I Found 9 Field Service Management Tools To Be The Most Valuable

On a busy Tuesday morning, the office printer jammed, causing a backlog of tasks and frustration across departments. The IT team scrambled to resolve the issue, and it took hours to get the machine back online.

That got me thinking—how do field service teams, equipment managers, and businesses that rely on constant machine uptime manage maintenance and service issues more effectively? That’s when I began exploring the best field service management software.

I dove into G2 reviews, researched several platforms, and tested different software solutions to understand how they streamline field service operations. What I discovered was more than just scheduling, it’s about improving customer satisfaction, optimizing workforce efficiency, and ensuring timely responses to service requests.

If you’re searching for the best field service management software, keep reading. I’ll share insights to help you make the right choice for your business.

My top 9 best field service management software recommendations for 2025

The best field service management software simplifies job scheduling, technician dispatch, and customer communication. While evaluating G2 reviews for these tools, I saw how they boost efficiency, reduce delays, and turn reactive service into a proactive, streamlined operation.

What makes field service management software worth it: my opinion

• Manage various types of assets and equipment across multiple locations
• Track inventory for spare parts and materials needed for maintenance
• Schedule maintenance activities such as inspections, repairs, and upgrades
• Manage resources (human and equipment) and allocate them to maintenance operations
• Deliver reports on asset utilization, maintenance costs, and technician productivity
• Ensure asset compliance with safety and environmental regulations
• Provide a mobile-friendly interface or mobile apps for field service technicians

This data was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews have been edited for clarity.

1. Salesforce Field Service

Salesforce Field Service is a comprehensive solution designed to streamline field operations, especially for teams managing high volumes of service appointments.

Based on my review of G2 user feedback, this tool stands out for its ability to intelligently schedule and assign tasks based on technician availability, skills, and location. I frequently see G2 reviewers highlight how this feature helps reduce delays and makes daily service coordination more efficient.

Another commonly appreciated element is the native integration with Sales Cloud and Service Cloud. From what I’ve gathered in user reviews, this unified setup enables teams to access customer history, case details, and work orders in one place. G2 users often praise this for helping reduce miscommunication and making client interactions more informed and responsive.

Across multiple reviews, I’ve noticed users mention that the interface is intuitive and well-suited for various roles, from dispatchers to service managers. While some initial orientation is necessary, once users get accustomed, many find the system easy to navigate. A number of G2 reviewers also call out the responsiveness of Salesforce’s support team, especially during implementation and early workflow configurations.

That said, I’ve come across noticeable dissatisfaction around the platform’s learning curve. Smaller businesses or teams with limited technical resources seem to struggle the most. Many users on G2 point out that it takes time and considerable training to master the more advanced features, which can slow down the onboarding process.

Another recurring theme in reviews involves connectivity challenges in low-signal areas. I’ve read multiple reviewers mention struggles with app performance when offline or in remote locations. This slows down work in the field and creates frustration among technicians who rely on real-time access to job details.

There’s also feedback around support delays for heavily customized instances. According to feedback I gathered from G2 users, when organizations modify workflows extensively, getting timely assistance can become tricky. In several cases, users noted needing multiple follow-ups to resolve issues. Still, once the right support personnel were involved, response times did improve.

What I dislike about Salesforce Field Service:

• I’ve come across repeated mentions of a steep learning curve, particularly for small businesses or teams with limited technical resources.
• Many G2 users express frustration with the app’s performance in areas with poor connectivity, which affects field operations.

What G2 users dislike about Salesforce Field Service:

"The Field Service app would benefit from having its settings separated more clearly from the main Salesforce app to avoid confusion. Additionally, the 'Guided Setup' experience—with its service-specific menus—can be disorienting for users who are already accustomed to manually navigating setup options in other Salesforce projects."

- Salesforce Field Service Review, Dominik M.

2. Connecteam

Connecteam is often described as a flexible, user-friendly workforce management platform that adapts well to different scheduling and operational needs.

From what I’ve seen in G2 reviews, users frequently highlight how easy it is to build and manage shift schedules, even for teams with varying roles and complex shift patterns. A commonly appreciated element is that the platform feels intuitive to both managers and employees, with minimal onboarding required.

One feature that I see getting a lot of praise is the customizability of workflows and settings. According to feedback I gathered from G2 users, teams can easily tailor permissions, communication tools, and scheduling options to suit specific departments. This flexibility supports smoother rollouts and faster adoption, particularly for organizations managing multiple teams or locations. Many reviewers note that they could configure the system without needing deep technical support.

There’s a lot of love for how this tool handles customer support and in-app assistance. I’ve noticed that G2 reviewers often mention positive experiences with Connecteam’s responsive support team. One standout capability, according to users, is the AI chat assistant, which doesn’t just provide canned responses—it actually interprets user intent and offers context-aware guidance, reducing reliance on live agents.

That said, negative feedback tends to focus on quirks within the scheduling functionality. I’ve read multiple reviewers mention that shift updates can behave unpredictably, such as auto-adjusting shifts or lagging when changes are made. While not a deal-breaker, these inconsistencies seem to cause momentary confusion, especially during peak scheduling times.

A consistent theme in G2 reviews that I’ve noticed is frustration with notification overload. By default, Connecteam sends out frequent alerts, which can become overwhelming if not adjusted. I’ve come across several users who felt the need to manually tweak notification settings just to prevent spamming their teams—something they felt should be easier or more intuitive to control from the start.

Finally, there’s noticeable dissatisfaction around Time Off policy customization. Many users on G2 point out the lack of granularity when setting individual policies. I’ve seen some users express frustration with creating multiple workaround policies just to account for different employee needs. This not only adds clutter but also introduces complexity to what could be a streamlined process.

What I dislike about Connecteam:

• I’ve come across complaints about unpredictable behavior in the scheduling tool, like shifts auto-adjusting or lagging.
• I’ve noticed several users express frustration with the lack of detailed control when customizing Time Off policies.

What G2 users dislike about Connecteam:

- Connecteam Review, Sheila M.

3. Field Nation

Based on my review of G2 user feedback, Field Nation is widely recognized as a dependable platform for managing field service operations.

A consistent theme I’ve noticed in user reviews is how essential it becomes for daily operations, especially when it comes to sourcing and coordinating service providers. One feature that I see getting frequent praise is the responsiveness of Field Nation’s support team. Across multiple reviews, users highlight that support is not only quick to respond but genuinely helpful when it comes to job postings, communication challenges, or platform navigation.

Another standout capability, according to users, is the advanced filtering and sorting options within the service provider portal. G2 reviewers often mention that it’s easy to search for technicians based on criteria like skillset, location, rating, and availability. This functionality helps streamline the provider selection process and ensures more accurate job matches across different service types and regions.

Something G2 reviewers seem to really appreciate is the real-time photo upload feature for service providers. Whether it’s progress updates or proof of completion, users mention that these images are key for maintaining transparency and ensuring quality, especially when managing remote teams or escalating support issues.

A commonly appreciated element is Field Nation’s historical job tracking and documentation. From what I’ve seen, users rely on the platform’s organized job history, notes, and images to address repeat issues or handle warranty claims. This access to detailed past records is a consistent benefit highlighted in reviews.

That said, I’ve come across noticeable dissatisfaction around the variability of technician performance due to their independent contractor status. G2 users frequently note that while many providers are reliable, enforcing quality standards can be challenging, especially under time-sensitive conditions or when onboarding new technicians.

Many users on G2 also point out the inability to assign internal ratings to subcontracted technicians. Negative feedback tends to focus on the fact that, while a provider may complete work under a third-party arrangement, there’s no way to retain performance history within the platform. This creates gaps in long-term oversight and makes it harder to track or avoid underperforming providers in the future.

What I dislike about Field Nation:

• I’ve noticed recurring frustration with inconsistent technician quality, primarily since most providers work as independent contractors.
• I’ve come across reviews mentioning the lack of internal rating tools, which makes it harder to track subcontractor performance over the long term.

What G2 users dislike about Field Nation:

"The only downside is that, occasionally, a technician may not meet quality standards, and the only way to identify this is after sending them. However, this is rare, and the ratings system helps avoid such mistakes."

- Field Nation Review, Giuseppe A.

4. Jobber

Based on my review of G2 user feedback, Jobber's intuitive design is often praised for its ease of use. Multiple reviewers mention how the platform requires minimal training and support, allowing businesses to get up and running quickly without unnecessary headaches.

One feature that stands out in user feedback is client and property management. From what I've seen, users frequently highlight how simple it is to add new customers and properties, both in the office and on the go. The ability to quickly access client details has helped businesses stay responsive and efficient, a sentiment echoed across G2 reviews.

I’ve also noticed strong positive feedback around Jobber’s scheduling functionality, especially the fast, visual interface. Many G2 reviewers appreciate how the platform reduces mistakes and no-shows, which is a significant plus for businesses with high scheduling demands. Additionally, users consistently mention how well Jobber integrates with QuickBooks, making financial tracking seamless and improving bookkeeping as businesses scale.

Another aspect that gets a lot of praise is payment processing and quote management. Jobber has streamlined these processes, allowing users to handle payments and generate quotes directly through the platform. This feature seems to be highly valued, with reviewers noting that it eliminates the need for multiple systems, creating a centralized hub for client communication and financial transactions.

However, I’ve come across noticeable dissatisfaction around Jobber’s lack of optimization for HVAC businesses with maintenance agreements. From what I’ve seen, users in this space often mention having to create workarounds to handle service contracts, which adds unnecessary complexity. This feedback seems to be a common pain point for businesses looking for a more straightforward approach to managing service agreements.

Another feature that some G2 reviewers have pointed out as lacking is the inability to add tips during payment processing. Many users, especially those in industries where clients might want to reward outstanding service, have expressed frustration over this absence. It’s a small but significant feature that could make a big difference in improving the overall customer experience.

Lastly, a consistent theme in G2 reviews is the need for employee tagging functionality. Multiple users have mentioned how the lack of this feature limits how well they can use Jobber’s online booking tool and AI receptionist. With employee tagging, businesses could automate and personalize the booking process further, which seems like a highly requested enhancement.

What I dislike about Jobber:

• I’ve noticed dissatisfaction from G2 users in HVAC businesses who struggle with creating workarounds for maintenance agreements due to a lack of optimization for service contracts.
• I’ve come across multiple reviews mentioning frustration with the inability to add tips during payment processing, particularly for industries where tipping is important for service quality recognition.

What G2 users dislike about Jobber:

"My least favorite thing about Jobber is that it doesn’t have a basic call log entry page. I’d like it to capture the date, client’s first and last name, phone number, email, address, and a section for notes on the reason for the call and where the client got our number. It would be great if this could be in an easy-to-use form that feeds into a list, like Excel, for quick access and review. Right now, I have this set up in Excel, but it would be amazing if it could integrate directly into Jobber and automatically create a new client with all the details."

- Jobber Review, Kristi S.

5. Housecall Pro

Housecall Pro is often highlighted for its user-friendly interface and quick implementation, which is especially beneficial for small business owners.

Many G2 reviewers appreciate how intuitive the design is, making it easy for anyone to get up and running without needing extensive training. This ease of use is invaluable, as it reduces the time spent onboarding new users.

A commonly appreciated element in reviews is the price book setup and the ease of processing credit and debit card payments. From what I’ve seen, many users, especially small business owners, really like how simple it is to track job and customer information through tags. There’s also a lot of praise for the ability to track lead sources, making it easier to assess marketing effectiveness and optimize strategies.

However, I’ve noticed that reporting capabilities are a common point of frustration. While G2 users acknowledge that reports have improved, multiple reviewers have mentioned the inability to track commissions on specific services as a notable drawback. This lack of granularity seems to be a recurring issue for those in industries where commission tracking is critical.

Another recurring theme in user feedback is the inability to apply discounts to individual line items or easily add tips for checks in a way that integrates seamlessly with QuickBooks. I’ve encountered several reviewers who find this limitation inconvenient, as it adds extra steps to manual processes.

I’ve also read multiple reviewers mention bugs with photo uploading on the mobile app. While the app works well most of the time, there’s noticeable dissatisfaction with inconsistent performance in uploading photos, which seems to be a major point of frustration for many users.

What I dislike about Housecall Pro:

• I’ve come across multiple reviews mentioning frustration with limited reporting capabilities, particularly around commission tracking.
• I’ve noticed dissatisfaction with photo uploading bugs in the mobile app, which many users find inconsistent.

What G2 users dislike about Housecall Pro:

"The app can be a bit 'glitchy' and sometimes doesn’t perform all the functions it should. There are small nuances I’d like to see improved, such as making the 'copy to job' function for approved estimates a one-click option in the pipeline. However, most of my dislikes are just personal preferences. I’ve also noticed that some integrations or add-ons are being offered, which seem like extras, and these are being pushed pretty heavily through pop-ups and emails. Despite this, for what we need and do, we’re very happy with HCP."

- Housecall Pro Review, Jeff L.

6. FieldPulse

What I dislike about FieldPulse:

• I’ve come across several G2 reviews expressing frustration with FieldPulse’s fleet tracking feature, particularly due to implementation issues and slow resolution of troubleshooting cases.
• I’ve seen G2 users share dissatisfaction with the platform’s CRM tools, pointing out missing functionalities like email tracking, flexible reminders, and calendar integrations that limit efficiency.

What G2 users dislike about FieldPulse:

"The current downsides are areas that could be improved or modified based on user feedback. For example, having the same tags across all tabs without needing to manually create them each time would be beneficial. Additionally, a desktop app for the Engage side would be very useful. If you don’t have the window open, you have to locate it to answer the call."

- FieldPulse Review, Rachel S.

7. ServiceTitan

A standout feature consistently praised by users is ServiceTitan’s marketing and price-book customization tools. Multiple reviewers have mentioned how easy it is to build targeted campaigns and dynamically adjust pricing across service categories. This has helped businesses upsell more effectively and retain customers by personalizing offerings at scale, clearly giving them a competitive advantage.

Another theme I’ve picked up on is the high quality of support and success management. Given how comprehensive the platform is, having responsive and strategic guidance has been a significant plus for many users. According to reviews, the ServiceTitan team doesn’t just solve problems—they help businesses plan for future success by offering proactive advice and best practices.

Mobile access also gets a lot of positive mentions. Managers especially appreciate real-time operational visibility from anywhere, whether checking on schedules, job statuses, or client communications. That flexibility has helped teams stay connected and in control—even when they’re not at their desks.

That said, G2 reviews do frequently flag the initial setup process as a major hurdle. ServiceTitan’s capabilities are vast, but that power comes with complexity. Users often report that getting everything configured takes serious time and effort, making it challenging to juggle implementation with day-to-day operations.

There’s also a noticeable learning curve. Several reviewers admit that while the platform pays off in the long run, onboarding was intense and adoption took time,  especially for teams without dedicated tech support or training resources.

One issue that repeatedly arises is related to frequent software updates introducing bugs. While many users appreciate that ServiceTitan evolves rapidly, they’ve also expressed frustration over new features occasionally disrupting workflows due to unresolved glitches. Reviewers suggest that faster resolution times and better testing could go a long way in maintaining a smooth experience.

What I dislike about ServiceTitan:

• A common complaint I’ve read in G2 reviews is the steep learning curve. Users say the initial setup is complex and time-consuming, which can slow down adoption, especially for smaller teams.
• I’ve noticed G2 reviewers often mention that frequent updates sometimes introduce bugs, disrupt workflows, and highlight the need for more thorough testing and quicker fixes.

What G2 users dislike about ServiceTitan:

"The most challenging part is getting all of the data entered into ServiceTitan so it can be used effectively. It could almost become a full-time job to enter data, build campaigns, and pull reports. While ServiceTitan is easy to use, it’s also a growing and evolving platform, which makes it challenging to keep up with the updates. The YouTube videos are helpful, but there’s still much to stay on top of."

- ServiceTitan Review, Tony S..

8. ServiceMax

Based on user reviews on G2, ServiceMax is highly valued for its strong implementation support and collaborative approach.

Many users mention that the ServiceMax team consistently shows up with profound product knowledge and a clear understanding of business goals, whether it's a major rollout or a minor project enhancement. This level of partnership has helped companies navigate even complex implementations smoothly.

One of the standout points from G2 feedback is how receptive the ServiceMax product team is to user input. Multiple reviewers highlight that their feature requests weren’t just acknowledged—they were often implemented. This gave customers the sense that they contributed to the platform’s evolution, rather than simply using a static tool.

The platform’s customizable templates and intuitive user interface are also frequently called out. Users find it easy to create polished, branded documents like quotes, which streamlines client communication and saves valuable time. The clean, natural navigation also helps teams onboard quickly and reduces friction in everyday use.

When it comes to operations, ServiceMax’s scheduling tools have clearly impacted efficiency. G2 reviewers appreciate features like automated reminders, crew availability tracking, and schedule optimization. These tools have reduced manual coordination and helped eliminate common scheduling bottlenecks.

That said, there are still some pain points. A recurring issue raised by reviewers is the inability to pass two overlapping events in the payload’s event section. This limitation can make it difficult to accurately log concurrent tasks in real-world field scenarios, affecting operational clarity.

Another common drawback is the lack of detailed change log visibility at the individual order level. While change tracking exists, users find it difficult to investigate order-specific modifications, which poses challenges during audits or when resolving discrepancies.

Lastly, reviewers point to gaps in the dashboard experience. Many users say they want stronger monitoring tools, particularly for tracking platform events and transactional data. A more robust dashboard would help them troubleshoot and analyze system activity more effectively.

What I dislike about ServiceMax:

• One drawback I’ve noticed in reviews is the platform’s handling of overlapping events—users mention the inability to log concurrent tasks clearly, which can reduce operational visibility in the field.
• G2 users also frequently call out limitations in the platform’s dashboards and change logs, saying they need better tools to track platform events and monitor order-specific changes for auditing and troubleshooting.

What G2 users dislike about ServiceMax:

"The end-user experience is good, but the development tools can be a bit awkward and clunky. The migration tool could be more granular and specific, and the Wizards could benefit from a more consistent look and feel. However, as IT professionals, we’re able to figure it out and get the job done."

- ServiceMax Review, Troy S.

9. Zuper

Based on my review of G2 user feedback, Zuper is often praised as a powerful and flexible Field Service Management (FSM) platform that helps streamline various workflows.

From dispatching to invoicing, many users appreciate the system's ability to improve efficiency, organization, and scalability, which is particularly useful for growing businesses. A common theme in reviews is that the platform supports day-to-day operations, making tasks feel more organized and efficient.

One feature that I see getting a lot of praise is the integration with Zoho CRM. G2 users frequently highlight this as a significant advantage, allowing teams to view and manage jobs, schedules, and customer data in one centralized location. This integration seems to simplify the user experience, making daily processes smoother and reducing the need for multiple systems. Additionally, G2 reviewers often mention how intuitive the interface is, enabling teams to quickly adopt the platform without much training.

Something G2 reviewers seem to really appreciate is the dedicated support provided by Zuper’s account managers. I’ve noticed that users frequently mention the responsiveness and proactive nature of the support team, which adds a layer of satisfaction to their overall experience. Many reviews specifically reference how account managers like Jahanwi go above and beyond to offer technical assistance and guidance, making the transition to Zuper smoother.

However, I’ve come across noticeable dissatisfaction around the mobile app’s syncing functionality. Several users have expressed frustration with minor delays in syncing, particularly with job statuses. While this issue doesn't appear to be widespread, it has been flagged by multiple reviewers. Users in areas with limited internet access are particularly affected, and there's a recurring suggestion to enhance offline functionality and real-time syncing to improve the experience for those on the go.

Looking at the broader review trends, the lack of a geolocator map is another point often mentioned by G2 users. Many users wish for this feature, as it would allow them to see customer locations visually when planning service routes. Many reviews highlight how useful this feature could be, especially for those traveling or managing service areas across larger regions.

Based on feedback I gathered from G2 users, there's consistent feedback on the lack of unified numbering across jobs, quotes, and invoices. A recurring theme in reviews is that users would benefit from having a consistent reference number across all elements tied to a job, as this would simplify tracking and reduce confusion during reconciliation. Many reviewers suggest that this improvement would save time and help streamline internal processes.

In conclusion, while Zuper is generally well-received for its powerful functionality and customer support, there are clear areas where improvements could be made to enhance the overall user experience, particularly regarding syncing issues, route planning, and unified numbering.

What I dislike about Zuper:

• A common frustration is the mobile app’s syncing functionality. Users note delays in updating job statuses, particularly in areas with limited internet access. There’s a call for better offline functionality and real-time syncing.
• Another recurring point of dissatisfaction is the lack of a geo-locator map, which would help users visually track customer locations and improve service route planning.

"Because the system offers so many features, it can be overwhelming to decide where to focus. The Zuper team has been patient as we gradually migrate features, ensuring that our team fully understands each function."

- Zuper Review, Rikki B.

Field service management software: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

1. Is FSM software cloud-based or on-premises?

FSM software can be either cloud-based or on-premises. Cloud-based FSM software is more common and offers flexibility, scalability, and remote access. It’s easier to maintain and update, while on-premises solutions might offer greater customization but require more upfront investment and IT resources for maintenance.

2. Are there any good free FSM tools available?

Yes. Connecteam, Jotform, and Zuper offer free tiers or trials. They’re suitable for testing before scaling up to premium plans.

3. Can small businesses use best field service management software for free?

Yes, there are several free FSM software options available for small businesses. For example, Connecteam and Jotform offer free tiers suited for small teams. These typically come with basic features, such as scheduling, work order management, and limited integrations. 

4. Which field service management software is best for large teams?

Salesforce Field Service, ServiceTitan, and ServiceMax are strong choices. They offer advanced scheduling, real-time tracking, and enterprise-grade integrations.

5. What FSM software is ideal for medium-sized businesses?

Medium-sized businesses often need more advanced features than small businesses, but still seek cost-effective solutions. Some popular FSM software options for medium-sized businesses include ServiceTitan and Housecall Pro. These platforms offer a range of features like mobile apps for field technicians, customer tracking, and robust reporting without the high costs of enterprise-level solutions.

6. Can the best field service management software help reduce operational costs?

Yes, by streamlining scheduling, reducing fuel use with route optimization, and cutting paperwork. It also improves first-time fix rates and asset tracking, leading to lower overhead and better margins.

Not all heroes wear capes, some use FSM software

After testing and comparing today’s top field service management software, I’ve seen firsthand how much of a difference the right tool can make.

From automating dispatch to giving field technicians everything they need on their phones, these platforms are built to make service delivery smoother, faster, and more customer-friendly.

If you're looking for a way to scale your service operations without burning out your team, I hope my experience evaluating these tools helps you find the FSM tool that makes it all click. Because when your techs are empowered and your customers are happy, everything else falls into place.

Simplify maintenance scheduling and reduce downtime with industry-leading CMMS software.