Performance reviews should be short or sweet, just like this article (I promise).
While employee performance reviews can be a smooth sail for employees, it is a rocky bend for employers.
Employers pack all their feelings into one lunchbox; appreciation, criticism, guilt, and respect. They go through a series of contemplations before holding that annual appraisal meet-up.
As soon as the year ends, employers take to their performance management system to put the year in a retrograde, evaluate employee performance with respect to HR goals and chart a future development or training plan.
Clear the air between expectations and outcomes in a subtle way. Evaluation of performance is important, but the way you do it marks all the difference.
In keeping with the theme, we’ll try to get right to the point.
Employee performance reviews are feedback or roundups given to employees after a specific time frame of service. Their immediate manager reviews an employee's progress, and the manager receives return feedback to complete the cycle. An increment or a promotion usually follows it.
To ace your performance evaluation interview, exude the willingness to perform and improve. Performance speaks volumes, but the will to build on weaknesses is greater. No amount of written feedback can supersede that. However, as an employee, self-reviewing and critiquing yourself is the first step.
It sounds bullish to rate or elucidate your work performance over a specific timeframe. But hey, that's how the clock ticker moves around. With the passage of time, all eyes go upon you, your work, and your progress. To prove your worth as a skilled professional, you would have to take the plunge.
Performance reviews can be shortened or lengthened based on the employee's preferences. It also depends on what period of the year you are writing a review in. If you're writing an annual review and feel like you have outshone your responsibilities, a well-suited dissertation works. If it is a weekly or a monthly check-in, oral verbiage sounds better than written feedback.
Following these practices will help you calm your inner trepidations and write stronger reviews:
For a manager, employee reviews translate into a more complex amalgam of implicit and explicit organizational expenses. They chart a birds-eye view of an employee's performance and what the employee garnered in terms of the organization's ROI, job requirements, team success, and senior leadership team's (SLT's) expectations.
If this is your first time providing feedback to employees as a manager, then embrace a few common tips to provide a holistic performance overview and avoid any micro-supervision.
There is always a scope for improvement, whether you are a manager or an employee. Being firm and clear in the very first leg of the performance review cycle is not possible. Grave errors are imminent but can be debugged as you learn and persevere.
Being on the same page and conquering the concerns of another peer are ideal ways to deal with mistakes. Your employees might be very sensitive to what the management thinks of them, and vice versa. One wrong move can destroy the rapport, so peddle on carefully. Implementing effective employee performance tracking systems can provide valuable insights for constructive feedback and growth opportunities.
1. Ask fewer questions
We’ve seen employee review templates that go on for pages. It can take an hour or more to fill one out, so it’s easy to see why doing so for a dozen or more employees would fill managers with dread, not to mention decision fatigue.
Instead of asking more questions, consider what you really want to know and cut the number of questions down to half a dozen or fewer.
Asking fewer questions doesn’t solve anything if you get essays in return. Try asking for a single, specific thing: the employee’s most recent "win" or a short list of bullet points. You can limit word counts and use multiple-choice questions in which the reviewer picks the closest matching response.
Recency bias, the tendency for people to focus on recent issues, is a big issue in employee performance reviews. Why not work with it instead of against it? When reviews are done quarterly instead of annually or semiannually, managers can feel free to focus on what they really remember (the last three months) instead of trying to encapsulate an entire year of ups and downs.
People aren’t easy to quantify, and by asking for numerical scores, you’re asking reviewers to form and retain their own internal translation of what your rating system means. For example, on a five-point scale, a three could mean “barely adequate,” “about average,” or “I have no opinion one way or another.” But if you replace or pair numbers with actions, like, “(5) I’d do everything in my power to keep Gary on the team," you’ll know that the scale is consistent for every employee.
Nobody knows employees better than their coworkers. Adding peer feedback to reviews is a great way for managers to see more clearly at the ground level, and it makes for a much less stressful load on managers of large departments. One or two questions applied with the same attention to brevity and specificity as your reviews are all it takes to grant insights that a supervisor might never see otherwise.
Resource: Check out these five performance review templates to get started with the employee evaluation process.
More isn’t always better, and that’s especially true for the questions you include in employee performance reviews. The trick to getting the most out of your employee reviews is to simplify the format and increase the frequency.
1. They're easier: Short reviews take less time to perform and less time to read. That makes them easier on managers and employees alike, allowing you to do them more often.
2. More frequent reviews are more topical: Fresh and important is better than stale and trivial. The more frequently you perform employee performance reviews, the more likely you are to cover issues that are fresh in the employee’s mind. With less space for tangents, you’ll discuss what really matters.
3. Subjectivity is a review’s worst enemy: You don’t want opinions; you want facts. When questions are vague, and answers are open-ended, they leave more room for personal relationships and value judgments to enter the fray. On the other hand, direct, specific questions about accomplishments and shortcomings make it easier to spot subjectivity and eliminate it from your assessments.
4. They aid engagement: Millennials are rapidly taking over the bulk of the workforce, and surveys show they love not only avocado toast but also constant feedback. Short, quarterly reviews, especially combined with monthly 1:1 check-ins, deliver that always-on channel of critique and validation. That leads to higher engagement and an even better employer brand for your organization.
It is time to look at your performance review from a different angle and spread the sparkles of love and care among your longing employees.
Addressing the issues calmly does more than save time and money; it makes the entire process more effective while simultaneously changing the negative perception of reviews for employees, managers, and entire organizations.
Set a strong foundation in the recruitment industry by establishing a strong company culture and beating up against the odds.
This article was originally published in 2019. It has been updated with new information
Rob de Luca is the senior copywriter for BambooHR. He believes HR professionals and others deserve information-rich content that enables them to do great work, and he has written extensively on the topics of HR leadership and best practices.
Effective employee-manager communication greatly benefits organizations.
Employees and HR leaders worldwide now recognize the role of professional development in...
Whether you’re a manager or an employee, partaking in performance reviews can be a stressful...
Effective employee-manager communication greatly benefits organizations.
Employees and HR leaders worldwide now recognize the role of professional development in...