You want to make an app, but you don’t know much about writing code.
If this is the case, you have two choices to help you create your app: low-code development and no-code development.
Low-code vs. no-code development
When the digital age was getting off the ground, this would’ve been a much greater issue. But, thanks to rapid application development (RAD), hopeful app developers are no longer held back by having no or limited coding knowledge. Low-code and no-code strategies give app developers a quicker, easier road to making an app for their businesses.
What is low-code development?
Low-code development may require a little bit of coding knowledge, but don’t let that dissuade you.
Low-code development definition
Low-code development is the creation of software, applications or databases primarily (but not always) through a graphical user interface (GUI), minimizing the amount of necessary programming knowledge. Low-code platforms allow users to view and edit source code, but they do not necessarily require users to access the code itself to create applications or databases.
If you want to develop in low-code, you’ll be using a low-code development platform, a type of visual integrated development environment (IDE). Low-code IDEs primarily employ visual components for assembling the application but also offer text editor components for modifying source code. The text editor is where you’ll need to take over with some prior code knowledge, since manipulating source code requires at least a basic understanding of what’s being changed.
What is no-code development?
No-code development is exactly what you'd expect.
No-code development definition
No-code development is the creation of software, applications or databases exclusively through a graphical user interface (GUI), eliminating any need for formal programming knowledge. No-code platforms disallow source code viewing or modification.
No-code development is the pinnacle of graphically driven development. Through a visual IDE called a no-code development platform, users can drag and drop features straight into an application framework. There’s no need to worry about code libraries or writing code. These features are usable either immediately or with only minor, non-code specifications (e.g., an application server address).
TIP: Download the following infographic to get a better understanding of the differences between low-code and no-code development.
Comparing low-code and no-code development
What we have here is like the old “squares and rectangles” situation in geometry. For the unfamiliar, all squares are rectangles. They have four sides, four right angles, and their opposite sides are of equal length. But, unlike other rectangles, squares have a specific property that sets them apart: all their sides are the same length. Because not all rectangles have sides of all the same length, not all rectangles are squares.
With that analogy, low-code and no-code platforms become easier to distinguish. All no-code development platforms are a type of low-code platform, since they drastically reduce the amount of code needed to produce an application. But, unlike other low-code platforms, no-code platforms require, well, no code to create a final product. So, not all low-code platforms are no-code.
Similarities between low-code and no-code development
What sets low-code and no-code platforms apart in the RAD (rapid application development) world is ease of use and speed of delivery – how quickly a company can develop and launch an application. Unlike other development platforms, low-code and no-code platforms are built for those with any, including no, development experience, meaning that even companies without in-house software developers can still create their own applications with ease. This is perfect for small and mid-size companies that may not have a formal development team but need their own app to be competitive.
A big factor in usability is that, as stated previously, low-code and no-code development is typically done in visual IDEs. They usually include templates and app skeletons to choose from, where users can then use selection menus or drag-and-drop functionality to add the features they need. Users simply choose what they want, make any brand adjustments they need, and launch the app. This simplicity improves speed of delivery.
Differences between low-code and no-code development
The difference between low-code and no-code isn’t subtle per se, but it’s easy enough to overlook that conflating low-code and no-code development is fairly common.
The difference is all about code access. Low-code lets users get into the source code and fiddle around, tweaking whatever they need to get the results they want. No-code development, in contrast, is exactly that: No coding is involved in development. No-code development doesn’t involve users getting into the nitty-gritty of the development experience, thus trading deeper customization for faster turnaround and easier user experience.
Depending on the development method, low-code and no-code tend to meet vastly different business needs. Hopping aboard the no-code train is ideal when users need to turn out a basic application in a short period of time. Applications built using no-code development aren’t supposed to involve heavy workloads or have extensive features. They’re the quick-and-dirty result of having to meet a basic need.
On the other hand, the low-code method can handle a greater, more diverse workload. Source code modification is a powerful ability, so don’t make the mistake of equating “rapid” with “limited.” Getting into the source code lets businesses better integrate the application with their other systems, as well as fine-tune the functionalities they want from the application. The result is a more extensive, all-encompassing application that can serve a wider range of needs.
Zack is a former G2 senior research analyst for IT and development software. He leveraged years of national and international vendor relations experience, working with software vendors of all markets and regions to improve product and market representation on G2, as well as built better cross-company relationships. Using authenticated review data, he analyzed product and competitor data to find trends in buyer/user preferences around software implementation, support, and functionality. This data enabled thought leadership initiatives around topics such as cloud infrastructure, monitoring, backup, and ITSM.