Nice to meet you.

Enter your email to receive our weekly G2 Tea newsletter with the hottest marketing news, trends, and expert opinions.

I Found the 7 Best Data Visualization Software for 2025

February 3, 2025

I’ve always been fascinated by how the right visuals can turn complex information into something easy to understand. Whether in presentations, reports, or dashboards, a well-designed chart can make data more engaging and impactful. But I never actively explored data analytics—until I joined a mentorship program at G2.

As part of the program, my mentor assigned me to create a compelling data story using visualization tools. I started with the ones we already used in the company, but they fell short—some lacked customization, and others didn’t effectively highlight key insights. So, my mentor encouraged me to explore alternatives to find a better fit.

That’s when I started researching the best data visualization software, looking for tools that could not only build charts but also enhance storytelling and engagement. As I tested different tools, I quickly saw how much of a difference the right platform makes. Some were feature-rich but overly complex, while others were easy to use but lacked depth. The best ones struck a balance between usability, customization, and storytelling.

Eventually, I found the right tools to help me complete my assignment, turning raw data into a clear, engaging, and meaningful narrative. That experience reshaped how I think about data—choosing the right visualization tool isn’t just about features; it’s about making information truly accessible and impactful.

In this article, I’ll share my experience working with different data visualization tools—what stood out, what fell short, and which ones I found best for different use cases. Whether you need a tool for in-depth analysis, interactive dashboards, or simple charts for presentations, these recommendations will help you find the right fit.

7 best data visualization software that helped me tell better stories in 2025

If there’s one thing I’ve learned about data visualization in 2025, it’s that having the right tool makes all the difference. For me, it was like unlocking a new way to communicate—something more powerful than just words or spreadsheets. When you can visually express data in a way that people immediately understand, it changes how they react. It turns dry facts into insights that spark real conversations.

At first, I was focused on functionality. Could the tool handle complex datasets? Did it offer enough chart types? But as I got deeper into using them, I realized it wasn’t just about features—it was about how intuitive and engaging the experience felt, both for me as the creator and those viewing the result. If I could build something quickly and still make it look polished and insightful, that would be a win in my book.

What surprised me was how much a good visualization tool could influence decision-making. There were moments when a single well-designed chart helped steer discussions in the right direction simply because it clarified the data. It felt empowering to turn messy numbers into visuals that told a compelling story.

How did I find and evaluate these best data visualization tools?

I took a hands-on approach to finding the best data visualization tools, testing each by creating real visualizations—from quick charts to complex dashboards. I wanted tools that made the process intuitive without sacrificing flexibility or design quality. Whether I was importing small spreadsheets or large datasets, I focused on how well each tool handled different scenarios.

 

For tools I had used before, I gave them another go, this time paying close attention to what had improved. Were they faster? More intuitive? Did they offer new features that actually mattered? Some tools pleasantly surprised me with fresh innovations, while others didn’t bring much new to the table.

 

I used AI to analyze user feedback to complement my testing from platforms like G2, where real users highlight what works and what doesn’t. This helped me quickly extract key takeaways and compare tools based on real-world performance and value. By combining hands-on experience with AI-driven insights and community input, I was able to assess which tools best align with different needs and use cases.

My formula for picking the best data visualization software

Finding the right data visualization software isn’t just about generating charts—it’s about unlocking the stories hidden within the numbers. For me, it was about discovering tools that didn’t just simplify the process but empowered me to see data in new ways. I wanted platforms that could bridge the gap between raw information and real understanding, all while being intuitive, adaptable, and practical. Here’s how I approached evaluating these tools:

  • Data Integration: A visualization tool’s value lies in its connection with various data sources, so I made this a key part of my evaluation. I looked for platforms that easily integrate with spreadsheets, databases, cloud storage, and APIs. The tools I preferred supported real-time syncing, which meant my visualizations automatically updated whenever the underlying data changed. This saved me from having to manually refresh everything and let me build dashboards that stayed accurate and up to date as new data came in.
  • Customization: Every dataset tells a unique story and rigid tools can limit creativity. I focused on platforms that allowed deep customization of charts, dashboards, and reports. Whether it was changing colours, labels, or layouts, I needed tools that could adapt to different audiences and use cases. The most flexible tools let me tailor visualizations to fit specific needs, making them more impactful and engaging.
  • Templates and Design Assistance: As someone without a background in design, I found templates incredibly helpful. I preferred tools that offered an extensive library of thoughtfully designed templates, especially when they catered to various use cases, from clean business presentations to vibrant infographics. The platforms that stood out made it easy for me to adapt these templates to different datasets or purposes, allowing me to create polished visuals without starting from scratch.
  • Interactive Presentations: Data isn’t static, and I believe the way it’s presented shouldn’t be either. I looked for tools that let me seamlessly integrate charts and graphs into presentations so I could create engaging, data-driven stories. The platforms I found most useful allowed me to embed visuals into slides while keeping them interactive.
  • Visual Representation of Key Metrics: I needed tools to effectively display key performance indicators (KPIs) clearly and meaningfully. I focused on how well each tool transformed raw data into visuals, highlighting the most important metrics. The tools that allowed me to customize and showcase KPIs made tracking performance and sharing insights much easier.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Budget constraints are always a factor for me, so I weighed the value each tool offered against its cost. I looked at whether free or trial versions provided enough functionality and if premium plans were worth the price for their added features. I especially appreciated tools with flexible pricing models, as they made scaling easier without committing to high costs immediately.

After months of analyzing over 15 data visualization software, I discovered that not all tools live up to their promises. Some dazzled with flashy features but lacked practicality, while others offered solid functionality without the flexibility I needed. It was a process of trial and error and plenty of learning, but seven tools stood out in the end. These weren’t just the most functional—they were the ones that transformed how data could be understood, shared, and acted upon. 

To qualify for inclusion in the data visualization software category, a product must:

  • Consume data from a variety of sources through file uploads, database querying, and application connectors
  • Provide a visual representation of key performance indicators
*This data has been pulled from G2 in 2025. Some reviews have been edited for clarity.

1. Canva

Canva, the tool I thought was just for creating sleek infographics and eye-catching social media posts, turned out to be much more than a basic design app. Initially, I saw it as a quick-fix solution when I needed something visually appealing without diving into complex design software. But as I spent more time with it, I realized Canva goes beyond aesthetics—it’s also a solid data visualisation platform. Whether building simple charts or comprehensive data-driven presentations, Canva offers an impressive range of features that make the process easy and enjoyable.

One of my favourite features is Canva’s chart customization. The drag-and-drop interface means I don’t need advanced design skills to create something that looks clean and well-crafted. Whether it’s a bar chart, line graph, or pie chart, I can effortlessly customize layouts, fonts, and colours to suit my style or branding. The collaboration feature is another highlight. My team can jump in, leave feedback, and refine visuals in real time, saving us from endless email threads and back-and-forth edits.

Canva’s chart editor with customizable bar, line, and pie charts

I also love how Canva handles interactive presentations. Embedding charts and graphs into slides is seamless, and it helps me tell a clear, data-driven story during meetings or presentations. It’s super convenient when I want to showcase data in an informative and visually appealing way.

Another thing that stands out is the variety of templates available. Whether I need a clean bar chart or a more elaborate infographic, there’s always something that fits my needs. And for someone like me, who doesn’t have a background in design, it’s incredibly intuitive—no steep learning curve, just straightforward, user-friendly tools.

Even with all its strengths, Canva isn’t without its drawbacks. One limitation I’ve noticed is that while it offers a decent range of chart types, it falls short when it comes to advanced customization for complex datasets. If I’m working with large amounts of data or need something like a multi-axis chart, I find myself wishing for more robust options. 

Another little issue is the limited export formats for data visuals. Sure, I can download images and PDFs, but it would be great to have more flexibility, like exporting interactive charts or embedding live data.

While Canva has a generous library of stock elements, I’ve hit a few paywalls when using premium icons or graphics for infographics. While it’s manageable, it can still be frustrating when you need something specific, and it’s locked behind a subscription, especially if you’re on a budget.

What I like about Canva

  • I like how Canva makes the whole design process so smooth and accessible. Whether I need to whip up a quick chart or design a detailed presentation, everything feels easy to use. I love that I don’t need any prior design expertise—just drag, drop, and tweak, and I’m good to go. Plus, being able to customize every element, from colours to fonts, helps me create something that feels truly personal.
  • Canva’s template library is another favourite of mine. It’s not just about the variety; it’s how thoughtfully the templates are designed. Whether I need a minimalist style or something more vibrant, I can always find something that fits the tone of my project.

What G2 users like about Canva:

“The Magic continues with Canva. Truly, over the past year, it has kept upgrading and evolving, bringing ease of use to the next level all the time! It has become an 'enterprise' where any material or need you can think of that will need creativity and a professional look in the fastest time is made available, and you're good to go!

I can edit on my computer and my phone amazingly! So Canva is not just for every need but anytime, anywhere!

 

- Canva Review, Patricia C.

What I dislike about Canva:
  • I often wish for more advanced charting options. When I’m dealing with complex data, the current chart types sometimes fall short. I’d love to see options for dual-axis graphs or other advanced visuals that could handle larger datasets more effectively.
  • I do not like the limited export formats for dynamic content. While downloading images and PDFs works for static designs, it would be fantastic if I could export interactive charts or embed live data directly. This would make sharing and updating my work much easier.
What G2 users dislike about Canva:

“While working on a certain project, the search menu could not allow the user to search for a certain tool/feature until navigating to its parent section, where we can search subcategories and certain features to use.
In certain cases, while using Canvas's free features to complete a project, there are areas where most of Canvas's features are strictly premium, which dishonours its users. It's a user experience that allows certain features to be used free of charge.

- Canva Review, Safi K.

2. Looker

Using Looker feels less like working with a tool and more like stepping into a well-organized control room for your data. From the moment I started using it, I felt I had a direct line to uncover the stories hidden in our numbers. It’s not just about answering “what happened” but digging deeper into the “why” and “how.” I’ve found myself asking better questions and enjoying the process of finding answers.

The standout for me has been Looker’s dynamic dashboards. I found them incredibly interactive and versatile. For instance, I set up a project progress dashboard to drill down from overall metrics to specific task-level details. This ability to filter by categories like project stages or resource allocation gave me an immediate grasp of the data. Even as someone exploring the tool, I could see how such features would benefit teams needing clarity and detail.

Looker dashboard displaying data visualizations and analytics

Another feature that stood out during my testing was Looker’s integration capabilities. Pulling data from platforms like BigQuery and Snowflake into Looker was seamless. I experimented with combining multiple datasets to create unified views of team productivity and resource allocation. It felt efficient and eliminated the need to manually sync data between tools—a feature that could save significant time for teams working with diverse data sources.

LookML, Looker’s data modelling layer, was both a challenge and a revelation. At first, learning LookML was daunting, and I had to rely heavily on tutorials and trial and error. But as I started to understand it, I realized how valuable it was for creating consistent metrics across reports and dashboards. This consistency is particularly important for teams where standardisation is key.

Of note, Looker brings some challenges worth addressing. One downside is that I found the limited selection of ready-made templates challenging. I think having more starter templates would have made it easier for me to get started and feel confident during the onboarding process.

I also felt that the range of visualization options was somewhat narrow. I couldn’t find as many advanced chart types or design flexibility as I’ve seen in other tools, which made it harder for me to create highly polished presentations.

During my testing, I encountered a few technical issues. I noticed that filters didn’t always work the way I expected, and dashboards sometimes failed to refresh properly. While these issues didn’t happen often, they were frustrating when I was working on something important.

What I like about Looker

  • I loved how easy it was to create interactive dashboards beyond static visuals. The ability to drill down into details, apply filters, and customize views made analyzing data much more insightful and practical. The flexibility allowed me to adapt dashboards for different scenarios, whether it was tracking project timelines or analyzing resource allocation.
  • The seamless integration with platforms like BigQuery and Snowflake stood out for me. I combined datasets from different sources to create cohesive views, which I could see as invaluable for teams working with scattered data. The simplicity of connecting these platforms significantly cut down on the time and effort I’d usually spend preparing data.

What G2 users like about Looker:

“Looker has been transformative for how we manage and interpret data. It has become a tool we use weekly, if not daily. It has been central to our data consolidation and centralization process. We've combined sources, including Google Analytics, Search Console, social, and custom spreadsheets, that have completely changed how we approach reporting. It has helped us reduce time to generate reports, draw insights, and reduce errors. It was also easy to implement and scale. Looker has helped us build a culture of data-driven decision-making year-round, giving every team the tools and insights they need to operate effectively and efficiently. I have never had to reach out to customer support, which tells me the tool is doing what it is supposed to do.

 

- Looker Review, Andrea G.

What I dislike about Looker:
  • I find that building dashboards from scratch takes longer than it should. When I needed to analyze project timelines and team workload, I had to manually set up data sources, configure charts, and adjust layouts before I could even start drawing insights. Without ready-to-use templates, getting started quickly is a challenge, and I end up spending too much time on setup instead of focusing on the data.
  • I also find the visualization options limiting. I want more control over my charts to create polished, professional-looking visuals, but the lack of flexibility makes it difficult to fine-tune the details. At times, I feel like I have to compromise on design because the tool doesn’t offer enough customization.
What G2 users dislike about Looker:

“Looker can have a steep learning curve, especially with its LookML modelling language, which may be challenging for non-technical users. Its data visualization options are less customizable than tools like Tableau or Power BI. The reliance on LookML can create bottlenecks for self-service reporting. Looker's pricing can also be expensive, especially for smaller teams. Performance may slow with large datasets, and it lacks some out-of-the-box integrations and collaborative features in other BI tools.

- Looker Review, Shubham S.

Want to make complex data easier to understand? Learn how to simplify data visualization with these 3 expert tips for data scientists.

3. Looker Studio

I find it exciting to try tools that promise to simplify data chaos, so I decided to give Looker Studio a shot. At first, I wasn’t expecting much beyond the basics, but it surprised me. It wasn’t just about plugging in numbers and generating charts—it was about uncovering the stories within the data in a seamless way. For someone like me, exploring tools to find the best fit, Looker Studio felt like a step in the right direction.

One feature that stood out during my testing was data transformation. It’s not just about visualizing data; it’s about shaping it to tell a clearer story. I used some simple calculations to create new metrics directly in Looker Studio. For example, I combined revenue data with customer counts to generate a revenue-per-customer metric. Seeing these calculated fields blend seamlessly into the dashboard was satisfying, offering insights I hadn’t initially considered.

And then there’s conditional formatting. It might seem like a small feature, but for me, it made a big difference when working with large datasets. I set up a dashboard where low-performing metrics are highlighted in red and top performers stand out in green. It’s intuitive and streamlines decision-making, instantly drawing attention to what matters most.

Looker Studio dashboard showcasing conditional formatting options

Looker Studio impressed me in many areas, but I ran into a few challenges. The scheduled reporting feature was a mixed bag. While it’s convenient to automate report deliveries, I found the formatting of the emailed reports a bit inconsistent. Charts didn’t always display as expected, which meant extra work to get them presentation-ready.

Another limitation I noticed was with the native connectors. While Looker Studio integrates beautifully with Google’s ecosystem, connecting external platforms like my CRM required extra effort. I tested a third-party connector to bring in my CRM data, and while I eventually got it to work, the process felt more complicated than I expected.

While the dashboards looked great on larger screens, I found the mobile editing experience lacking. Viewing reports on a phone was fine, but making edits on the go felt clunky and limited. This gap seemed surprising for a tool that excels in so many areas.

What I like about Looker Studio

  • I loved how Looker Studio transformed raw data into a clear and engaging story. The dashboards made complex insights easy to understand at a glance. When I was exploring project timelines, the interactive charts helped me spot patterns I might have missed in a spreadsheet.
  • I loved how conditional formatting made my data visually engaging and easily interpretable. Assigning colors to specific metrics helped me to focus on what mattered most. I felt like this feature turned rows of numbers into a story I could quickly understand and share with others.

What G2 users like about Looker Studio:

“It is a tool with direct connections to various common database systems like Excel, BigQuery, etc., so the ETL process is completely automated, which is very helpful. Once in the software, it is simple and offers a wide range of data transformations and calculated fields. My favourite aspect is that it is so fast, and even if you're querying dashboards at scale, you can use BI Engine with BigQuery to maintain high performance.

 

- Looker Studio Review, Everhard O.

What I dislike about Looker Studio:
  • Although I liked the idea of automating report deliveries, the execution left me underwhelmed. The emailed reports often had formatting quirks, and some visuals didn’t render properly. It added unnecessary steps to get the reports presentation-ready.
  • I felt restricted when trying to connect Looker Studio to external platforms. While it worked smoothly with Google tools, I found it difficult to integrate data from my CRM. I had to rely on a third-party connector, and the process felt more complicated than needed.
What G2 users dislike about Looker Studio:

“What I like least is that for platforms external to Google, independent payment connectors are often necessary. Customer support for Looker Studio from Google is minimal.

- Looker Studio Review, Raúl S.

4. MongoDB Atlas

When I started exploring MongoDB Atlas, it wasn’t an obvious choice for data visualization tools. I initially thought of it as a database platform rather than a tool for visual storytelling. As I dug into its features, I discovered capabilities that made me rethink its potential for data visualization.

MongoDB Atlas dashboard displaying database metrics

One of the highlights for me was its geospatial capabilities. I worked with some location-based data, and Atlas handled it exceptionally well. I analyzed customer distribution and visualized regional performance, and the geospatial queries made the process surprisingly intuitive. What I expected to be tedious ended up being streamlined, and I found creative ways to represent geographic data visually.

Another feature I found particularly useful was the data federation. I liked being able to query data from multiple clusters, cloud storage, and external sources as if they were part of a single database. This saved me the time and effort of manual data consolidation or setting up complex pipelines.

I also explored the real-time performance monitoring tools, which are incredibly insightful.  I could see how my queries performed, pinpoint slowdowns, and make quick adjustments. This level of visibility gave me confidence that dashboards depending on live data would run smoothly and responsively, even in high-demand scenarios.

While Atlas excels at storing and scaling data, cleaning up old datasets is a different story. When I deleted data to free up storage, the compaction process didn’t reclaim as much space as I expected. This inefficiency was a missed opportunity to optimize storage costs, especially for projects dealing with rapidly growing datasets.

Budgeting with Atlas also felt tricky. Since costs are tied to CPU, memory, and storage usage, I found it hard to predict long-term expenses. Even small changes in resource usage led to unexpected costs, which made it harder for me to plan budgets effectively. This unpredictability was a significant drawback when I evaluated the tool’s cost-efficiency.

What I like about MongoDB Atlas

  • I liked how Atlas made working with location-based data intuitive and efficient. When I needed to map regional trends or evaluate geographic performance across different markets, the geospatial queries handled it seamlessly. 
  • I loved how Atlas unified data from multiple sources without any manual consolidation. Whether I was working with clusters, cloud storage, or external systems, I could query everything as though it were part of a single database. This made it easier to create comprehensive dashboards and reports.

What G2 users like about MongoDB Atlas:

“Highly efficient and scalable database service. MongoDB Atlas is a highly effective database web service in terms of features and integrations. With just a few clicks, you can browse through your data collections. It provides us with a very smooth interface and a lot of integration tools. also, Atlas offers us a wide range of monitoring and deployment tools. You can connect your codebase to mongodb and can easily fetch, upload and perform other CRUD operations within seconds.

 

- MongoDB Atlas Review, Aryan K.

What I dislike about MongoDB Atlas:
  • I found the storage cleanup process inefficient. After deleting large amounts of data, the compaction tools didn’t reclaim as much space as I expected, leading to wasted storage and potentially unnecessary costs over time.
  • I had trouble with the unpredictable pricing model. Since costs fluctuate based on CPU, memory, and storage usage, it was difficult to estimate expenses and plan budgets effectively.
What G2 users dislike about MongoDB Atlas:

“Clusters shared with other users do not seem to work as efficiently as single-user clusters. There is a time lag, and collaboration features are not that effective. I cannot use it if I have too much querying.

- MongoDB Atlas Review, Rohit T.

 Looking for the best free tools to visualize your data? Check out the 11 top free data visualization tools to simplify your work.

5. SAP Crystal Reports

If you've been searching for a tool that handles data visualization and reporting like a pro, let me tell you about my experience with SAP Crystal Reports. It has some fantastic strengths that stood out to me, but it also came with a few quirks that I had to navigate and a few quirks you’ll want to keep in mind.

The dynamic report customization immediately caught my attention. When I added filtering parameters, the reports transformed from static documents into interactive experiences.  I could filter by region, product category, or time period, which showcased how adaptable the tool can be for different needs. It felt satisfying to create something that could adapt to different audiences without duplicating effort.

Another standout feature was the control over layout design. I enjoyed tweaking every detail, from fonts to spacing, which made the reports look polished and professional. Even though I wasn’t creating reports for an audience, I could tell this level of precision would be invaluable in delivering high-quality presentations.

SAP Crystal Reports layout designer with formatting and customization options

The integration capabilities were another highlight for me. Pulling data from SQL databases, Excel sheets, and cloud-based tools was seamless. When I combined data from multiple sources, everything came together smoothly, eliminating the need for manual consolidation. This made the process faster and gave me a clear picture of how SAP Crystal Reports could handle complex datasets.

Despite these strengths, there were areas where the tool didn’t quite meet my expectations. The outdated scripting options often left me frustrated. The process felt clunky and unintuitive when I tried to customize reports using scripts. Even small changes took longer than I expected, and I found myself wishing for a more modern and user-friendly scripting environment.

The limited automation capabilities also stood out as a challenge. I tried setting up scheduled report distributions, but the process felt unnecessarily complicated. Instead of automating repetitive tasks, I spent more time managing them manually, making the process inefficient.

Another limitation I faced was the lack of real-time collaboration. When I needed team members to review or contribute to a report, the inability to work on it simultaneously caused delays. This made the process less efficient, and sometimes, it led to duplicated efforts, which could have been avoided with better collaboration features.

What I like about SAP Crystal Reports

  • I enjoyed the precision in layout control. It gave me confidence that every report I created would look well-structured and visually clear, whether for internal use or presentations. When I was trying to design a quarterly performance report, I was able to fine-tune every visual detail, making it feel ready to share straight from the tool.
  • I liked how well it integrated with diverse data sources. Consolidating information from multiple platforms felt effortless and made even complex projects manageable. When I worked on a cross-departmental analysis, the seamless data integration allowed me to effortlessly combine data from SQL, Excel, and a CRM system.

What G2 users like about SAP Crystal Reports:

“It's a powerful report tool with a sometimes counterintuitive design process, follows a ribbon region approach
It can report across a multitude of databases like MS SQL, MySQL, SQLite, and Oracle via JDBC, ODBC, ADO, etc.
basic reporting is easy, but it quickly gets hard once you try more complex reports
was once widely used as an embedded reporting tool with canned reports.

 

- SAP Crystal Reports Review, Yassiem D.

What I dislike about SAP Crystal Reports:
  • I struggled with the outdated scripting options. When I was trying to add a custom calculation for a data summary, the scripting process felt clunky, and I spent far too much time troubleshooting.
  • I found the lack of automation capabilities to be a drawback. While exploring the tool, I tested how weekly team reports could be scheduled and shared, but the process required too much manual effort. I had to set up the same steps repeatedly instead of having an option to automate them. It made me realize how much time could be saved if there were better scheduling and distribution features.
What G2 users dislike about SAP Crystal Reports:

“There is a learning curve to using this tool to its fullest capabilities, but I could say that about many common tools, such as SQL queries and Excel. Fortunately, there are many resources to learn this, including Linked In Learning or in-person courses.
Some of the most useful tools, such as creating groups and moving them into the group's footers, work well, but it is not very transparent to go back and know that is what was done later.
The tool can get behind on some formats it supports—for example, once the XLSX format was the preferred format, Crystal took some time before it was available as an export, but that was also years ago, and they may be better at it currently.

- SAP Crystal Reports Review, Melissa O.

6. AgencyAnalytics

AgencyAnalytics is another data visualization tool I explored, and it stood out to me as a great choice for agencies and marketers. While it’s designed with professionals in mind, it also felt accessible for someone like me who’s less experienced with such platforms.

One feature that worked well for me was the visual dashboard builder. It allowed me to create clear and customized snapshots of performance metrics with minimal effort. Using the drag-and-drop widgets felt intuitive, and I was able to organize data efficiently without any unnecessary complexity.

I also found the interactive charting tools incredibly helpful. When I worked with these charts, I could explore data dynamically. I loved how hovering over data points revealed additional insights, and drilling down into specific segments gave me clarity. This feature made it easier for me to identify trends and anomalies without feeling overwhelmed by the details.

Another feature that impressed me was the multi-source data visualization. I used it to pull data from platforms like Google Analytics and social media dashboards. Seeing everything in one cohesive view made a big difference for me. I found it particularly useful when I compared metrics across platforms and got a fuller picture of campaign results.

AgencyAnalytics dashboard displaying multi-source data visualizations

However, some limitations stood out during my exploration. The preset visualization templates were useful for quick setups, but I found them restrictive when I wanted more creative control over the layout. I often wished for more flexibility to design visuals aligned better with my vision.

Another area I found lacking was the absence of predictive analytics. While the tool handled current and historical data well, it didn’t offer features for forecasting future trends or identifying emerging patterns. Having access to predictive insights would have added significant value, especially for long-term planning scenarios.

Lastly, the export options felt a bit basic. While PDFs and shareable links were functional, I felt that having more versatile options, like interactive dashboards or embeddable visuals, would have made sharing data more engaging and impactful.

What I like about AgencyAnalytics

  • I found the interactive charts particularly engaging. Hovering over data points to reveal additional insights and drilling down into specific details allowed me to explore information dynamically. It felt more engaging than static visuals and provided a deeper understanding of the data being presented.
  • I enjoyed how easily I could pull in data from tools like Google Analytics and CRM systems. Consolidating metrics from various sources gave me a clearer view of how different campaigns performed. It eliminated the hassle of switching between tools and let me focus on analyzing the full context in one place.

What G2 users like about AgencyAnalytics:

“What I love most about AgencyAnalytics is how incredibly easy it is to use! The platform is not only intuitive but also packed with valuable insights that make my job so much simpler. One of the standout features is how frequently they update the platform. This ensures that users like me are always informed and ahead of the competition. It's like having a secret weapon that keeps evolving to meet my needs. AgencyAnalytics truly sets the bar high for analytics tools!

 

- AgencyAnalytics Review, Bhavya J.

What I dislike about AgencyAnalytics:
  • While the preset templates were helpful for quick setups, I found them limiting in terms of customization. There were moments when I wanted more creative control over the layouts, but the options felt restrictive. I feel adding more flexibility in design would make it easier to create visuals that align with specific goals or preferences.
  • As I worked through the platform, I found myself wanting forecasting tools. I liked how well it handled current and historical data, but I couldn’t help feeling that something was missing when planning for the future. I wanted to see projections for trends like seasonal traffic or campaign growth, and without this feature, I had to turn to other tools to fill the gap.
What G2 users dislike about AgencyAnalytics:

“Not having all the features we would like to see is quite frustrating at points, but the change request system seems effective, and we have seen updates appear quite swiftly, which addresses our issues. I'd still like to be able to offer more than two places after the decimal on more metrics (especially currency, where only having two places for something like CPV can frequently be completely irrelevant)

- AgencyAnalytics Review, Pete G.

7. SAP Crystal Server

Getting started with SAP Crystal Server was like opening a toolbox with possibilities. I immediately noticed how seamlessly it tackled complex datasets, turning overwhelming information into clear, actionable insights.

What really caught my attention was its ability to handle hierarchical data structures. This means I can easily drill down into different levels of data—like starting with a comprehensive performance overview and then zooming into specific categories or variables. It’s a fantastic way to explore trends without overwhelming myself with information upfront.

SAP Crystal Server displaying group hierarchy structure

Another feature that impressed me was the custom formulas and logic I could apply directly within reports. Whether it’s calculating trends across timeframes or creating conditional formatting rules, the system gives me the tools to add tailored analytics without needing external tools or coding expertise.

I also loved the advanced scheduling options for batch processing. It allows me to configure complex schedules for generating and distributing multiple reports to different teams or stakeholders. I can even set triggers based on specific data changes, which adds a whole new layer of automation and convenience.

However, certain things held it back. While it does offer robust functionality, I think the interface could use a more modern design—it feels a bit dated compared to competitors. It’s not that the interface is hard to use, but it doesn’t have the sleek, intuitive feel I’ve come to expect from newer tools.

I also found that integrating it with cloud-based systems wasn’t as seamless as I’d like. When I was setting it up with newer SaaS platforms, I noticed it required extra configuration steps, which felt unnecessarily complicated. These hurdles made the process feel less fluid than it should be for a tool with so much potential. And, as with many enterprise-level solutions, the pricing might be a challenge, especially if you’re working with a tighter budget.

What I like about SAP Crystal Server

  • I love how SAP Crystal Server gives me a sense of control over my data. I genuinely enjoy the flexibility it offers for tailoring reports to fit unique needs—whether formatting layouts to match specific themes or adding calculated fields that reflect deeper insights. 
  • I also enjoy how structured it keeps everything, with folders and categories that help me manage and find reports effortlessly. It’s small, but it saves so much time when I need to revisit something.

What G2 users like about SAP Crystal Server:

“SAP Crystal Server is the best tool for data visualization and reporting. Its best feature is its ability to handle large datasets. Even complex data can be analyzed, and reports are generated optimistically. Multi-language support is available for flexible working. It is an easy-to-use application with a friendly UI.

 

- SAP Crystal Server Review, Mugdha R.

What I dislike about SAP Crystal Reports:
  • What I find less appealing about SAP Crystal Server is how rigid some workflows feel. There were moments when I wished for drag-and-drop simplicity or shortcuts to streamline repetitive tasks, but the tool seemed to prioritize structure over fluidity.
  • One area where I think SAP Crystal Server could improve is the visual appeal of its charts and graphs. While they perform reliably and present data clearly, they lack the interactive features and polished design that would make presentations more engaging and visually impressive.
What G2 users dislike about SAP Crystal Server:

“As such, the SAP Crystal Server has no functional drawback. The only downside is that it requires an upgrade to access extra features like instant mobile access, dashboards, or scheduled notifications.

- SAP Crystal Server Review, Rishabh J.

Click to chat with G2s Monty-AI

Data visualization software: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

1. Which software is best for data visualization?

Based on my hands-on testing, the best software depends on your specific needs. Canva is fantastic for creating quick, visually appealing designs, while Looker and Looker Studio are better for in-depth analysis and interactive dashboards. MongoDB Atlas is my top pick if you're working with large, complex datasets.

2. What is the best data visualization tool for beginners?

For beginners, I’d recommend Canva. Its drag-and-drop interface and wide range of templates make it incredibly easy to use, even without a design background. It’s perfect for creating simple yet polished visuals.

3. What are the top free data visualization tools?

Based on my tests, Looker Studio and Canva are the top free tools. Looker Studio is perfect for interactive dashboards, while Canva offers easy customization and templates for basic data visualizations.

4. What is the easiest data visualization software to use?

For me, Canva takes the top spot for ease of use. Its intuitive interface, pre-designed templates, and flexibility make it a breeze to create visuals, even on a tight deadline.

5. Which data visualization tools are most popular in 2025?

Based on my research, Canva, Looker, Looker Studio, MongoDB Atlas, SAP Crystal Reports, and AgencyAnalytics are among the most popular tools in 2025.

6. What are the best tools for creating interactive dashboards?

I’ve had great success with Looker and Looker Studio for interactive dashboards. Looker Studio integrates seamlessly with Google tools, and Looker offers dynamic filtering and drill-down options that make exploring data effortless.

7. Which tool is best for visualizing large datasets?

For large datasets, MongoDB Atlas is my top choice. Its geospatial capabilities and ability to unify data from multiple sources make it incredibly powerful.

8. What is the most affordable data visualization software?

If affordability is your priority, Canva and Looker Studio are excellent options. Both offer robust free versions, and I’ve found them perfect for small projects or startups on a budget.

9. Which software is best for marketing analytics dashboards?

When it comes to marketing analytics, AgencyAnalytics has been my favorite. It pulls in data from platforms like Google Analytics and social media, giving me a clear view of campaign performance in one place.

10. What tools are best for real-time data visualization?

Looker and MongoDB Atlas excel in real-time data visualization. I’ve used both to build dashboards that update live, which is invaluable for tracking ongoing metrics.

From messy data to clear wins

Exploring data visualization tools taught me one key lesson: the right tool isn’t just about features—it’s about impact. It’s not enough to create visually appealing charts or dashboards; the magic happens when those visuals inspire action and clarity.

Each tool on my list had something unique to offer. Canva made designing simple, approachable, and collaborative. Looker Studio showed me how interactivity could completely change how data is understood. MongoDB Atlas proved how essential it is to manage complexity without losing precision. But no single tool could do it all—every choice depended on the story I wanted to tell and the audience I needed to reach.

If I’ve learned anything, it’s that simplicity is often the most powerful feature. Flashy visuals and endless options mean nothing if they don’t connect with the people who are viewing them. A good tool doesn’t just make data look good—it makes it meaningful, relatable, and impossible to ignore.

Here's my approach for anyone figuring out which tool to pick: start with the end in mind. Consider what you’re trying to communicate and who needs to hear it. Match the tool to your purpose, not just the trend. And don’t be afraid to test, tweak, and experiment—it’s the only way to figure out what works.
Data is more than numbers; it’s the language of insight. And with the right tools, you can be fluent.

Not sure if you’re using the best charts for your data? Explore 67 types of data visualizations and find the perfect match for your insights.

 


Get this exclusive AI content editing guide.

By downloading this guide, you are also subscribing to the weekly G2 Tea newsletter to receive marketing news and trends. You can learn more about G2's privacy policy here.