Nice to meet you.

Enter your email to receive our weekly G2 Tea newsletter with the hottest marketing news, trends, and expert opinions.

I Tried 8 Best Video Conferencing Software: Who Wins?

January 21, 2025

best video conferencing software

It all started with a single, painfully awkward meeting.

You know the kind I’m talking about—half the attendees couldn’t join because the link didn’t work, someone’s audio kept cutting out, and the screen share? Let’s just say it wasn’t sharing much. That day, I found myself thinking: there’s got to be a better way.

We all want the same thing from video conferencing: crystal clear audio, smooth video, and features that don’t make us feel like we’re wrestling with technology mid-meeting.

As someone who spends most of their day bouncing between virtual meetings—team check-ins, presentations, and even the occasional brainstorming sessions—I realized I’d been settling for “good enough” video conferencing tools

I decided it was time for a change. 

I started testing some of the best video conferencing software on G2, from the heavyweights everyone knows to the underdogs flying under the radar. Each tool had its own personality. Some were sleek and sophisticated, built for large-scale corporate meetings. Others were lightweight and user-friendly, perfect for small teams or casual chats. And anything else? It never made the cut.

Whether you’re here because you’re frustrated with your current setup or you’re simply curious to see what else is out there, you’re in the right place. I’ve done the hard work, so you don’t have to. Let’s explore the best video conferencing tools and find the one to make your next meeting seamless, productive, and maybe even fun.

8 best video conferencing software I tested (and loved)

When I first started exploring video conferencing services, I thought it was just a fancy way to make video calls. But the more I used these tools, the more I realized they’re so much more than that. The best video conferencing software and platforms are designed to bridge the gap between people, no matter where they are, by creating a virtual space for communication and collaboration.

For me, it’s like having a digital meeting room in my pocket—one that lets me not only see and hear others but also work together in real time. It’s where ideas are shared, decisions are made, and relationships are built, whether you’re running a business meeting, teaching a class, or just catching up with loved ones.

But here’s the thing: the best video conferencing software doesn’t just connect you; it makes the experience effortless and enjoyable. That’s what sets a truly great platform apart. It’s not just about video and audio—it’s about how well it supports how we interact, collaborate, and get things done.

How did I find and evaluate the best video conferencing software?

I used G2’s grid reports to identify the leaders in the video conferencing domain. Then, I put the most talked-about tools to the test myself. I hosted team meetings, ran virtual workshops, scheduled client presentations, and even organized casual online hangouts to see how these platforms handled different scenarios.

 

I evaluated everything from ease of setup to advanced features like screen sharing, breakout rooms, and collaboration tools. Performance was a huge factor, too—after all, a tool is only as good as its ability to deliver glitch-free calls under real-world conditions.

 

I also tapped into user feedback at scale. I used AI to analyze hundreds of reviews on G2, which helped me spot recurring themes—both positive and negative—that I might not have encountered in my testing alone. 

What makes the best video conferencing software? My checklist

When I set out to find the best video conferencing software, I realized it wasn’t just about ticking boxes on a feature list. The best tools excel in several key areas that directly impact how we communicate and collaborate online. Here’s what I looked for and why each factor matters.

  • Collaboration: Beyond basic screen sharing, I looked for tools that offered breakout rooms, real-time whiteboards, and live polls to enhance interaction. Features like live transcription, closed captions, and translation tools were great to have, especially when collaborating with international teams. I was particularly impressed by platforms integrated with productivity apps, allowing me to share files, manage tasks, or co-edit documents directly within the meeting.
  • Scalability and flexibility: Whether it’s a casual one-on-one or a webinar with thousands of participants, the software needs to scale. Customizable meeting layouts, participant management options, and compatibility with different devices—from mobile phones to an entire conference room systems—proved invaluable. Platforms that could grow with my needs, offering flexible upgrades and add-ons, scored extra points.
  • Ease of use: A tool can have all the features in the world, but if it’s confusing to use, it’s not worth it. One-click access through shared links, browser-based options (no downloads required), and seamless integration with tools like Google Calendar or Outlook made a huge difference. I found that intuitive layouts, clean menus, and clear instructions were essential for keeping things stress-free.
  • Reliability: I tested these tools on everything from fast office Wi-Fi to less reliable coffee shop connections. The best platforms consistently delivered clear audio and smooth video, even when bandwidth was limited. Many use an adaptive streaming technology that adjusts video quality in real time to avoid lag or glitches. I also appreciated platforms with quick recovery systems for dropped calls, ensuring minimal disruption.
  • Privacy and security: Security isn’t just a bonus—it’s a necessity. I looked for platforms prioritizing user safety with features like end-to-end encryption, meeting passwords, and waiting rooms to control who gets in. As someone who sometimes handles sensitive discussions, I feel these security measures provide peace of mind.
  • Value for money: Price matters, but it’s not just about how much a tool costs—it’s about what you get for your money. I found that several free tiers offered impressive functionality, including unlimited calls and essential collaboration tools. However, paid plans delivered more advanced features like analytics, admin controls, and higher participant limits, which were worth the investment for larger teams or complex projects. 

After testing 20+ solutions against these factors, I finally have my top 8 video conferencing tools that stood out as robust, reliable, and scalable.

The list below contains genuine user reviews from the best video conferencing software category page. To be included in this category, a solution must:

  • Provide online video and audio communication between two or more parties
  • Allow video conference hosts to modify specifications and invite guests to meetings
  • Offer features like screen sharing and chat within individual conferences
  • Offer recording capabilities for future references or presentations

*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.  

1. Google Meet

Google Meet is one of those video conferencing tools that quietly gets the job done without extra fluff. I’ve used it for everything from client calls to casual catch-ups with colleagues, and what stood out to me the most was how effortlessly it integrates into my daily workflow. 

Since it’s part of the Google Workspace ecosystem, scheduling a meeting is as easy as sending a calendar invite—no separate apps, no extra downloads, just a simple link that pops right into my inbox or Google Calendar. It’s almost too convenient.

Google Meet-1

Source

I spent quite a bit of time testing Google Meet in different scenarios—team brainstorms, virtual workshops, and even a few large webinars. The video and audio quality remained pretty solid throughout, even when I had multiple participants with varying internet speeds. 

I particularly liked the live captioning feature, which transcribes conversations in real time. It's not only surprisingly accurate but also super helpful when dealing with accents or background noise. Speaking of noise, Meet’s AI-powered noise cancellation did an impressive job of cutting out distractions—goodbye, construction noise and barking dogs!

Another cool thing I discovered is how well it integrates with other Google apps. I could share Google Docs, Sheets, or Slides directly within the meeting, making it easy to collaborate without awkward screen-sharing struggles. Plus, it syncs perfectly with Google Drive, so recordings and transcripts (if you have a paid plan) are stored automatically without me lifting a finger.

While the free version is excellent for basic calls, I quickly realized that some of the features I really wanted—like recording and breakout rooms—were locked behind a paywall. The minimalist interface is great for simplicity, but I sometimes wished for more customization options, like virtual backgrounds that didn’t make me look like I was floating in space. 

Plus, if you’re working with participants outside the Google ecosystem, getting them onboard can sometimes feel like a hurdle, mainly if they’re not used to Chrome-based tools.

What I like about Google Meet:

  •  Since I already live in Google’s ecosystem, everything feels connected. I love how meeting links are auto-generated in Calendar invites and how files from Drive are easily accessible without digging through tabs. It’s basically productivity on autopilot.
  • I was pleasantly surprised by how well Meet handles live transcriptions. Whether I was in a noisy environment or dealing with accents, the captions kept up and made it easier to follow conversations.

What G2 users like about Google Meet:

“The setup is super easy—just send a link, and anyone can join without having to download anything (which is a huge plus when you’re dealing with clients or team members who aren’t tech-savvy). The video and audio quality are solid, even if my internet connection isn’t the best.”

 

- Google Meet Review, Samarth N.

What I dislike about Google Meet:
  • While I appreciate the clean design, it feels a bit too basic. There aren’t many layout options, fun virtual backgrounds, or branding features that could make meetings more engaging.
  • I quickly realized that I'd need a paid plan to record meetings, set up breakout rooms, or use advanced host controls. It’s great for quick calls but not ideal for more complex virtual events unless you're willing to pay.
What G2 users dislike about Google Meet:

“I personally think there is a need to improve the layout of the meeting if many people are present at once. During our meetings or any fun activity, there are usually more than 40 agents present at once, but if we try to take a screenshot of all the present folks, Google Meet shows around 30 folks at once on a screen. We can try to increase the possibility of showing more folks on a screen simultaneously.”

- Google Meet Review, Sunil S.

Want to host seamless webinars? Check out the best webinar software tested and reviewed by my team. Discover the top platforms to help you connect, engage, and impress.

2. Microsoft Teams

When I first started using Microsoft Teams, I quickly concluded that it’s not just about meetings; it’s about creating a fully integrated digital workspace where everything happens in one place. From video calls to document collaboration, chat, and task management, it aims to be the all-in-one solution for modern professionals. 

One of the first things I tested was how well it handled meetings in different settings—one-on-one calls, team stand-ups, or webinars. The video and audio quality were solid, but I did notice that performance dipped slightly when multiple participants had their cameras on in HD, especially on lower-end devices. 

 

Microsoft Teams

Source

What stood out to me the most was the Together Mode, which places all attendees in a shared virtual background, like a classroom or auditorium. This feature made meetings feel more engaging and less fatiguing than staring at the usual grid of floating faces.

Teams really shine because of its deep integration with Microsoft 365. During meetings, I could easily share and edit Word documents, PowerPoint slides, and Excel sheets without juggling multiple apps or tabs. This was especially useful in collaborative meetings, where everyone needed to make quick edits in real time. 

Another standout feature is the ability to record meetings and store them directly in OneDrive or SharePoint, making it easy to refer back to key discussions without manually saving files elsewhere.

However, setting up and navigating through Teams can feel daunting if you're new to it. The interface is packed with options, and finding specific features—especially during live meetings—often requires too many clicks. Notifications also became overwhelming, with constant pings from chat messages, channel updates, and meeting reminders, making it necessary to fine-tune my notification settings to avoid distractions. 

While the platform works beautifully within the Microsoft ecosystem, I found that inviting external participants, especially those without Microsoft accounts, could sometimes lead to unnecessary friction with access permissions and compatibility issues.

Another drawback I noticed was how resource-intensive Teams can be. When hosting larger meetings with screen sharing, chat activity, and document collaboration all running simultaneously, I experienced occasional lag and slowdowns, particularly on older devices.

What I like about Microsoft Teams:

  • Beyond just meetings, I loved having a chat, file sharing, and task management all in a single space. It made it easier to track projects without bouncing between different apps.
  •  I preferred that recordings get automatically saved to the cloud and that they come with searchable transcripts, making it easy to revisit essential discussions.

What G2 users like about Microsoft Teams:

“I like the fact that I can access the tool from everywhere - on my desktop and my phone. It allows me to have multiple workspaces so I can connect to my own organization as well as to the organizations of my customers. I think it is a good tool for all kinds of communication (written and meetings) with many features and integration capabilities.”

 

- Microsoft Teams Review, Ulrike H.

What I dislike about Microsoft Teams:
  • Unlike some simpler video conferencing tools, I found Teams’ interface dense with multiple tabs, menus, and features. It often took too many clicks to access basic meeting controls.
  • It was a hassle to invite external users, especially those without Microsoft accounts, which often led to permission issues, requiring me to take extra steps to grant access and troubleshoot.
What G2 users dislike about Microsoft Teams:

“I have faced some performance challenges. Teams tend to run slower on less powerful devices. Managing and organizing files shared within channels or chats can also become increasingly difficult as the volume grows. Additionally, the search functionality has limitations, making it challenging to locate specific content within chats.”

- Microsoft Teams Review, Ashrith S.

Sharpen your virtual communication skills and make every meeting count. Check out our tips on remote work communication to stay connected, productive, and engaged—no matter where you are.

3. Webex Suite

Webex Suite surprised me the most. It’s like it took the traditional video conferencing experience and upgraded it with a blend of premium features and enterprise-level reliability. 

It’s not just a tool for meetings—it’s an entire platform designed for seamless collaboration, with video calls, messaging, webinars, and even calling wrapped into one cohesive package.

The meeting quality immediately stood out for me. The audio clarity was top-notch, even when participants had less-than-stellar internet connections. The built-in adaptive video resolution adjusted smoothly without interrupting the flow of the meeting—a big plus when some attendees were dialing in from less-than-ideal setups.

Webex

I also experimented with its real-time translation feature, which can translate over 100 languages during live meetings. It felt like having a personal interpreter on standby and was incredibly useful for global teams.

Webex Suite’s AI-powered features also caught my attention. From People Insights, which gives you a snapshot of who you’re meeting with, to gesture recognition (yes, it picks up when you give a thumbs-up or clap), the tool feels like it’s designed to keep interactions lively and intuitive. Let’s talk about its noise-cancellation technology. I tested it in a busy café, and the other participants swore they could hear only my voice, not the espresso machine in the background.

One feature that truly elevated the experience was the whiteboarding tool. It’s integrated directly into the platform and lets participants collaborate visually in real time. No need to open another app or share your screen awkwardly—it’s all right there. Plus, integrating tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams ensures it fits seamlessly into different workflows.

However, while Webex delivers a lot, it’s not without its challenges. The user interface feels a bit complex, especially for first-time users. There are so many options buried in menus that it can be easy to feel lost if you’re just trying to set up a quick call. I also ran into occasional compatibility issues when participants were using older hardware or slower internet connections, which led to lag and performance hiccups.

Another downside? The pricing. Webex isn’t the most budget-friendly option out there, especially for small businesses or solo professionals. Many of the advanced features, like extensive webinar capabilities and deep analytics, are locked behind higher-tier plans, making it a tough sell for smaller teams that don’t need enterprise-level tools.

What I like about Webex Suite:

  • I was impressed by how Webex maintained quality even with participants on weaker connections. It dynamically adjusted video resolution without causing interruptions, making every meeting feel professional.
  • Real-time translation worked well for global collaboration. I tested it with a multilingual team, and it translated live conversations seamlessly into multiple languages on the fly.

What G2 users like about Webex Suite:

“Webex Meeting is mostly used because most of the time, I use it to schedule meetings with the team and virtually with colleagues from different locations to discuss the ongoing project and implementation. Webex meeting is a very light and reliable collaboration solution. Webex provides lots of features: event, meeting, whiteboard, video/audio calling, and slide.”

 

- Webex Suite Review, Rezaullah F.

What I dislike about Webex Suite:
  • In a session with over 100 participants, I noticed slight delays in audio and video synchronization, particularly when using interactive features like polls or whiteboards.
  • Some of Webex’s standout features, like real-time translation or whiteboarding, aren’t immediately obvious. I had to dig through tutorials and guides to figure out how to use them effectively.
What G2 users dislike about Webex Suite:

“I get frustrated with the occasional performance problems, especially when the connection becomes unstable during busy times. Also, some features feel complicated and might need extra guidance or training for new users to make the most of them.”

- Webex Suite Review, Kunal S.

Ready to take your virtual meetings to the next level? Check out our comprehensive guide on meeting management software to learn how you can stay ahead in the remote work era.

4. Zoom Workplace

Zoom Workplace is like the reliable workhorse of video conferencing—it’s everywhere, and for good reason. Whether you’re jumping into a quick one-on-one, running a large webinar, or collaborating with a global team, Zoom has built a reputation for being fast, intuitive, and rock-solid. 

When I started using Zoom Workplace, I was curious to see if it lived up to the hype, and I have to say—it delivers on most fronts, but there are still a few areas where it could improve.

Zoom

What really caught my attention during testing was Zoom’s AI-powered assistant, a surprisingly bright addition that makes meetings feel more productive and less chaotic. This AI assistant can generate meeting summaries, highlight key discussion points, and even suggest follow-up actions—all without me needing to take constant notes.

I tested this feature during a particularly fast-paced brainstorming session, and the recap it provided afterward was impressively accurate. It captured action items and summarized the conversation so well that I could instantly share it with my team, saving us all valuable time.

Another useful aspect was the AI-driven transcription and translation, which works in real time. Whether I was meeting with international colleagues or needed an accurate text version of the discussion, the assistant stepped in and provided reliable transcriptions across multiple languages. It’s an excellent feature for remote teams working across different time zones and languages.

I tested Zoom’s meeting features in different scenarios—team stand-ups, client presentations, and even a large webinar with breakout rooms. The video quality was excellent, even in high-resolution mode, and the audio clarity remained stable with minimal lag, even when participants were in different time zones with varying network speeds. 

I also experimented with Zoom’s Smart Gallery, which uses AI to create individual video feeds for participants in shared spaces—perfect for hybrid work setups where multiple people might be joining from the same conference call room.

Another standout feature was the virtual backgrounds and touch-up filters, which are surprisingly good. Whether I needed to blur my messy background or enhance my appearance for an important client call, the customization options were robust and polished.

However, Zoom’s free version has a time limit that can be frustrating for longer meetings. While upgrading to a paid plan unlocks more features, the costs can add up quickly—especially for small businesses. I also found that Zoom’s performance can be resource-heavy, with my CPU usage spiking during larger meetings with screen sharing and HD video enabled.

Additionally, while Zoom is known for its ease of use, the number of settings available can sometimes feel overwhelming. It took me a while to fully explore advanced features like webinar registration management, analytics, and third-party integrations, which, while powerful, aren’t always the most intuitive to navigate.

What I like about Zoom Workplace:

  • I loved how simple it was to assign participants to different rooms, shuffle them around, and bring everyone back together with a single click—perfect for workshops and brainstorming sessions.
  • Recording meetings and storing them in the cloud was effortless. I liked how the system provided automatic transcripts and allowed easy sharing afterward.

What G2 users like about  Zoom Workplace:

“What I like most about Zoom is that it allows me to run my business completely. Initially, it is an easy-to-use tool. The background of my room is not very pleasant, but thanks to Zoom, I can place a fake background that allows me to conduct interviews regardless of how my house looks. I love that it allows me to record, so I can conduct conferences, masterclasses, and interviews with my clients and then transcribe them, thanks to its smart transcription tool. I use it very frequently, almost daily.”

 

- Zoom Workplace Review, Jesus M.

What I dislike about Zoom Workplace:
  • Unlike some competitors, Zoom doesn’t offer much offline functionality beyond basic recording playback. I always needed a stable connection to make the most of the platform.
  • When sharing multiple screens or switching between applications, I experienced occasional delays and minor glitches, which could be frustrating during fast-paced presentations.
What G2 users dislike about Zoom Workplace:

“Zoom can sometimes be resource-heavy, especially on older devices, which causes occasional lag or crashes. Additionally, the security features—though improved—require a bit of extra setup to ensure all meetings are fully protected. Overall, Zoom Workplace is an excellent solution for improving communication and collaboration, allowing us to stay connected and productive no matter where we are.”

- Zoom Workplace Review, Matt C. 

5. Slack

Slack has always been known as the go-to messaging app for teams, but with its recent upgrades, it's evolving into a full-fledged collaboration hub—including video conferencing, huddles, and deep integrations with other workplace tools. 

When I started using Slack for video calls and team check-ins, I wondered if it could replace traditional video conferencing platforms or be better suited as a supplementary tool. Spoiler alert: it’s got some impressive features, but it’s not without its quirks.

Slack

Source

One of the most interesting aspects of Slack is its Huddles feature, which offers a casual, audio-first way to connect with colleagues instantly—almost like dropping by their desks in a virtual office. I found this feature great for spontaneous brainstorming sessions or quick alignment chats without the formality of scheduling a full-fledged meeting. 

The transition from chat to voice (and even lightweight video sharing) is seamless, making it an ideal tool for remote teams who want to keep communication flowing without friction.

When I put Slack’s video conferencing feature to the test, I was impressed by how well it integrated with the rest of the platform. I could pull up documents, share screens, and even use emoji reactions—all without having to leave the conversation thread. The screen-sharing experience was exceptionally smooth, with options to let participants annotate directly on shared content, which was ideal for real-time collaboration.

Another major win? Deep integrations with other productivity tools. Whether it was Google Drive, Zoom, or Asana, Slack made it incredibly easy to pull in files, track tasks, and even automate workflows with Slack bots. The built-in AI assistant also helped surface important messages and reminders, reducing the time I spent searching for things buried in endless chat threads.

However, Slack’s video capabilities still feel like an add-on rather than a core strength. While it’s perfect for quick team check-ins and one-on-one meetings, I found that larger group meetings lacked some of the structure and polish offered by dedicated video conferencing tools. 

Managing significant calls (10+ people) can get chaotic without features like breakout rooms or advanced host controls. Also, the video quality tends to fluctuate depending on network stability, and the platform doesn’t offer the same adaptive resolution control as competitors like Zoom or Webex.

What I like about Slack:

  • I loved how easy it was to jump into a quick audio call with my team without the hassle of setting up a formal meeting. It felt like the virtual equivalent of a hallway chat.
  • Slack does a great job of keeping everything within context. I could quickly jump from a chat thread into a video call, sharing files and taking notes.

What G2 users like about Slack:

“I really appreciate Slack's add-ons and utilities that make my life in the office easier. I can annotate and share screens with other users, and thanks to huddles, I don't have to call formal meetings to share screens and make quick calls. I can organize my to-do list and make video calls with reminders at the same time. I click the add-on button once to add the link to invitations and start scheduled or instant meetings. The most attractive feature for me is its ability to detect background noise and integrate with the video tools and devices I already own. Its adaptability to remote or hybrid teams, customization options, and ease of use make it a desirable alternative for improving internal collaboration and productivity.”

 

- Slack Review, Brandon Z.

What I dislike about Slack:
  • Slack lacks advanced features like breakout rooms, waiting rooms, and participant management, which I get in a dedicated video conferencing tool.
  • Unlike other conferencing tools, Slack doesn’t offer built-in recording for video calls, which means I had to rely on third-party integrations to save discussions for later reference.
What G2 users dislike about Slack:

“I can't say that I dislike it, but the cost of plans went up recently. I noticed that the mobile app version experienced lagging. In comparison to other messaging software, the quality of video calls should be improved when speaking with clients.”

- Slack Review, Krenil B.

6. Skype

Skype is the OG video conferencing tool. It's been around forever, and for me, it was my first introduction to online video calls. Over the years, it has evolved from a simple call-and-chat tool into a more feature-rich communication platform that’s still widely used for both personal and professional interactions. 

Naturally, I wanted to see if Skype could still compete in today’s crowded video-conferencing landscape, and my experience was a mix of nostalgia and discovery.

Skype

I found Skype quite accessible and cross-platform-friendly. Whether I was using a laptop, mobile phone, or even a smart TV, Skype worked seamlessly across devices. The installation process was quick, and signing in with a Microsoft account was a breeze—primarily if you already use other Microsoft services. I tested calls across different devices, and the synchronization was spot on, making it easy to switch between devices mid-call.

One of Skype's standout features is its call quality, which remains impressively stable even on slower connections. Thanks to Skype's adaptive bandwidth technology, video and audio quality adjust automatically based on internet conditions, which was a relief when I was working from a café with spotty Wi-Fi. The noise suppression feature also worked surprisingly well, keeping background sounds to a minimum and ensuring my voice was evident throughout.

Skype’s screen-sharing capabilities were also solid. I could present slides and walk through documents without any significant hiccups. However, compared to modern tools like Zoom or Teams, Skype lacks some finesse in collaborative features—there’s no interactive annotation or whiteboarding, which I missed when working on brainstorming sessions with my team.

The interface also feels outdated, and while it’s functional, it doesn’t have the polished, modern look of its competitors. Navigating through contacts and settings felt a bit clunky, and finding certain features (like call scheduling) wasn’t as intuitive as I’d hoped. The lack of robust meeting management features—such as breakout rooms, host controls, and participant analytics—makes Skype more suited for casual one-on-one calls rather than large, structured meetings.

What I like about Skype:

  • I found the live subtitles and real-time captions super useful, especially in calls with non-native speakers or when dealing with technical topics that required extra clarity.
  • Whether I was on my laptop or phone or even using the web version, Skype worked consistently across all devices without issues.

What G2 users like about Skype:

“Skype is a great platform that we use in our office to connect with our clients. And since we use it daily, it's easier to integrate to share photos & screenshots and schedule meetings, and even the new feature to chat with yourself makes it easy to remember things and keep minutes of meetings (MOM) ready. I have also used Skype personally to connect with my friends in different countries, and it is easy to implement. I honestly love Skype. ”

 

- Skype Review, Sakshi K.

What I dislike about Skype:
  • I didn’t enjoy using Skype’s design and interface. It looks and feels a bit clunky and old-fashioned, and it hasn’t evolved much in recent years.
  • Skype tends to consume a lot of system resources, especially when video is enabled for extended periods. My laptop fans kicked in more often than I’d like.
What G2 users dislike about Skype:

“Sometimes, Skype feels a bit old-school. Video quality can be glitchy, and the app can be confusing to navigate at times.”

- Skype Review, Omar S.

Unfamiliar with Skype? Check out our beginner’s guide on Skype to get answers to all your queries.

7. BlueJeans Meetings

BlueJeans Meetings might not be the first name that comes to mind when you think of video conferencing, but after diving into it, I found that it offers some impressive features that set it apart from the competition. 

Owned by Verizon, BlueJeans focuses on high-definition video and enterprise-grade security, making it a solid choice for businesses that need reliable and secure communication.

BlueJeans

When testing BlueJeans, I noticed its exceptional audio and video quality. Unlike some platforms that automatically downgrade quality based on bandwidth, BlueJeans prioritizes crisp visuals and Dolby Voice audio technology, which I found delivered a noticeably more affluent, more immersive sound experience. Whether I was in a quiet home office or a noisy café, background noise was well managed, and the voices came through crystal clear without the usual “tin can” effect.

Another standout feature is Smart Meetings, an AI-powered tool that enhances productivity by offering automatic highlights, action items, and intelligent meeting recaps. I tested this by recording a brainstorming session, and the AI did a surprisingly good job identifying key moments and creating a concise meeting summary I could share with my team. This feature is fantastic for teams that frequently hold strategy sessions and need quick recaps without manual note-taking.

Screen sharing on BlueJeans was another highlight for me. It’s optimized for high-resolution content, so when I shared detailed presentations and videos, they appeared sharp with minimal lag. I also liked the ability to share specific applications rather than my entire screen, which added an extra layer of privacy.

However, BlueJeans isn't perfect. While it excels in performance and security, the user interface feels a bit outdated, and I found navigating the settings to be less intuitive than competitors. Some basic actions—like managing breakout rooms or switching audio sources—required more clicks than I expected, which slowed things down during live meetings.

I also found that while BlueJeans integrates with major platforms like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, the ecosystem of third-party integrations isn’t as extensive as Zoom or Teams. If you rely on tools like Slack, Trello, or CRM platforms, you may find BlueJeans a bit limited in terms of native integrations.

What I like about BlueJeans Meetings:

  • I appreciated the option to share only specific apps instead of my whole screen, which added an extra layer of control during presentations.
  • This AI-powered feature saved me tons of time by automatically summarizing key moments and follow-up tasks. No more frantic note-taking.

What G2 users like about BlueJeans Meetings:

“Occasionally, there is an echo issue when participants forget to mute their computer mics while using their phones. Additionally, BlueJeans needs to improve its market penetration. Its features are excellent, but the product isn't widely available, which limits its effectiveness since not many people use it. For BlueJeans to compete with platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, or Teams, it must become more widespread. The app itself is great, and although a bit more complicated than others in its category, it becomes more intuitive with time.

 

- BlueJeans Meetings, Ashwinikumar L.

What I dislike about BlueJeans Meetings:
  • While the desktop app runs smoothly, I found the web version to be slightly more limited in terms of features and overall performance, especially when managing larger meetings.
  • BlueJeans doesn’t offer native virtual backgrounds or touch-up features, which can be a downside for users like me who want more video personalization.
What G2 users dislike about BlueJeans Meetings:

“I was facing challenges while connecting with the customer support team as the wait time was very long to resolve my issues. So they should improve the support team to respond quickly to customers' issues.”

- BlueJeans Meeting Review, Rangarajan H.

8. GoTo Meeting

GoTo Meeting has been a staple in the video conferencing world for years. It is known for its reliability and simplicity, especially for businesses that need a no-frills, dependable meeting solution. When I started using GoTo Meeting, I was eager to see if it could stand up to newer competitors with more feature-packed offerings. 

While it doesn’t have all the flashy bells and whistles, it does deliver a solid, professional meeting experience, focusing on high-quality audio, strong security, and user-friendly controls.

GoTo Meeting

One of the first things I noticed was how lightweight and fast the platform is. Unlike some video conferencing tools that can feel heavy and sluggish, GoTo Meeting runs smoothly even on lower-end devices, which makes it great for team members who might not have the latest hardware. I tested it on both desktop and mobile, and the experience was consistent, with minimal lag or connectivity issues.

The audio quality stood out as one of GoTo Meeting’s strongest features. Powered by their proprietary noise suppression technology, the calls were clear, with little to no background noise interference, even when I was in a noisy environment. 

I found the Call Me feature especially useful—it automatically dials participants' phones when the meeting starts, removing the need to fumble with dial-in numbers and PINs.

Another feature I appreciated was the drawing tools and shared keyboard/mouse control, which made collaboration much smoother during presentations and remote troubleshooting sessions. Unlike other platforms where screen sharing can be clunky, GoTo Meeting kept it soft and responsive, even when I shared high-resolution content.

However, I did find that GoTo Meeting’s interface feels a little outdated. While functional, the layout lacks the modern touch and intuitive design that would make navigation more seamless. There’s a learning curve, especially when setting up more advanced features like meeting scheduling or recording settings.

The platform also lacks engagement tools like polls, reactions, or breakout rooms, making meetings feel a bit dry—especially for larger, more interactive sessions. If you’re planning a webinar or a brainstorming session that requires audience participation, GoTo Meeting might not be the best choice.

What I like about GoTo Meeting:

  • I like that the audio quality never glitched. Participant voices came through clearly without background distractions, even in noisy environments.
  • I loved how GoTo Meeting could call me directly, removing the hassle of manually dialing into meetings. It’s a minor feature, but it adds a lot of convenience.

What G2 users like about GoTo Meeting:

“GoTo Meeting is the best in terms of sound and image quality, as it is a live broadcast in real time. I love the ease of organizing meetings and sending invitations and attachments via secure digital links. Accepting the invitation is direct, which makes it easy for invitees to participate effectively. Distributing roles during virtual meetings is easy, as the microphone can be turned off and transferred to another participant easily. I love sharing presentations that help provide a smooth explanation to participants. The documentation capabilities are great and useful in documenting what was agreed upon during the meeting.”

 

- GoTo Meeting Review, Hala K.

What I dislike about GoTo Meeting:
  • I missed the convenience of breakout rooms. This tool isn’t ideal for hosting workshops or group discussions, which is a downside compared to competitors.
  • I didn’t find sufficient personalization options for video meetings. There are no virtual backgrounds or touch-up filters.
What G2 users dislike about GoTo Meeting:

“The user interface, which some find less intuitive than other platforms. Another challenge can be occasional lag or technical issues during larger meetings, which might disrupt communication. Some users also mention that features like screen sharing or file uploads could be smoother, and the mobile app doesn’t always deliver the same experience as the desktop version. Lastly, the pricing might feel steep for smaller teams who don't utilize all the features.”

- GoTo Meeting Review, Ana B.

Click to chat with G2s Monty AI

Comparison of the best video conferencing software

Software G2 Rating Free plan Ideal for
Google Meet 4.6/5 Yes, 60-minute limit Quick and simple meetings with seamless integration to Google Workspace
Microsoft Teams 4.3/5 Yes, with basic features Collaboration for large teams and integration with Microsoft 365
Webex Suite 4.2/5 Yes, limited features Secure, enterprise-level meetings and webinars
Zoom Workplace 4.5/5 Yes, 40-minute limit Versatile meetings with advanced collaboration features
Slack 4.5/5 Yes, limited video calls Small team communication with a  focus on messaging and occasional calls
Skype 4.3/5 Yes, unlimited video calls Personal and casual video calls
BlueJeans Meetings 4.3/5 No Corporate meetings with a focus on high-quality audio and video
GoTo Meeting 4.2/5 No Webinars and professional business meetings

Frequently asked questions about video conferencing software

Have more questions? Find more answers below.

What is the most popular software for video conferencing?

The most popular video conferencing software today is Zoom, which is known for its ease of use, high-quality video, and scalability. Other widely used platforms include Microsoft Teams, which integrates seamlessly with Office 365, and Google Meet, which is great for those already using Google Workspace. These platforms have become essential for businesses, educators, and casual users who need reliable virtual communication.

What is the best free video conferencing software?

If you're looking for free video conferencing apps, some of the top choices include:

  • Google Meet: Free for up to 60 minutes per call with up to 100 participants.
  • Zoom: 40-minute meeting limit but excellent for small team calls.
  • Microsoft Teams: Great for businesses already using Microsoft products.
  • Skype: No time limits for one-on-one calls and free group meetings of up to 100 participants.

What is the best free meeting app?

The best free meeting app largely depends on your needs. If you’re looking for a quick and straightforward solution, Google Meet or Skype are excellent choices. If you need more features, such as screen sharing and virtual backgrounds, Zoom’s free plan offers an outstanding balance of functionality and ease of use. 

Is free video conferencing software good enough for my needs?

Free versions are great for small teams or occasional use, but they often come with limitations like shorter meeting durations, fewer participants, and a lack of advanced features like analytics, recording storage, and integrations. If your business relies heavily on virtual meetings, upgrading to a paid plan might be necessary.

Let's call it a wrap

For me, choosing the best video conferencing software was like finding the perfect virtual handshake—I wanted it to be smooth, professional, and ideally glitch-free. 

Whether you’re looking for a free and easy solution like Google Meet, an all-in-one collaboration hub like Microsoft Teams, or the gold standard in video calls with Zoom, there’s a platform on my list that can perfectly meet versatile needs.

Each tool brought something unique to my (virtual) table—some offer top-tier security for enterprise-level meetings, while others shine with fun engagement features like breakout rooms and virtual backgrounds. For me, the key was to figure out what matters most: ease of use, seamless integrations, or rock-solid reliability.

You now have all my insights to make the right call, whether you're hosting team huddles, giving client presentations, or just catching up with friends and family. So, take your pick and meet with confidence—just don’t forget to unmute yourself!

Explore the exciting world of VR conferencing and discover how immersive technology can revolutionize collaboration and connection.


Get this exclusive AI content editing guide.

By downloading this guide, you are also subscribing to the weekly G2 Tea newsletter to receive marketing news and trends. You can learn more about G2's privacy policy here.