount the company needs to pay at maturity is much smaller when a sinking fund is in place.

Companies use budgeting and forecasting software to estimate future revenue across operations, create budgets for departments, and understand where they should put their money. 

Sinking fund protection is a feature in some bonds that limits or modifies the issuer's ability to redeem bonds through a sinking fund mechanism. It benefits bondholders by restricting early redemption and protecting against unfavorable interest rates.

TL;DR: Everything you need to know about sinking funds

  • Why do companies use sinking funds? They reduce default risk, improve credit ratings, lower borrowing costs, and allow for more predictable debt management.
  • How do sinking funds work? Companies make periodic payments into a trustee-managed fund, which is used to retire bonds on a schedule or via open-market buybacks.
  • What are the benefits of sinking funds for investors? Sinking funds lower the risk of default, offer more predictable cash flow, and may improve bond liquidity, though they sometimes come with lower yields.
  • What are the risks of sinking funds? Investors may face early redemption risk and reinvestment risk. Redemption terms can also be complex and unpredictable.
  • How are sinking funds different from emergency funds or savings accounts? Unlike emergency or savings accounts, sinking funds are typically tied to formal debt obligations and structured repayment schedules.
  • What software supports budgeting and forecasting for sinking fund planning? Leading tools like IBM Planning Analytics, Vena, Planful, Ramp, and Anaplan help businesses forecast revenue, model scenarios, and manage contributions to sinking funds as part of broader financial planning.

What are the different types of sinking funds in corporate bonds?

Not all sinking funds are structured the same way. Depending on the bond agreement (known as the indenture), the sinking fund can be mandatory, optional, or tied to specific market conditions. Here are the main types companies may use when issuing corporate bonds

Type of sinking fund What it is How it’s used Example use case
Specific-purpose sinking fund Funds set aside for a defined project or goal Dedicated to repaying debt tied to a specific initiative Bonds issued to fund a new HQ; sinking fund used solely for that project
Regular payment sinking fund Systematic debt repayment over time Fixed contributions on a set schedule (e.g., quarterly) Company deposits funds yearly to retire bonds in tranches
Purchase back sinking fund Opportunistic bond buybacks Bonds repurchased from the open market, often below face value Firm buys back bonds at a discount during market downturn
Callable bond Early redemption of callable bonds Sinking fund used if the issuer “calls” bonds before maturity Issuer calls bonds early and pays bondholders using the sinking fund

What’s the difference between a sinking fund, an emergency fund, and a savings account?

Although they all involve setting aside money, a sinking fund, an emergency fund, and a savings account serve very different purposes in financial planning, particularly in corporate finance vs. personal finance. Here’s how they compare:

Feature Sinking fund Emergency fund Savings account
Primary purpose Gradually repay a specific debt (e.g., bond or loan) Cover unexpected expenses (e.g., job loss, medical emergency) Save for general short- or long-term financial goals
Use case Corporate debt repayment strategy Personal financial safety net Flexible savings, anything from a vacation to a down payment
Access to funds Restricted; managed by a trustee or tied to a debt instrument Fully liquid and quickly accessible Highly liquid, often accessible via ATM or online
Returns/interest Usually earns minimal or no interest May earn a small interest in a savings account Earns interest depending on the bank/product
Time horizon Medium to long-term, tied to bond/debt maturity schedule Short-term, for sudden emergencies Varies; short to long-term
Typical owner Businesses or municipalities Individuals or households Individuals, households, businesses
Is it legally required? Often included in bond indentures (contractually obligated for issuers) Not legally required, but highly recommended No, completely optional

What are the benefits of sinking funds for issuers and investors?

Sinking funds serve as a financial bridge between stability and strategy. For companies, they ease debt management and improve borrowing terms. For investors, they offer an added layer of protection and predictability. Below, we break down the key advantages for each side of the bond equation.

Benefits for issuers

These are the main advantages for an issuer:

  • Smoother debt management: Managing a large bond issue without a plan can create financial strain when maturity hits. A sinking fund spreads that liability out over time, allowing companies to chip away at the principal gradually.
  • Improved credit ratings: Credit rating agencies evaluate not just how much debt a company has, but how it plans to repay it. A sinking fund reflects discipline and forward planning, which often translates into higher credit ratings.
  • Debt reduction at a discount: In some structures, companies can use sinking fund contributions to repurchase bonds on the open market. If bond prices fall below par, the issuer can retire debt at a discount, effectively reducing the total repayment amount.
  • Signals financial responsibility: For public companies or firms in regulated industries (such as utilities), maintaining a sinking fund signals to boards, shareholders, and regulators that management is proactively managing debt. It shows foresight, not just financial compliance.

Benefits for investors

Below are the key benefits for an investor:

Lower risk of default: A predictable repayment schedule builds trust and makes the bond more attractive to conservative investors. When payments are made incrementally, there’s less pressure (and uncertainty) at the bond’s maturity date.

More predictable cash flows: Because many sinking funds retire a portion of the debt over time, investors may receive partial principal repayments during the bond’s life, not just at the end. This offers improved liquidity and more consistent cash flow.

Higher market appeal and liquidity: Bonds with sinking fund provisions often have broader appeal, especially to institutional investors and pension funds seeking structured debt vehicles. Greater demand can lead to higher bond prices and better resale liquidity in secondary markets.

Better risk-adjusted yield: Although bonds with sinking funds may offer slightly lower nominal yields than higher-risk options, they often present a better risk-adjusted return — especially during economic uncertainty.

Investors may accept a slightly lower coupon in exchange for the added protection of a sinking fund mechanism.

What are the risks and challenges of sinking funds in corporate bonds?

While sinking funds offer several advantages to both issuers and investors, they’re not without potential downsides. Depending on how the provision is structured, it can introduce uncertainty, reduced returns, and structural complexity.

Below are the most common risks and challenges to consider.

  • Early redemption risk: Bonds with sinking fund provisions may be redeemed before maturity, limiting the investor’s interest income and total return.
  • Reinvestment risk: Investors may have to reinvest redeemed principal at lower interest rates, especially during rate declines, reducing future income.
  • Bondholder uncertainty: Sinking fund redemptions can be random (via lottery) or partial (pro-rata), making it hard to plan around cash flow or investment horizon.
  • Lower yield compared to non-sinking bonds: Because they’re perceived as safer, bonds with sinking funds often offer slightly lower yields, especially in lower-risk credit tiers.
  • Issuer flexibility constraints: Mandatory contributions can tie up company capital, reducing flexibility in periods of cash strain and potentially leading to technical default if missed.

Top 5 budgeting and forecasting software

Companies need to plan effectively for future business activities and operations, and budgeting and forecasting software enable businesses to build a plan that supports their future business operations. G2 helps businesses find budgeting and forecasting software solutions that facilitate revenue and expense estimation, budget creation, and profitability oversight.

To qualify for inclusion in the budgeting and forecasting category, a product must:

  • Provide templates for different types of budgets
  • Allow users to create different versions of the same budget
  • Maintain budgeting history and use it to develop forecasts
  • Compare revenues and expense estimates with actuals
  • Consolidate budgets from several departments
  • Use what-if scenarios to forecast possible budget changes
  • Monitor the performance of budgeting processes

* Below are the top five leading budgeting and forecasting software platforms from G2’s Fall 2025 Grid® Report. Some reviews may be edited for clarity. 

1. Anaplan

Anaplan’s enterprise cloud software aligns businesses with their objectives and resources to drive better outcomes. Anaplan’s proprietary Hyperblock™ technology produces ultra-fast calculations, even for large datasets. This means businesses make quicker decisions as they navigate evolving marketing conditions and challenges. Organizations that use Anaplan can bring more key stakeholders into the decision-making process for better collaboration. 

What G2 users like best:

“Anaplan is a type of system that, if implemented successfully, sells itself inside the company. The more functions you get on the platform, the larger the benefit of having such a platform can be. It is very simple to integrate and synchronize different areas of Anaplan models with each other, like making your supply chain application deliver data automatically to your finance application by doing away with long email chains of finding the correct version of the plan to use.

It also extends to third-party sources. Anaplan supports easy integration possibilities with dedicated analytics tools or allows for simple integration with source systems. It's fast and reliable and does not need a lot of IT resources to set up.” 

- Anaplan review, Andris I. 

What G2 users dislike:

“Dashboard functionality is not as flexible as Excel. For example, the font size is not adjustable. Cell highlighting by the user is not possible. The line item alias is not there; we must create a separate line item to accommodate the reporting requirement.”

- Anaplan review, Ivan L. 

2. IBM Planning Analytics

IBM Planning Analytics is a powerful budgeting and forecasting platform built on TM1, designed to handle complex, enterprise-scale financial planning. It supports driver-based modeling, rolling forecasts, and real-time scenario analysis across departments. 

What G2 users like best:

“IBM Planning Analytics stands out for its impressive blend of flexibility and performance. The integration of TM1 with a user-friendly interface enables real-time data analysis and supports quicker decision-making. I also value how easily I can create dynamic dashboards and carry out multidimensional modeling. Its automation features greatly minimize manual work, which enhances both efficiency and accuracy across planning, forecasting, and reporting tasks.” 

- IBM Planning Analytics review, Nilesh P. 

What G2 users dislike:

“One thing I don't like about TM1 is the complexity involved in scaling models across different business units. While TM1 offers flexibility, maintaining consistency and performance across large, decentralized teams can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex, interdependent calculations and data sources.” 

- IBM Planning Analytics review, Vini K. 

3. Vena

Vena is a budgeting and forecasting solution that combines Excel’s interface with a centralized database, workflow automation, and version control. It supports integrated planning, rolling forecasts, and financial consolidation in a highly collaborative environment. 

What G2 users like best:

“As a financial analyst, part of the sales team, in my organisation, this Excel-based interface has made my processes easier and automated with strong collaboration. This Vena tool is extremely helpful for those who work in financial companies like myself, by coordinating enterprise finance teams like budgeting, forecasting, making it a more intuitive and easier process to work on.” 

- Vena review, Haripriya R. 

What G2 users dislike:

“On the other hand, some advanced features require a bit of time to master, and the price can be a barrier for small businesses. When the models become very large, the loading time can also increase.” 

- Vena review, Arthur C.

4. Mosaic Tech

Mosaic Tech is a strategic finance platform with real-time analytics data and planning capabilities that empower businesses to make decisions faster. Mosaic Tech automates data integrations, consolidates financial and operational data, refines financial processes to save time, and provides interactive modeling for cross-functional team alignment. Mosaic Tech aims to help businesses plan for the future through a strategic financial lens. 

What G2 users like best:

“The team at Mosaic Tech has built a truly practical SaaS software solution that allows us to integrate all our data sources needed to forecast the entirety of our SaaS business in one platform. Our ADP, Sage Intacct, and Salesforce instances were all successfully connected in about a week. Setting up our financial statements followed intuitive formatting and tying out processes. Our assigned integration team was very responsive in helping us establish our initial forecast model, which allowed us to leave our old spreadsheet models in the past.”

- Mosaic Tech review, Benjamin A. 

What G2 users dislike:

“Report formatting is somewhat rigid. I can’t export reports as PDFs and would also like to auto-schedule reports for email recipients. Additionally, models don't export to Excel intact, making it difficult to share with investors.”

- Mosaic Tech review, Craig H. 

5. Planful

Planful delivers continuous budgeting, forecasting, and financial planning in one platform. It enables users to run rolling forecasts, plan across multiple business units, and accelerate month-end reporting with real-time data integration and scenario modeling.

What G2 users like best:

“Planful provides a lot of flexibility. From reporting to planning, there are always multiple ways to do something, and Planful is almost always flexible enough to do it how you prefer. Reporting is great!”

- Planful review, Shane T. 

What G2 users dislike:

“Currently, Planful is not connected to our ERP system, which means we still need to manually upload a significant amount of data. This adds extra steps to our workflow and limits the potential for real-time updates. We’re hopeful that moving forward, we can establish a direct integration with our ERP system to streamline the process and fully leverage Planful’s automation capabilities.”

- Planful review, Veronica Y. 

Click to chat with G2's Monty-AI

Frequently asked questions about sinking fund

Got more questions? We have the answers.

Q1. Is a sinking fund the same as amortization?

No. While both involve repaying debt over time, amortization typically refers to scheduled principal and interest payments on loans, whereas a sinking fund is a separate reserve set aside specifically to gradually retire bonds or debt instruments.

Q2. Can a sinking fund be used to pay off loans or only bonds?

While most common in bond repayment, companies can also use sinking funds to retire other forms of long-term debt, including term loans or lease obligations.

Q3. Where is a sinking fund recorded on financial statements?

Sinking funds appear as non-current assets (or sometimes restricted cash) on the balance sheet, depending on how the funds are managed and when the obligation is due.

Q4. Do all corporate bonds have a sinking fund provision?

No. Sinking fund provisions are optional and vary by bond issue. High-risk or long-term bonds are more likely to include them to attract investors and reduce perceived credit risk.

Q5. Can a company change or cancel a sinking fund provision?

Not without bondholder approval. Sinking fund terms are contractually set in the bond indenture and cannot be unilaterally changed by the issuer once the bond is issued.

Set sail with a sinking fund

Sinking funds provide security to increase the safety of investing in a bond. However, no matter the precautions you’ve taken, there’s always a chance of a storm that can steer you off course. You can breathe a little easier knowing that your sinking fund is there to float you through any kind of weather.

Want to dive deeper into how companies finance business operations? Learn more about capital structure.

This article was originally published in 2024. It has been updated with new information.


Get this exclusive AI content editing guide.

By downloading this guide, you are also subscribing to the weekly G2 Tea newsletter to receive marketing news and trends. You can learn more about G2's privacy policy here.