Nice to meet you.

Enter your email to receive our weekly G2 Tea newsletter with the hottest marketing news, trends, and expert opinions.

8 Best Statistical Analysis Software That You Can't Ignore

January 30, 2025

best statistical analysis software

When I first learned statistics in high school, it felt like piecing together a puzzle: manually calculating probabilities and drawing graphs. Statistical software seemed unnecessary back then, but studying economics in college changed that. Managing larger datasets and complex analyses became overwhelming. I had to adapt and learn to use the best statistical analysis software to interpret data, run regressions, and make sense of the numbers.

Later, while working with data professionals, I gained a deeper appreciation for the nuances of these tools. We evaluated various statistical analysis software, comparing their strengths and weaknesses. My research and G2 user reviews taught me that the right software simplifies workflows, eases complex analyses, and ensures accuracy. But I also noticed how technical challenges, like limited functionality, compatibility with data formats, or un-intuitive interfaces, could slow down even the most experienced analysts.

This list combines the best statistical analysis software to help you avoid those frustrations. Whether you're looking for a user-friendly platform, advanced modeling capabilities, or software tailored for specific industries, you'll find options here that cater to newcomers and experienced data professionals. By choosing the right tool, you can focus less on wrestling with the software and more on uncovering essential insights.

8 best statistical analysis software I recommend

For me, statistical analysis software is a gateway to making sense of raw data. These programs are designed to help users process, analyze, and interpret datasets, ranging from simple descriptive statistics to complex predictive modeling. Features like regression analysis, hypothesis testing, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and time series forecasting allow you to dig deeper into patterns, correlations, and trends.

How did we find and evaluate the best statistical analysis software?

I collaborated with data professionals to explore various statistical analysis software, evaluating everything from basic tools for descriptive statistics to advanced platforms with AI-powered predictive modeling. I also spoke with real-world users to understand how these tools perform across different scenarios. I evaluated their core features, identified pain points, and used AI to analyze hundreds of G2 reviews for deeper insights. Additionally, I cross-referenced all external insights with G2’s Grid Reports, assessing each software based on ease of use, analytical power, and overall value for money. After this comprehensive research, I’ve curated a list of the best statistical analysis software solutions. All the screenshots in this article are gathered either from the vendor's G2 page or publicly available material.

What I find particularly valuable is how these tools automate repetitive calculations, support large datasets, and offer advanced features like multivariate analysis and machine learning integration. They also provide powerful data visualization options like scatterplots, histograms, and heatmaps that make it easier to present findings in a way that's both impactful and easy to understand.

Beyond the technical aspects, I’ve learned that compatibility matters, too. Good statistical software integrates well with tools like Excel, R, Python, or databases like SQL. Whether working with financial models, running econometric analyses, or conducting A/B tests, statistical analysis software has become indispensable for turning complex datasets into actionable insights.

How I evaluated, compared, and selected the best statistical analysis software

I considered the following factors while testing the top statistical analysis tools.

  • Statistical capabilities: When choosing statistical analysis software, I first consider whether it supports the specific methods needed. Whether it’s regression analysis, ANOVA, time series forecasting, or more advanced techniques like Bayesian analysis or machine learning, the software has to align with the complexity of projects. Look for a tool that allows you to explore the data comprehensively without running into limitations when things get technical.
  • Data handling and performance: Data volume can be a real bottleneck in analysis, so I pay close attention to how well the statistical analysis software handles large and complex datasets. It’s essential that the tool processes data efficiently without lagging or crashing. Scalability is also a key consideration. 
  • Reproducibility and documentation: Good statistical analysis software allows users to annotate their workflows, save data analysis steps, and share them easily with colleagues. This not only ensures collaboration runs smoothly but also helps maintain the integrity of work. A clear, documented process makes validating and replicating the results easier.
  • Integration capabilities: Integration capabilities are necessary because no software can operate in a vacuum. The best tools need to work seamlessly with the other systems and platforms used, whether importing data from SQL databases, integrating with R or Python for custom scripts, or exporting results to a data visualization platform. This compatibility makes the workflow smoother and saves users from unnecessary back-and-forth conversions.
  • Cost and licensing: Budget is always a factor, so I evaluate the cost of the software carefully. I consider not only the upfront licensing fees but also any recurring subscription costs, update charges, or additional technical support expenses. Open-source software can be an appealing alternative when budgets are tight, but I weigh that against the potential trade-offs, like a steeper learning curve or less reliable support.

I considered all these factors when evaluating statistical analysis software to ensure I found the best options. I focused on their ability to handle diverse statistical methods, from basic calculations to complex modeling, while also evaluating how intuitive and user-friendly they were. I explored how each tool performed with large datasets and how well they integrated with platforms like R, Python, and SQL. Cost was another key consideration. Finally, I prioritized tools with strong support systems, detailed documentation, and reproducibility features to ensure seamless collaboration and accurate results. These criteria guided my selections and ensured I only chose tools that could truly deliver.

To be included in the statistical analysis software category, a product must:

  • Support advanced and complex statistical analyses
  • Enable seamless data importing, preparation, and modeling
  • Include robust statistical analysis capabilities, equations, and modeling tools

*This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews may have been edited for clarity.  

1. IBM SPSS Statistics

IBM SPSS Statistics is frequently praised on G2 for offering a comprehensive suite of tools for advanced statistical analysis. Many users recommend it for regression analysis, multivariate testing, and factor analysis, especially when working with complex datasets. I noticed several reviewers highlighting the value of its specialized modules for niche tasks like time-series forecasting and survival analysis—making it a go-to for academic and professional research.

SPSS is also considered highly reliable when handling large datasets. G2 users often point out that it maintains accuracy and data integrity, even when performing complex calculations. Unlike some platforms that may crash or produce errors under load, SPSS is seen as minimizing the risk of data loss during intensive analysis. This level of reliability is one reason it’s popular in data-heavy industries like finance and healthcare.

I’ve seen strong feedback around SPSS’s capabilities with survey data, too. It offers built-in tools for analyzing Likert scales, running cross-tabulations, and summarizing responses—features that market researchers and social scientists regularly rely on. Reviewers also appreciate that data can be imported from various survey platforms with minimal hassle.

Another feature that gets a lot of attention is the SPSS syntax editor. Advanced users value the ability to automate workflows by writing and saving custom scripts. I’ve seen several mentions of how this saves time when working with large datasets or repeating complex analyses. The editor’s built-in error-checking is also viewed as a plus, helping scripts run smoothly and accurately 

ibm spss
 According to G2 reviews, IBM SPSS Statistics helps users uncover hidden patterns and predict trends using tools like regression models, decision trees, and clustering algorithms. I came across several reviewers who’ve used it for customer segmentation, risk analysis, and demand forecasting. SPSS also supports advanced statistical methods such as structural equation modeling and multivariate analysis, which users find valuable for conducting complex, multi-variable studies.

That said, a recurring theme in user feedback is the platform’s rigidity. SPSS tends to operate within a fairly fixed framework, which can be limiting for users who want to integrate with non-standard data sources or create custom visualizations. I’ve seen reviews mentioning that this lack of flexibility makes personalization difficult and can be frustrating in more tailored workflows.

The interface is another point of contention. G2 users often describe it as outdated compared to modern statistical tools with cleaner, more streamlined designs. The menu-driven workflows, while functional, feel cumbersome to those accustomed to more intuitive platforms.

Despite its strong reputation for reliability, SPSS doesn’t always perform smoothly with extremely large datasets. I noticed several users reporting slowdowns during complex computations and multi-variable analyses. For teams working in time-sensitive environments or with big data, this can become a bottleneck.

What I like about IBM SPSS Statistics:

  • Users are impressed by SPSS’s ability to handle survey data with built-in tools for analyzing Likert scales, cross-tabulations, and summarizing results. 
  • G2 reviewers loved how the SPSS syntax editor saved them time by automating tasks through custom scripts that replicate workflows. It’s especially helpful for handling large datasets or complex analyses.

What G2 users like about IBM SPSS Statistics:

“I am not an expert in statistics, but I found IBM SPSS Statistics very easy to use. It's way less scary than trying to code everything on my own. There are a lot of tutorials and helpful menus too, which is very handy whenever there is some difficulty with any task.

IBM SPSS Statistics has a lot of features. It can do simple things like averages, and percentages to difficult analyses that I do not even understand (e.g. multivariate regressions). A lot of features with the software help me in my day to day tasks and assignments.

IBM SPSS Statistics shows clear results, which is something that I expect from software like this. The tables and charts are simple and easy to understand, even for someone like me who's not an expert in statistics. It makes it convenient for me to explain my findings to teammates and other stakeholders.”

- IBM SPSS Statistics Review, Rajan S.
What I dislike about IBM SPSS Statistics:
  • While IBM SPSS Statistics is powerful, several reviewers found its rigid framework limiting when they wanted to integrate unconventional data sources or create unique visualizations. 
  • SPSS's interface feels outdated compared to modern statistical tools with more polished designs. The menu-driven workflows can be cumbersome.
What G2 users dislike about IBM SPSS Statistics:

“The pricing is overwhelming for beginners and small organizations. I would love more optimized SPSS for big data analytics like other big data engines such as Apache Spark or Power BI.”

- IBM SPSS Statistics Review, Mohammed G.

Looking to analyze medical data? Learn types and applications of healthcare data analytics

2. SAS Viya

Users liked how SAS Viya reduced the need for extensive programming. This version allows you to perform data analysis in real time directly through a browser, eliminating the complexities of traditional programming environments. 

SAS Viya also offers numerous automated features that simplify data preparation, programming, and visualization. These features helped users avoid repetitive tasks and focus on interpretation and decision-making. Automation enhances productivity for teams managing large datasets by significantly reducing manual labor and human error.

I’ve seen G2 reviewers consistently highlight the strength of SAS Viya’s visualization tools. Users mention being able to create dynamic, interactive charts and dashboards that make it easier to explore, analyze, and share insights. Many say these visualizations are especially useful in presentations and stakeholder meetings, helping to communicate complex findings in a more accessible way.

Another point that comes up often is SAS Viya’s flexibility with open-source languages. According to reviewers, the platform integrates well with Python, R, and Java, allowing teams to use their preferred tools alongside SAS. For example, users might handle data preprocessing in Python and then shift to SAS Viya for visualization and advanced analytics. This kind of interoperability helps reduce tool-switching and supports a more streamlined workflow.

sas viya

I’ve seen G2 reviewers—especially those in data-intensive fields—highlight SAS Viya’s strength in real-time analytics. Teams working in areas like Internet of Things (IoT) and AI often point out its ability to process and analyze streaming data with minimal delay, which enables immediate action. This seems particularly valuable in industries like manufacturing, where real-time monitoring can prevent costly downtime, and in AI use cases, where fast feedback loops help refine models more effectively.

That said, some users express frustration over the platform’s lack of open-source flexibility. I came across feedback from teams who wished they could modify the underlying code or add custom features directly, but found those options restricted unless going through SAS. This limitation made it harder to adapt the platform to highly specific needs.

Infrastructure requirements also come up as a challenge. Reviewers mention that to fully leverage SAS Viya in cloud deployments, they had to invest in hardware upgrades, additional storage, or expanded cloud capacity. For smaller organizations with tighter budgets or leaner IT resources, this can pose a real barrier.

While the interface gets positive feedback for being approachable at a basic level, I’ve also seen reviews suggesting a steep learning curve for more advanced features—particularly in areas like machine learning or custom programming. Some users felt that realizing the platform’s full potential required dedicated training or prior experience.

What I like about SAS Viya:

  • Users appreciate how SAS Viya minimizes the need for complex programming. Being able to perform real-time data analysis directly through a browser makes the process much simpler and more efficient.
  • Creating dynamic, interactive charts and dashboards helped teams analyze data better and made presenting insights to stakeholders much more effective. Users also like how it integrates with open-source languages like Python and R, making it easy to switch between tools for different parts of the workflow.

What G2 users like about SAS Viya:

“Currently, I am working on SAS Viya as a Data analyst. I like using SAS Viya software due to its simplicity. It is so easy to understand all coding languages. It helps us with big data analysis and data modeling. Also, I like it because it doesn’t get stuck in the code running process. The customer care service is one of the best if I have any query regarding the software.”

- SAS Viya Review, Manik K.
What I dislike about SAS Viya:
  • One thing I noticed in G2 reviews is that SAS Viya can feel restrictive. Since it’s proprietary, users aren’t able to modify the underlying code or add custom features without going through SAS. Compared to open-source platforms, several reviewers found this limiting.
  • Another common drawback is the infrastructure demand. I’ve seen teams mention needing to upgrade hardware, expand storage, or increase cloud capacity just to fully utilize the software. For smaller organizations with tight budgets, this can be a significant hurdle.
What I dislike about SAS Viya:

“Due to its extensive features and capabilities, there can be a learning curve, especially for beginners. Once users are familiar with the platform, they often find its vast functionality worth the initial investment in time and training.”

- SAS Viya Review, Verified User in Government Administration

Looking to use artificial intelligence for data analytics? Learn how AI data analytics can transform your workflow. 

3. JMP

JMP offers an extensive suite of statistical tools covering a wide range of analytical needs, from basic descriptive statistics to complex predictive modeling. Users liked its ability to create interactive graphs, charts, and dashboards. This visualization capability helped them instantly adjust variables and see their impact on the graphs.

I’ve seen several G2 reviewers highlight the value of JMP’s scripting language (JSL) for building custom workflows. Users mention using JSL to automate repetitive tasks like monthly reports or routine quality control checks. I also came across reviews where teams created custom dashboards tailored to their specific needs, making the platform more adaptable across different industries.

JMP also gets strong feedback for its exploratory data analysis capabilities. Reviewers say it’s especially useful for uncovering trends, relationships, and anomalies. I noticed multiple users pointing out how the platform makes it easy to identify outliers or correlations using built-in visual and statistical tools. Unlike other platforms that require a lot of preprocessing, JMP is often praised for letting users dive directly into raw data.

JMP
Another thing users appreciate about JMP is its ability to manage large datasets without significant slowdowns. For example, in manufacturing or healthcare, datasets often contain millions of rows, and JMP can handle these efficiently. This scalability ensures that users do not need to worry about data size constraints, which can be a limitation in other software. 

While JMP is beginner-friendly for basic tasks, mastering its advanced functionalities can be challenging. Features such as scripting in JSL require specialized knowledge, which may not be intuitive for users without programming experience. 

G2 reviewers also didn’t like how JMP lacks features like real-time collaboration, version control, or simultaneous editing. This limitation can slow down organizations with geographically dispersed teams and reduce their productivity. 

What I like about JMP:

  • G2 reviewers often highlight JMP’s ability to create interactive graphs, charts, and dashboards. I’ve seen users mention how adjusting variables in real time and instantly seeing the impact on visualizations makes data exploration more intuitive and dynamic.
  • The platform’s scripting language, JSL, also gets a lot of praise. According to reviews, it helps automate repetitive tasks like monthly reporting and quality control checks. I noticed several users say this flexibility saves them significant time and effort in their day-to-day analysis workflows.

What G2 users like about JMP:

“JMP offers a wide variety of statistical tools that are surprisingly easy to use whether you're a beginner or a seasoned data analyst. One thing that stands out to me is how it simplifies otherwise complicated analysis tasks. For example, its interactive visuals and intuitive design make diving into data less intimidating. Plus, being able to customize scripts and automate workflows has saved me so much time; it’s been a real productivity booster.”

- JMP Review, Armin S.
What I dislike about JMP:
  • While JMP is often praised for its ease of use with basic tasks, I’ve seen several G2 reviewers mention that mastering its advanced features—especially JSL and workflow automation—requires a steep learning curve. Many say it took considerable time and effort to get fully comfortable with scripting.
  • Another common drawback is the lack of real-time collaboration tools. Users note that JMP doesn’t support simultaneous editing or version control, which can make it difficult for distributed teams to work together efficiently on the same analysis or dashboard.
What G2 users dislike about JMP:

“Although it's easier for a professional to understand and use JMP, newcomers can find it difficult to understand various parameters in the functionality to perform reliable data analysis. Also, it can be tricky to understand complex data output if the parameters are different than similar software.”

- JMP Review, Devendra K.

Annotating data to provide context for training ML algorithms? Learn common data labeling methods and how they benefit you. 

4. Minitab Statistical Software

Minitab Statistical Software offers a broad range of statistical tools and techniques, including regression, ANOVA, and hypothesis testing. Users liked how this holistic toolkit allowed them to perform multiple analyses without requiring additional software. 

Minitab is also exceptionally good at handling large datasets and performing computations. Its ability to process data helped analysts spend more time interpreting results and implementing decisions rather than waiting for data analysis. 

Minitab's standout features are clear and visually appealing graphs, charts, and reports. Several reviews praised the software transforming complex data into easily understandable visuals like histograms, scatter plots, and control charts. 

Minitab Statistical Software

I’ve seen G2 reviewers consistently highlight how Minitab makes data import easy across multiple file formats, including Excel, CSV, and various databases. This flexibility helps teams integrate it into existing workflows without the hassle of reformatting or heavy preprocessing—something I noticed many users appreciate.

That said, there are a few clear limitations. A major pain point I noticed is macOS compatibility—Minitab primarily supports Windows, and users on Mac often resort to virtualization tools like Parallels or Boot Camp. Several reviewers mention that these workarounds are inconvenient, costly, and time-consuming.

Another recurring theme is that Minitab isn’t well-suited for more advanced applications like predictive modeling, natural language processing, or deep learning. Compared to platforms like R or Python, it lacks flexibility and support for modern machine learning workflows.

Licensing and installation also draw criticism. I’ve seen multiple reviews mentioning unclear billing terms and difficulties activating licenses, which created delays during setup.

What I like about Minitab Statistical Software:

  • I’ve seen G2 reviewers consistently highlight Minitab’s comprehensive set of statistical tools. Having access to regression, ANOVA, and hypothesis testing in one platform saves time and eliminates the need to juggle multiple tools.
  • Another thing I noticed is how often users praise the platform’s clean, visually intuitive charts. Graphs like scatter plots and control charts are frequently mentioned for helping teams turn complex data into easy-to-understand visuals.

What G2 users like about Minitab Statistical Software:

“It can do most any type of statistical analysis relatively well. It is a broad package that offers many different tools, and thus a very practical and powerful tool for a practicing statistician, engineer, or others engaged in data analysis and statistical application.”

- Minitab Statistical Software Review, Kerry S.
What I dislike about Minitab Statistical Software:
  • Users dislike that it doesn’t support macOS natively. Having to rely on virtualization software or dual-boot systems is inconvenient and adds unnecessary cost and complexity.
  • Reviewers also do not like its limited capabilities for advanced machine learning tasks like predictive modeling or deep learning. It feels outdated compared to the flexibility and power of tools like R or Python.
What G2 users dislike about Minitab Statistical Software:

“The data view and spreadsheet-like functionality could be better with filtering or sorting and data manipulation.”

- Minitab Statistical Software Review, Vimal O.

5. QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel 

QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel simplifies complex statistical processes. Users loved using it to quickly perform quality control and analysis tasks within Excel. This integration eliminates the need for separate statistical software, reducing the learning curve.

I’ve seen G2 users call out how helpful QI Macros SPC Add-in is for automating the more tedious parts of statistical analysis. Chart generation and data processing are handled automatically, which several reviewers say saves them from manually calculating statistics or formatting visuals. This is especially useful for teams working with large datasets or running multiple tests—it frees up time to focus on interpreting results instead of managing spreadsheets.

QI Macros also gets strong feedback for its support of statistical process control (SPC). Reviewers in quality management and production monitoring consistently mention how easy it is to apply SPC techniques using the tool. It’s commonly used in industries like manufacturing, healthcare, and services, where process monitoring and control are essential.

QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel

Several G2 users highlight QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel as a go-to tool for those involved in Six Sigma and lean manufacturing. It offers a solid set of statistical tools, including control charts, Pareto charts, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing. From what I’ve read, the combination of functionality and ease of use makes it especially appealing for quality professionals who want to stay within Excel.

That said, flexibility can be an issue. While QI Macros provides a wide range of predefined charts and reports, I’ve noticed reviewers mentioning that customizing them to fit specific needs isn’t always straightforward. This can be frustrating when working with niche datasets or trying to tailor outputs to unique reporting requirements.

Another drawback that comes up in reviews is the reliance on Excel. Users who work primarily in tools like R, Python, or more specialized data platforms say switching into Excel just to access QI Macros’ features can disrupt their workflow.

Performance is also something to watch. I came across several users who said QI Macros tends to slow down when processing large or high-dimensional datasets. While Excel generally handles data well, adding complex statistical tasks on top can cause lag, especially in data-heavy environments

What I like about QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel:

  • I’ve seen G2 reviewers consistently highlight how QI Macros simplifies complex statistical processes by integrating directly into Excel. Users appreciate not having to learn a separate platform, which significantly reduces the learning curve.
  • Another thing I noticed in reviews is how much time it saves by automating tasks like chart generation and data processing. Instead of spending time on manual calculations, users say they can focus more on analyzing results and drawing conclusions.

What I like about QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel:

“The best feature I like about QI Macros is the visual analysis with the help of tables and charts. The way it analyses raw data to provide key insights into uncharted business opportunities is delightful. Also, anyone unsure of the tool initially can opt for a 30-day trial which gives the user access to all the benefits and features the software offers.”

- QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel Review, Mithin M.
What I dislike about QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel:
  • I’ve seen G2 users mention the lack of flexibility when customizing predefined charts and reports. It can be frustrating when working with specific or niche data requirements that don’t fit the default templates.
  • Performance is another common issue. I noticed several reviewers pointing out that QI Macros can lag with very large datasets, especially during complex analysis tasks. This slowdown disrupts workflow efficiency and can be a real drawback in data-heavy environments.
What G2 users dislike about QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel:

“The add-in requires a purchase, which could be seen as a barrier for users or organizations with limited budgets, especially if they only need occasional use of its features.”

- QI Macros SPC Add-in for Excel Review, Ganta R.

6. eviews 

Users liked how eviews is easy to use and offers a straightforward interface. This ease of use helps you quickly become proficient in performing statistical analysis and econometric modeling, which is critical for those in economics and finance.

This statistical analysis software offers a wide range of tools for econometrics, from time series analysis to panel data methods, making it a versatile option for data analysis in the social sciences. Its ability to conduct advanced modeling and statistical tests on large datasets and complex econometric models impressed several reviewers.

I’ve seen G2 users highlight EViews for its ability to generate clear and concise graphs, charts, and tables that make complex data easier to interpret. Many reviewers say these visual tools are especially useful for presenting findings in academic papers, reports, and professional publications.

Another thing I noticed is how often users appreciate the available learning resources. The platform offers tutorials, manuals, and access to an active user community, which several reviewers mention has helped them troubleshoot issues or get quick answers to specific questions.

eviews

I’ve seen G2 reviewers mention that EViews’ scripting language is especially useful for automating repetitive tasks and analyses. It’s commonly used when working with large datasets or running recurring workflows, and many users say it helps simplify processes and boost productivity.

That said, there are a few limitations that come up. While the interface is generally user-friendly, I’ve noticed some users feel it lacks flexibility. You can’t easily tailor the layout to your preferences, which can be mildly frustrating over time.

Another drawback is the reliance on add-ons for advanced features. I came across reviews where users mentioned needing to install additional components to unlock certain capabilities—often at an extra cost. This added step was viewed as inconvenient, especially for those expecting a more all-in-one solution.

EViews also seems best suited for economic and time-series analysis. Several reviewers pointed out that it doesn’t offer the broader statistical tools needed for machine learning or large-scale data analysis across other industries, which limits its use outside of its core domain.

What I like about eviews:

  • I’ve seen G2 reviewers consistently praise EViews for its straightforward interface and ease of use. It allows users to quickly perform statistical analysis and econometric modeling without a steep learning curve.
  • Another thing I noticed is how often users highlight the variety of econometric tools available. From time series analysis to panel data methods, EViews offers a solid toolkit for advanced modeling. Reviewers also mention that it handles large datasets well, making it a reliable choice for complex data analysis tasks.

What I like about eviews:

“eviews offers a comprehensive set of econometric tools and techniques, allowing users to perform various statistical analyses, time series modeling, forecasting, and data manipulation tasks”

- eviews Review, Maliha A.
What I dislike about eviews:
  • Users dislike that eViews' interface isn’t customizable to their preferences. While the default layout works, they found the lack of flexibility a bit limiting.
  • I’ve seen G2 users express frustration over the need for additional add-ons to access advanced features. It’s inconvenient, and having to pay extra for full functionality can be disappointing, especially when those features are essential for more complex analysis.
What G2 users dislike about eviews:

“eviews lacks robust visualization capabilities, meaning users must rely on other software to create more detailed graphs, plots, and visualizations to effectively present their data and results.”

- eviews Review, Deepak S.

7. OriginPro

OriginPro offers an impressive array of features for various fields, including chemistry, biology, and engineering. Its capability to perform detailed statistical tests, regression analysis, and multivariate analysis is especially valuable for professionals in research and academia.

G2 reviewers frequently mention that OriginPro provides a well-rounded solution for data analysis, visualization, and reporting. Despite offering a wide range of features, users say the platform remains intuitive and approachable, even during implementation.

One of the most praised aspects of OriginPro is its data visualization capabilities. I’ve seen multiple users highlight its ability to create high-quality, publication-ready graphs, charts, and plots. The platform supports a variety of formats—including 2D and 3D graphs, contour plots, and heatmaps—making it easier to represent complex datasets visually and with precision.

Modeling and curve fitting are also areas where OriginPro stands out. G2 reviewers in fields like physics, chemistry, and engineering often note how the software simplifies the process of fitting data to predefined or custom mathematical models. With both linear and nonlinear fitting options, users say they’re able to handle specialized tasks with a high degree of flexibility.

I also noticed several users appreciating the platform’s built-in scripting support for LabTalk and Python. This functionality helps automate workflows, especially for those working with large datasets or running statistical analysis across multiple projects. Being able to write custom scripts directly within the software adds a layer of efficiency that’s often missing in other platforms.

originpro
Users experienced that OriginPro sometimes contains bugs or has compatibility issues with certain versions of the software. This can lead to crashes or unexpected behavior, disrupting work and causing frustration. 

I've also found through the reviews that exporting data or results from OriginPro can be limiting, as the software doesn't always provide the most fluid export functionality. It can be difficult to export data or graphs into formats that are compatible with other tools or presentation formats. This lack of flexibility in export options has been frustrating for users, especially when they need to share their results or collaborate with others who use different software.

Although OriginPro offers many powerful features, its integration with Excel isn't as seamless. Users often rely on Excel for initial data entry and processing, but transferring data from Excel to OriginPro can be cumbersome.

What I like about OriginPro:

  • I’ve seen G2 reviewers consistently praise OriginPro’s data visualization capabilities. The software allows users to create high-quality, publication-ready charts, graphs, and plots, which is especially helpful when working with complex datasets.
  • Another thing I noticed is the appreciation for built-in scripting support. With LabTalk and Python, many users say they’re able to automate processes and run complex analyses more efficiently, saving time across larger projects.

What I like about OriginPro:

“I have used Originpro extensively for 10+ years, it is great for data organization, visualization, and analysis. We use it to make figures, analyze imaging and electrophysiology data. It has great graphing tool to make publication quality figures and very good curve fitting tools.”

- OriginPro Review, Moritz A.
What I dislike about OriginPro:
  • User feedback suggests that OriginPro can sometimes have bugs or compatibility issues, which can lead to crashes or unexpected behavior.
  • The export functionality is somewhat limiting, and users often struggle to export data or graphs into formats that work smoothly with other tools or presentation formats.
What G2 users dislike about OriginPro:

“The lack of fluid export functionality into formats easily edited in Illustrator (or other vector-based design programs) limits functionality, with each available type of export (SVG, EPS, EMF) each offering pros and cons in terms of final control over data editing to make schemes and figures that combine data with other graphical information (for example, chemical structures).”

- OriginPro Review, Verified User in Higher Education

8. Posit

Posit excels at allowing seamless integration with R, one of the most commonly used programming languages for statistical analysis. This makes it a powerful tool for data scientists who rely on R for various analyses, from simple statistical methods to complex machine learning models.

One of the things I’ve seen G2 reviewers highlight most about Posit is its open-source nature. Users appreciate being able to access powerful statistical and analysis tools without paying licensing fees. This makes it especially appealing for individuals, academic researchers, and smaller organizations with limited budgets. I also came across several mentions of its rich ecosystem, plugins, libraries, and user-driven improvements continue to enhance Posit’s usability and flexibility over time.

Its cloud-based design is another frequently praised feature. Reviewers like that they can work from anywhere with an internet connection, which supports remote access and makes collaboration much easier. Instead of dealing with file sharing, teams can work dynamically in the same environment.

I’ve also seen strong feedback around Posit’s documentation and community support. Users mention that the clear, step-by-step guides make it easier to troubleshoot issues without getting stuck. Many find the community itself to be a helpful resource, with contributors regularly offering solutions to common problems.

Posit

One drawback I’ve seen mentioned in G2 reviews is how frequently Posit requires updates. While regular updates are important for security and performance, users often find them disruptive. I came across reviews noting that certain updates forced session restarts, which interrupted workflows. There’s also concern that new updates can occasionally introduce bugs or compatibility issues, temporarily impacting stability.

Despite Posit’s generally strong performance, I noticed several reviewers mentioning occasional crashes, particularly when handling large datasets or running complex computations. These crashes can cause data loss and interrupt analysis, which is especially frustrating during time-sensitive projects. While the cloud-based setup offers some recovery options, it’s still a concern for high-stakes use cases.

Support for other programming languages like Python or Julia is another area where Posit feels limited. I’ve seen users mention that although workarounds exist, the native functionality for non-R languages doesn’t feel as robust, which can be a drawback for teams that rely on multi-language environments.

What I like about Posit:

  • Users love how Posit integrates so smoothly with R, one of the most commonly used languages for statistical analysis. It makes conducting everything from basic stats to complex machine learning models much more efficient.
  • I’ve seen G2 reviewers appreciate that Posit is open source, which means they can access its full range of powerful features without paying for licensing. It’s often highlighted as a great option for individuals or small organizations working with limited budgets.

What G2 users like about Posit:

“Posit is so user-friendly and easily accessible, and their product RStudio is excellent. We can do anything like data pre-processing, analysis, model building, and visualization with it literally.”

- Posit Review, Samrit P.
What I dislike about Posit:
  • While I understand the importance of regular updates, I’ve seen G2 users mention that they can be disruptive and time-consuming. Some updates require restarting sessions, which interrupts workflows, and occasionally introduce bugs or compatibility issues that affect stability.
  • Crashes during large dataset handling or complex computations also come up in reviews. Even though the cloud-based recovery helps in some cases, users still find it concerning.
What G2 users dislike about Posit:

“It must provide inbuilt training on how to use tools more efficiently rather than depending on external sources. Also, the performance is slow when dealing with huge datasets.”

- Posit Review, Praveen K.

Statistical analysis software: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

1. Which is the best software to conduct statistical data analysis?

The best software for statistical data analysis depends on your needs. R and Python are ideal for advanced users and flexibility. SPSS and Stata are more user-friendly but often come at a cost. SAS is great for large datasets and enterprise-level analysis.

2. Which software is mostly used by data analysts?

Data analysts commonly use Excel for basic analysis and Python or R for more complex tasks. Tableau and Power BI are also popular for data visualization.

3. Is Excel a statistical analysis software?

Excel is not specifically a statistical analysis software but offers basic statistical functions like mean, median, standard deviation, and regression. It's often used for simpler data analysis tasks and quick visualizations. Specialized software like R or SPSS is typically preferred for more advanced statistics. However, Excel can be a helpful tool for those without advanced statistical software.

4. What is the best free statistical analysis software?

Based on my evaluation, Posit, JMP, and Minitab are among the best free statistical analysis software options. You can also try IBM SPSS Statistics for free.

5. What is the best statistical analysis software for students?

For students, R is often the best choice due to its free, open-source nature and extensive learning resources. Python is also great for those exploring data science and machine learning. SPSS and JMP offer student discounts and user-friendly interfaces. Excel is useful for basic analysis and quick tasks.

The power of the right statistical analysis software

Looking back on my journey from high school statistics to handling complex datasets in college, I can honestly say the right statistical analysis software makes a huge difference. Early on, I didn’t realize how much I’d rely on these tools, but as the data got bigger and the analyses more complicated, I quickly saw their value. 

After evaluating various software options with data professionals, I learned that the right tool makes complex tasks more manageable and accurate. It’s about finding the one that fits your needs, whether you're just starting or working on advanced projects. From user-friendly interfaces to powerful analytics and compatibility with different data formats, the right software removes the headache. With the right tool, you can focus less on the technical side and more on making sense of the numbers to uncover the insights that matter.

Not sure how to maintain strong datasets? Learn the best practices to organize your data


Get this exclusive AI content editing guide.

By downloading this guide, you are also subscribing to the weekly G2 Tea newsletter to receive marketing news and trends. You can learn more about G2's privacy policy here.