By embracing a unified API, teams can centralize logic, smooth over inconsistencies, and cut down integration launch time, turning API maintenance from a bottleneck into a competitive edge.
October 1, 2025
by Shreya Mattoo / October 1, 2025
For IT teams, juggling dozens of APIs is like spinning plates — one slip and the whole integration stack comes crashing down.
Developers face constant roadblocks: SDK quirks, JSON inconsistencies, unpredictable middleware, and shifting rate limits.
From ensuring integrations can be reused across projects to interpreting complex JSON structures, every step adds to the workload. But unified API changes that.
By implementing a unified API, developers can smooth out backend models, offer field-level data integration, and securely handle incoming data so integrations perform consistently under all conditions
If you need to monitor, secure, and optimize these connections at scale, API management platforms can keep integrations consistent and data flowing reliably.
A unified API is a single interface that allows developers to access and integrate data or functions from multiple applications or services through one consistent set of endpoints. It simplifies integration by standardizing authentication, requests, and responses across diverse platforms and APIs.
Managing API integrations can be stressful. While we may think it's easy, it results in usage rate limit issues, SDK shortfalls, and uneven data payloads on the IT infrastructure.
71% of organizations take at least three weeks to launch a single integration, a delay that slows onboarding and risks losing potential customers
By embracing a unified API, teams can centralize logic, smooth over inconsistencies, and cut down integration launch time, turning API maintenance from a bottleneck into a competitive edge.
Delivering and maintaining integrations across multiple tools can consume months of developer time and pull resources away from other critical projects.
Unified APIs emerged to address these pain points by standardizing how integrations are built, authenticated, and maintained.
A unified API eliminates much of this repetitive, error-prone work by introducing a consistent abstraction layer. Thus, it helps teams scale their integration roadmap without scaling their engineering workload.
Unified API works like a universal translator. Your app speaks one language, and the unified API instantly converts it into the correct format for each connected service
Instead of coding directly to each CRM, accounting tool, or ad platform, you build once to the unified API, then it handles the mapping and routing to each connected service.
Source: Activants
Unified APIs are almost always built around categories, because applications within a category share similar data models. CRMs, accounting tools, HR systems, and marketing automation platforms are good fits since they revolve around common objects like “Contact,” “Invoice,” or “Campaign.”
By contrast, mixing unrelated tools (say, a CRM and an accounting app) rarely works well. Beyond a shared “Customer” record, the overlap is minimal, and the abstraction loses value. That’s why vendors typically provide separate unified APIs per category, one for CRM, one for accounting, one for HRIS, and so on. The more overlap within a category, the more powerful the unified API becomes.
Imagine your customers want your product to integrate with several CRMs: Salesforce, HubSpot, Dynamics, and Pipedrive. Each CRM has its own idea of what a “contact” is called and how it’s structured:
| CRM platform | Native object name | Notable variations in data fields |
| HubSpot | Contact | firstName, lastName, Company |
| Salesforce | Lead / Contact | Separate objects for potential vs. existing customers |
| Pipedrive | Prospect | Stores company data in a separate linked record for easier organization and retrieval |
| Dynamics | Contact | Often excludes extensive metadata fields |
With a unified standard API, your application calls the standardized "contact" object, maps that request to the correct object in the chosen CRM, and normalizes field names and data formats so your app can work with a single, consistent schema.
This not only saves engineering teams from re-learning every API’s quirks but also reduces the risk of data mismatches and errors.
Choosing the right integration approach often comes down to speed, flexibility, and depth of functionality. Here’s a quick side-by-side to help you compare.
| Approach | Pros | Cons |
| Unified API |
|
|
| iPaaS |
|
|
If speed and standardized functionality are your priority, a unified API is often the better fit. If you need extensive customization and multi-category coverage, iPaaS may deliver more long-term flexibility.
Unified APIs provide multiple benefits to engineering teams that need to ship and maintain dozens of integrations.
In short, unified APIs free engineering teams from repetitive integration work, letting them move faster, scale wider, and focus on building differentiated features.
While unified APIs provide the benefits shared above, they are limited by certain structural challenges that can affect flexibility.
Workarounds: Certain providers created the ability to make "pass-through" requests to the underlying API. However, today's implementation often feel clunky to work with and can frustrate developers trying to deliver complex functionality.
Choosing between a unified API and other integration approaches often comes down to how standardized your needs are. Use this quick checklist to see if a unified API is the right fit for your team:
If you checked all four boxes, a unified API is worth evaluating; it could dramatically speed up your integration launches and reduce ongoing maintenance.
If you missed even one, an embedded integration platform might be the better choice, offering deeper vendor-specific capabilities and more robust operational tooling.
Even with a unified API smoothing over vendor quirks, teams still need a reliable way to monitor traffic, enforce policies, and keep integrations performant.
G2 helps teams find the best API management platforms for securing requests, monitoring performance, and maintaining stable integrations at scale.
Below are the five best API management tools, based on G2’s Fall 2025 Grid Report.
To see how a unified API works in practice, let’s walk through the process of integrating three popular CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive, into a single application.
This approach allowed the team to deliver a multi-CRM integration faster, with fewer resources, and without compromising data consistency.
While unified APIs simplify integration, they also introduce unique security considerations that teams should evaluate before committing to a vendor.
Security in unified APIs is a shared responsibility. The vendor must protect the data in transit and at rest, and your team must ensure that access is appropriate, transparent, and clearly communicated to customers.
Done right, you can offer the benefits of faster integrations without compromising trust.
When assessing a unified API provider, look for proof of compliance (SOC 2, ISO 27001), detailed documentation of encryption practices, and clear scope control in authentication flows.
Review their incident response process and ensure they have transparent data handling policies, ideally with regular third-party security audits. Choosing a vendor with a mature security posture protects not only your data but also your customer trust.
Got more questions? We have the answers.
A unified API is a single integration layer that connects to multiple vendor APIs in the same category. You build once to its standardized schema, and it handles mapping, authentication, and routing requests to the correct underlying API.
They eliminate the need to build and maintain separate integrations for each vendor, reducing engineering workload and time-to-market. This lets teams expand their integration coverage faster and with fewer resources.
They only support features and fields common across all connected APIs. This means losing access to vendor-specific functionality, facing the lowest rate limits in the group, and relying on the vendor’s roadmap for new categories.
Unified APIs provide a single abstraction for similar APIs, ideal for standardized use cases. iPaaS platforms focus on connecting many systems through workflows and transformations, often with deeper customization but more complexity.
Usually not. Most unify only predefined objects and fields, so custom fields in an underlying API are often unsupported unless the vendor offers a passthrough or extension mechanism.
Popular examples include integrating multiple CRMs, HRIS systems, marketing automation tools, accounting platforms, and help desk software under one integration.
Security depends on the vendor’s practices. Look for SOC 2 or ISO certifications, strong encryption, and transparent data handling policies. You should also clearly communicate access scopes to your customers.
Use a unified API when your integrations are in supported categories, your use cases are highly standardizable, and speed to market matters. If you need deep, vendor-specific features, an embedded iPaaS or direct integration may be better.
The unified API market is evolving rapidly, with new players and capabilities emerging every year. You must ensure that it can address your use cases today and all possible use cases your customers may request in the future.
Unified APIs can be a great solution for shipping dozens of integrations with minimal effort, provided that the use cases your customers require are uniform across every integration within a given category.
It is a developing market with many new players and is certainly an interesting approach to solving the B2B SaaS integration challenge.
Explore G2’s top iPaaS tools for 2025 to centralize, monitor, and automate your integration workflows.
This article was originally published in 2023. It has been updated with new information.
Shreya Mattoo is a former Content Marketing Specialist at G2. She completed her Bachelor's in Computer Applications and is now pursuing Master's in Strategy and Leadership from Deakin University. She also holds an Advance Diploma in Business Analytics from NSDC. Her expertise lies in developing content around Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, Artificial intelligence, Machine Learning, Peer Review Code, and Development Software. She wants to spread awareness for self-assist technologies in the tech community. When not working, she is either jamming out to rock music, reading crime fiction, or channeling her inner chef in the kitchen.
No, it’s not the equivalent of a B-.
by Bridget Poetker
Coco Chanel once said, “Fashion changes, but style endures.”
by Mara Calvello
The world is going digital, and digital transformation has become the reality for many...
by Merlin Velankani
No, it’s not the equivalent of a B-.
by Bridget Poetker
Coco Chanel once said, “Fashion changes, but style endures.”
by Mara Calvello